Skip to main content

Children eating school lunch
Fantastic news from Boston Public Schools:
The Boston Public Schools will serve free meals – both lunch and breakfast -- to all students, regardless of their income status this year. Boston becomes one of the largest cities in the nation to join a program aimed at serving healthy meals to more children and save families money.

“Every child has a right to healthy, nutritious meals in school, and when we saw a chance to offer these healthy meals at no cost to them, we jumped at the chance,” said Mayor Thomas M. Menino. “This takes the burden of proof off our low-income families and allows all children, regardless of income, to know healthy meals are waiting for them at school every day.”

Over the summer BPS and the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education joined a national program, currently available in 10 states and the District of Columbia. The program, called the “Community Eligibility Option,” waives meal fees for all children regardless of income status and is also being implemented in cities such as Atlanta, Detroit, Chicago and parts of New York City.

“Children can focus on learning when they are well-fed, and families can focus on education when they don’t have to budget for school meals every week,” said BPS Interim Superintendent John McDonough. “This program makes sense for students. We expect that every major city will join this national program in the next few years – and we are able to put Boston’s families at the forefront.”

Already, 78 percent of BPS students qualify for free- or reduced-price meals due to their income status. Many of those who do not qualify fall just beyond income limits. Previously, families had to fill out and return forms to qualify for the meals program. By entering into the Community Eligibility Option, BPS can waive all meal charges for all students. Parents do not need to take any action to participate. Students can continue to purchase extra food items, such as snacks, for a fee.

“Our mission is to educate every student, regardless of income or ability, and this helps us achieve that,” said Boston School Committee Chair Michael O’Neill. “We are proud to take part in this project because it will help ensure every child is ready to learn, regardless of income.”

“We moved quickly to advocate for the ability to participate in this initiative and are glad to be one of the first major cities to participate,” said Michael Peck, Director of BPS Food and Nutrition Services. “It is truly a win-win for our students and our city.”

“Community Eligibility is a great new option that helps low-income children have better access to healthy school meals and helps schools reduce administrative burdens,” said Jim Weill, President of the Food Research and Action Center (FRAC). “Boston Public Schools has been a leader in the effort to increase participation in school meals, and FRAC applauds the City for quickly embracing this opportunity which will benefit every BPS student.”

Last year, BPS launched a universal breakfast program that waived charges for all students for morning meals. This meant that families who did not previously qualify for free-or-reduced price meals saved approximately $230 per child.

The Community Eligibility Option means families will now save an additional $405 to $455 per child per year. The cost of lunch was previously $2.25 for elementary students and $2.50 for middle and high school students.

In total, the lunch charges alone added up to approximately $943,000 per year for families through reduced- or full-price meals last school year. However, BPS only collected about $585,000 of this total due to allowances for individual hardships or other situations.

Under the new program, federal meal reimbursements to BPS are expected to increase. This means that, even though the District would not collect money from students at cash registers, total meal revenue would increase by approximately $2.7 million per year.
 

WPA school lunch program poster.
More on the program from the Food Research and Action Center:
Community eligibility is the newest option available for allowing schools with high percentages of low-income children to provide free breakfast and lunch to all students. It increases participation by children in the school meal programs, reduces labor costs for schools, and increases federal revenues. In short, it allows for a healthier student body and a healthier school meal budget.

Included in the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010, community eligibility completely eliminates paper applications. Instead, schools are reimbursed through a formula based on the number of “identified students” – those certified without application for free school meals because they are in foster care or Head Start, are homeless, migrant or living in households that receive SNAP/Food Stamps, TANF cash assistance or the Food Distribution on Indian Reservation benefits. The option has been available in Illinois, Kentucky and Michigan since the start of the 2011-2012 school year. Washington D.C., New York (pdf), Ohio and West Virginia began offering the option to school districts in the 2012-2013 school year. Georgia, Florida, Maryland and Massachusetts have been added for the 2013-2014 school year.  Beginning in the 2014-2015 school year, all schools nationwide that meet the 40 percent identified student threshold will be eligible to participate in this option.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  But not all are participating, it seems . .. . (6+ / 0-)
    Ohio and West Virginia began offering the option to school districts in the 2012-2013 school year. Georgia, Florida, Maryland and Massachusetts have been added for the 2013-2014 school year.
    e.g., Baltimore (where one might think it is most needed) is not participating:
    The Baltimore school system is raising the price of student lunches to $3 — one of the highest among the nation's large, urban districts — under a plan that also provides free meals to every low-income student.

