Skip to main content

There's a fabulous piece online about the Republican's relentless and dishonest assault on Obamacare, detailing and refuting all of the lies that they have been telling to counter it. The headline says it all:

"Are Republicans So Frantic to Stop Obamacare Because They Fear It Will Work?"

Read more below:

Unlike the Chuck Todds of the world, this piece is one where the reporter picks a corner, defends it and then attacks, ripping apart the GOPs deceit with skill and not a little viciousness. It was a delight to read. From the opening paragraph, the relentlessness is apparent

What is it about Obamacare that compels seemingly intelligent people to explode in bubbling spasms of stupid? Are they misinformed? Unable to see past the rage-fueled partisan sweat dripping into their eyes? Or just plain dishonest?
The piece then highlights what I have been saying for a long time about the GOP and their attacks on Obamacare: That they are going to look terrible in the future once the history is told.
At this point, it has become obvious that history will look back on the four-year war on Obamacare as one of the saddest, most bizarre, and most dishonestly embarrassing episodes of our time. I have given up trying to understand the vehement opposition of so many who cannot offer up truthful reasons for their objections, and instead fuel the hatred and fears of the uninformed with the most illogical, mendacious, and fundamentally bizarre arguments that have ever been marshaled. By comparison, Joe McCarthy’s McCarthyistic McCarthyism was an exercise in reason.
The piece then goes down the list - death panels, government takeover of health care, Washington dictating treatments and on and on and on. It goes after the lies, the conservative academics who push out purported "independent analysis" that is bogus, and on and on and on. Recently, conservative nut Betsy McGaughy argued that Obamacare would force doctors to ask patients about their sex lives and bemoaned the horrors of electronic medical records. The Vanity Fair piece responds:
The time may well have come to reconsider whether (McGaughy) should ever be taken seriously again. That is, if you have in the past. In fact, her new diatribe suggests either she has a really bad doctor or she needs to see a good one... know that there are plenty of social conservatives who consider sex to be something icky that should never be discussed or something immaculate that shouldn’t be enjoyable, but the reality is, good doctors ask about sex. That is not an Obamacare requirement—it is something that medical students learn in their first year when studying how to take a history and physical of a patient....This is part of what is called “social history,” and it is a critical part of any medical examination. That involves smoking history, use of alcohol, other drug use, and, yes, sex. The discussion of sexual matters is not so the doctor can run off into the next room and giggle about pee-pees. It is an essential part of any medical exam because it can be a key contributor to someone’s health.
Then, on medical records, the piece notes that the largest health care company in the world uses them, and boasts that they "improve 'safety, quality, effectiveness, and efficiency of health care." Then the author writes:
Safety, quality, effectiveness, and efficiency? What a nightmare! Betsy, you better call (the company) right now and let them know that their system to make medical care better does not have your stamp of approval because—hell, I don’t know. You never explain a reason other than to suggest that the next Edward Snowden will leak everyone’s health-care information before fleeing to Russia.
I can't quote anymore without violating fair use, but it is a lengthy piece worth a read. Plus, it is apparently just part one. The second part about the truth of Obamacare is going to be posted next week.
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

