Skip to main content

The unfolding Republican civil war seems to have drawn a line between teabagers and establishment Republicans. But I see a more interesting division: the Kochs versus Wall Street.

Firstly, I think its important to not lump all members of wall street or the chamber of commerce in the same boat. There are many responsible business owners who are civic minded (Warren Buffet, Bill Gates, etc.), and many other who are nothing more than well educated looters (Mitt Romney).

That being said, I'd like to propose what the current split in the Republican Party is really, is a split between big private monday, and big public money. Case in point is todays meeting between Obama and 19 top CEOs and the Chamber of Commerce on how to end this shutdown nonsense.

Remember what happened when the CEO of Whole Foods penned an op-ed bashing Obamacare? Huge backlash! Their stock took a dive, their revenues took a dive, and the board came down hard against any future shenanigans. Likewise when the head of Susan G Komen came out against Planned Perenthood, there was another huge backlash. From individual donors and volunteers, but also from many corporations that had products tainted with the now loathed pink ribbon.

These are corporations with boards, with shareholders, and with brands. Any kind of political backlash will effect their profits, so they stay out of it. Even private equity firms fall into this category... the goal is to eventually take a company public, so anything hurting the brand hurts the company.

But what about the Koch brothers? Their corporation is privately held. And they don't really sell directly to consumers... even if they did, oil is so important we can't just stop buying it. They are like cigarette companies: most consumers hate the company but keep buying the product. So any political backlash would not even register with them.

They don't know how out-of-touch they are, because there is no penalty for them being wrong. Sounds a bit like a teabagger in a safe district, yes?

The good news is that public money is more influential than private money... Mainly because private companies are either small, or have such small margins they can't have the influence of banks, hollywood, or telcoms with massive profits. If it came down to it, the Chamber of Commerce could twist enough arms if needed... The shutdown will end, and the debt ceiling will be lifted... in time.

But it is clear that the Kochs and the Tea Party can cause a significant amount of damage to innocent people, and suffer few consequences from being so completely wrong...

That, my friends, is the true underlying problem... it wont be solved any time soon, and its going to get a lot worse before it gets better.

HOW TO FIX IT: I didn't want this to be a complete bummer of a post, so I thought I'd offer what I think is the solution. We have problems with the Tea Party because the primary system is so bonkers! I'd suggest a fix: instant runoff voting (IRV).

IRV eliminates the primary entirely: both the primary and the general election occur on the same ballot. All candidates from all parties at the same time. Instead of voting for one candidate, you rank them in order of preference! That means there is no way a teabagger would ever win the seat again, since their approval rating is about 10% these days. That's enough to win a Republican primary, but not enough to win the general election.

This idea is not new: its a way to avoid spoilers ruining races, and to avoid electing somebody far outside mainstream opinion. And since currently IRV would mainly help establishment Republicans defeat Teabaggers in primaries, it might actually get bipartisan support for a change.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site