    "We are very disappointed that Baltimore city schools are not implementing the community eligibility option," said Michael J. Wilson, director of Maryland Hunger Solutions. "It would have meant that every family gets freed up a little bit in their budgets. And we think when you have the opportunity to leverage those dollars for every individual family in the city, it would be well worth it."

    Victor De La Paz, the school district's chief financial officer, said that if the system had decided to offer free lunch for all students, it would have lost state funding tied to the number of applications received for free and reduced-price lunches. The community eligibility option would eliminate the applications.

    link
      •  In a way (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Jen Hayden, Samer

        another way to look at this is that they tweaked the system so that the 14 to 16% of students who could afford to pay now pay more so as to make the lunch "free" for everybody else (from reading the entire article, it seems like the others paid 40 cents for the lunches previously)

        So this is an improvement.

        But it does seem awful petty to make anyone at all pay when the option was available to provide the meals free of cost to everybody.  

        •  I can understand Balt.'s choice IF the "all free" (0+ / 0-)

          option would actually have left them worse off b/c of reductions in state aid.

          We don't want our country back, we want our country FORWARD. --Eclectablog

          by Samer on Thu Sep 05, 2013 at 08:05:05 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  It seems like a badly designed state program (1+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            Samer

            insofar as it seems like

            1) it costs the state money (which is fine, I suppose, but silly if the feds would chip in instead)

            2) at the same time it reduces benefits to state residents

            Basically, if the GOP were in charge in MD, it'd be a no-brainer that they'd be doing all that - whether out of spite, stupidity, or whatever.

            However it turns out the problem here is with the administrators of the Baltimore City schools - it turns out that the data needed for the federal program is derived from participants in the state program (e.g., how many kids qualify for free or reduced price lunches based on income levels, etc).  Thus they claim if they didn't run the state program, they wouldn't have the information needed to apply for the federal program.

            A real catch-22 type situation!   But maybe they could Hire Michelle Rhee to figure out how to overcome this . .. .  she seems like a real genius type.

        •  But what if, as in Boston, (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          Roadbed Guy

          many of those paying fall JUST outside income eligibility, and the cost increase puts pain on their families? It's not like you're asking the 1% to pay a little more here – you're asking the near-poor to carry those a little poorer on their backs. And if the jump was 40 cents to $3, I suspect a TON of kids will be going hungry.

          Ed FitzGerald for governor Of Ohio. Women's lives depend on it. http://www.edfitzgeraldforohio.com/

          by anastasia p on Thu Sep 05, 2013 at 10:25:15 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  Sure, like I said elsewhere, this is on the (0+ / 0-)

            school administrators (being too lazy to compile the necessary data for the federal program . .. .).

            But no, the jump for those who could afford to pay was something like $2.50 to $3.00.  

            There were others in lower income brackets who were paying the reduced rate of $0.40 - they will now pay $0

            But it is a good point that this is Baltimore City (as compared to County, which is moderately affluent in places) so there are probably NO affluent families at all sending their kids to the public schools (and those who are paying, are like you say most likely just above the cutoff) - so this hurts everybody.

  •  Cheers to the Boston Public Schools! (4+ / 0-)

    A really fine thing they did there.
    This seems uniquely Democratic, doesn't it?

  •  I wonder (0+ / 0-)

    How much Boston will save by not doing all the paperwork associated with determining who got the reduced rate.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site