skybluewater, Bob Johnson, SME in Seattle, Alumbrados, Sylv, vicki, TXdem, oofer, filkertom, decisivemoment, mwm341, Gooserock, TrueBlueMajority, NYmom, peglyn, Emerson, karlpk, Sherri in TX, donna in evanston, Wintermute, Vico, eeff, dsb, Duncan Idaho, exNYinTX, lady sisyphus, JLFinch, EricS, dgb, pollbuster, retLT, itskevin, bwren, Cedwyn, artebella, aitchdee, tidalwave1, psnyder, annan, NYC Sophia, figbash, Lawrence, roseeriter, chantedor, Brian82, Diana in NoVa, JayBat, zerelda, davybaby, Curt Matlock, Kitsap River, randallt, KayCeSF, Vicky, tomjones, hayden, xyz, Black Max, Josiah Bartlett, Sybil Liberty, Armand451, J Orygun, Gowrie Gal, davidkc, Ckntfld, v2aggie2, caul, stlawrence, sc kitty, Militarytracy, Alice Venturi, JohnB47, dewtx, viral, Brooke In Seattle, Kevskos, Gary Norton, reflectionsv37, ratzo, fixxit, eru, WinSmith, scribe69, cfk, Ianb007, Pam from Calif, Sun Tzu, where4art, Fury, ladybug53, Ice Blue, peteri2, most peculiar mama, BayAreaKen, blue jersey mom, kaliope, Savvy813, Jlukes, peacestpete, SocioSam, Brubs, Alan Arizona, zozie, fhcec, xaxnar, begone, barbybuddy, tommymet, Debbie in ME, vigilant meerkat, cybersaur, BlueInARedState, Themistoclea, profundo, Gorette, koNko, deha, Naniboujou, Lefty Coaster, Rosaura, Libby Shaw, el cid, middleagedhousewife, onionjim, AmBushed, CA Nana, Clive all hat no horse Rodeo, BB10, blueoregon, FrankieB, bstotts, Nulwee, Pandoras Box, PatConnors, Aaa T Tudeattack, ladypockt, gtaylor, ammasdarling, Sapere aude, Cronesense, Habitat Vic, hawaii2, Loudoun County Dem, Debs2, devis1, Dartagnan, ColoTim, puakev, yoduuuh do or do not, Wino, Trial Lawyer Richard, Cofcos, Matt Z, terabytes, burlydee, deepeco, eOz, bnasley, mbh1023, 99 Percent Pure, HCKAD, jayden, millwood, gchaucer2, Librarianmom, yella dawg, cececville, christianlsv, skod, janatallow, BasharH, homerun, spearfish, Ralphdog, vet, on the cusp, TomP, Empower Ink, JDWolverton, mconvente, VelvetElvis, TX Freethinker, gfv6800, HappyinNM, GAS, OleHippieChick, Sixty Something, Youffraita, Involuntary Exile, Judge Moonbox, bythesea, elwior, Lujane, tofumagoo, pamelabrown, vernonbc, Jeff Y, catly, Al Fondy, dmhlt 66, 207wickedgood, maggiejean, cadfile, Bule Betawi, Rhysling, weaponsofmassdeception, Neon Vincent, juca, bobatkinson, CanyonWren, LeftOfYou, Sarge in Seattle, janmtairy, indres, earicicle, I give in to sin, DefendOurConstitution, virginwoolf, followyourbliss, TheOpinionGuy, glitterlust, Leslie in KY, COwoman, Denise Oliver Velez, Kysen, guyeda, stevenwag, ArthurPoet, Tortmaster, Dragon5616, futureliveshere, Larsstephens, Railfan, awcomeon, FogCityJohn, estreya, blueyescryinintherain, Orlaine, CS in AZ, biggiefries, Crabby Abbey, Polly Syllabic, VickiL, DrWhk, ATFILLINOIS, Arenosa, pixxer, ItsSimpleSimon, AJ in Camden, DiegoUK, Yasuragi, addisnana, nirbama, MsGrin, ericlewis0, Floande, Loose Fur, catlady, slice, theKgirls, Onomastic, kerflooey, annominous, agrenadier, I love OCD, zooecium, nervousnellie, bgblcklab1, slowbutsure, Mr MadAsHell, Seitanist, Nicci August, mrsgoo, marleycat, badscience, thomask, ShowMeMoBlue, Hoghead99, BarackStarObama, sofa turf, MRA NY, myrmecia gulosa, bluedust, VTCC73, Miggles, SoCalSal, stlsophos, joanbrooker, DRo, YaNevaNo, AnnetteK, Sister Inspired Revolver of Freedom, hulibow, chmood, anodnhajo, sow hat, cwsmoke, IndieGuy, ahumbleopinion, orpurple, barkingcat, a2nite, radical simplicity, Laiane, MartyM, doroma, wxorknot, rat racer, surreal times, TheLawnRanger, Chaddiwicker, nomandates, Dallas L, TheMeansAreTheEnd, countwebb, The grouch, newinfluence, remembrance, twocrows1023, poopdogcomedy, DustBunny, goodpractice, Alhambra, JerryNA, Jon Sitzman, Icicle68, Smoh, BadKitties, ET3117, tampaedski, Shadowmuffin, Ishmaelbychoice, duhban, OregonWetDog, WFBMM, northcountry21st, TheDuckManCometh, Chas 981, H E Pennypacker, eagleray, Zwenkau, Gurnt, slokat, boppersan

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site