Skip to main content

I think it’s fair to say that Conservatives regard Progressives and Liberals as soft-headed fools, partly because we aren’t married to cultural traditions, but also because we don’t see the world as they do.  They see the world as a conflict between “worthies” and “unworthies,” divided by race, nationality, religion and/or economic status.  They see nothing wrong in being greedy and selfish.  In their worldview, this is reality, and we are stupid to dispute it.  But I believe their worldview is distorted.  It is as if they can see reality only in black and white, without color or even shades of grey.

It will likely have no impression upon Conservatives, but I would like to draw this community’s attention to several scientific studies which support the Progressive/Liberal worldview.

It’s possible that someone has already brought to the community’s attention the article which reported that “higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior.” Authors Paul K. Piffa, Daniel M. Stancatoa, Stéphane Côtéb, Rodolfo Mendoza-Dentona, and Dacher Keltnera, stated that “Seven studies using experimental and naturalistic methods reveal that upper-class individuals behave more unethically than lower-class individuals... upper-class individuals’ unethical tendencies are accounted for, in part, by their more favorable attitudes toward greed.”  Indeed, there is nothing in the ethics of Ayn Rand which recommends consideration of others.  Ego is absolute.

But, in the long term, that is not a successful strategy for social groups.  Authors Alexander J. Stewart and Joshua B. Plotkin note that cooperative behavior seems at odds with the Darwinian principle of survival of the fittest, but is abundant in nature.  They report that “Scientists have used the Prisoner Dilemma game, in which players must choose to cooperate or defect, to study the emergence and stability of cooperation...Extortion strategies perform very well in head-to-head competitions, but they fare poorly in large, evolving populations.”  The authors concluded from mathematical tests that there was “a closely related set of generous strategies, which cooperate with others and forgive defection, that replace extortionists and dominate in large populations.” [my italics]  They concluded that their “results help to explain the evolution of cooperation.”  It arises from the fact that we are not just competing individuals; we are members of social groups, which aim to carry on over time.

Authors Andrew W. Deltona, Max M. Krasnowa, Leda Cosmidesa and John Toobya have analyzed the results of “one-shot encounters,” i.e., tests where people don’t know each other and meet only once, and found that “...generosity evolves because, at the ultimate level, it is a high-return cooperative strategy.”  They conclude that “Human generosity, far from being a thin veneer of cultural conditioning atop a Machiavellian core, may turn out to be a bedrock feature of human nature.”

Other social researchers have found that “indirect reciprocity,” the kind mediated by “gossip,” is also effective.  Authors Erez Yoeli, Moshe Hoffman, David G. Rand, and Martin A. Nowak worked with a utility company and discovered that “reputational concerns...can be harnessed to increase cooperation in a relevant, real-world public goods game.”

Conservatives will likely dismiss “reputational concerns,” based on their worldview, but they are a minority of the population.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Agreed, but I don't think it's a world view. (0+ / 0-)

    It's a very myopic view, self-centered, but not self-perceptive.  I think these self-centered people are ego-centric, but instinct-driven to the point where they have no awareness of self and, having no basis for comparison, no awareness of others either. Their perception, or what they see, is entirely superficial and, since appearances are deceiving, often mistaken. That is, they see wrong, respond in error and end up badly. That then accounts for their mean-spiritedness and negativity. "Nabobs of negativism."
    The high social standing is entirely illusory. Having made predatory behaviors such as hunting, catching, accumulating and hoarding abstract, the majority of us don't let it affect us materially, except when we let the predators (e.g. Trump, McCain, et al) distract us.
    Read "The Lottery" by Shirley Jackson.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site