Skip to main content

The increased radicalism on the blight wing has been discussed as heels digging in against a lost 2012 election combined with gerrymandering that created dead red districts in which the only threat to a red candidate comes from even deeper red upstarts.

There is another factor in this that is the mystery of the emerging radical leaders in the Rabid Frothing Clown Party.  Ayn Rand Paul, Calgary Rafael Cruz, Yacht-lift Rubio and some of the other hatchling leaders are apparently crazier than the mainline Republican, but why are these bright guys placing their bets on that side of the asylum?  

They obviously can count and know that their opportunities for acquiring the presidency are dwindling quickly and may have already passed.  Demographics grind their chances into smaller particles daily.  They appeal to an increasingly small portion of Americans and by their anarchistic actions are not going to swing independents their way.  They know they have little chance of winning the presidency in 2016.

So what are they doing?

With the inexorable force of demographic changes grinding on the blight wing chances of winning the presidency, the game has changed for those most ambitious of the Rabid Frothing Clowns.  I'm going to guess these guys looked at 2012 and drew two conclusions:

1.  Blight wing chances to win the Presidency are small unless there is some factor that causes a pretty significant wind shift.
2.  There is a nearly infinite amount of money that can be had from the big-money blight wing donors.

Conclusion 2b might be that you don't have to win to get the money. Big money on the blight wing went to people who had no chance as well as to the rich guy who did.  Ask Karl Rove how much you need to win to get rich.  Hell, you do not even need to run to get the money.  But the guy who gets the money will own the trough from which party candidates will need to feed, and that guy will collect some serious obligations.

The big lesson is that whomever emerges as the lead clown soon will be the recipient of limitless money and power for however that clown wishes to wield it, or until brought down by scandal.

That actually may be lesson 3 from recent years: the only scandal too big to handle is one that gets you indicted.  There is no accountability.

The calculation is not for becoming president, but for becoming the biggest power broker on the blight wing of this country.  Wealth and extraordinary power without having to actually be president looks like a pretty good deal.  The power to select candidates and issues allows that lead clown the ability to raise whatever mischief he or she desires, without accountability.  If the winds were to blow the blight way, favoring a clown candidate for president, the lead clown would be in position to either claim the candidacy or control whomever was to become candidate, both in choosing the candidate and controlling the candidate him- or herself.

All the noise coming from the Rabid Frothing Clown party right now is an admission of the relatively permanent minority status.  

The battle is for the right to claim the money and power.

And that, as we all know, is all the blight wing cares about.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site