Skip to main content

Julia Olson is executive director of Our Children's Trust and works with attorneys, scientists, filmmakers, and youth to secure science-based climate recovery plans to return CO2 levels to 350 ppm, under the Public Trust Doctrine. She is a mother, a lawyer, and a professor.

Three days ago I was heading to the northernmost town in the United States in order to help a dedicated public interest attorney prepare for and argue one of the most important cases the Supreme Court of Alaska has ever heard, Nelson Kanuk v. State of Alaska. The case is about whether the Alaska Constitution requires the State to protect the atmosphere as a public trust resource for present and future generations.  It’s only the second time the Alaska Supreme Court has traveled to Barrow (originally called Ukpeagvik, meaning “place to hunt snowy owls”) for oral argument.  The last time was over 30 years ago to hear a case on offshore oil and gas development in the Beaufort Sea.  Tonight, as I sit here at the Polar Bear Apartment we rented at 4476 North Star Road (just 4476 to locals), I am in awe of the richness of this place and the overwhelming experience of being at the top of the world.  I could not have anticipated all that I would witness and learn these past two short days.

When you walk out of the Alaska Airlines hangar in Barrow in October, it’s cold, the ground is white, the sky is usually grey, and it’s flat.  Nearly all of the buildings are on pilings or stilts because of the soggy permafrost when it warms, the roads are unpaved gravel under the ice and snow, and the only other things breaking up the vast landscape are the Arctic Ocean and the occasional snow covered lagoon.  To my eyes, it was stark.  But I was looking forward to spending a few days with my cousin, who happens to be teaching English at Ilisagvik College here for the past two years.

I got the twilight tour from my cousin-in-law right when I arrived.  It didn’t take long to circumnavigate this town of fewer than 5000 people and drive a short distance north to the Inupiat hunting huts, where the bloodstains of recently harvested bowhead whales marred the white landscape.  Gulls flocked to find remnants of whale blubber, called maktak, and 50 yards away, the ocean gently rocked against the course black sandy shoreline, which is not much of a beach anymore with the rising waters from warming oceans and melting ice.  What elders say used to stretch many yards out, consistent with old photos, is now a narrow strip of black sand.

I spent the night with my cousins and their newly adopted and retired sled-dog Sisuaq (which means beluga), in the home it took them seven months to secure because of the dearth of housing in Barrow.  Sisuaq’s thick white coat smells of the whale blubber and meat she has grown up eating.  And though she has spent her life outside finding shelter only inside wooden kennels over snow like the other dogs (qimmiq), in a matter of weeks she has decided the warm indoor life of humans is perfectly acceptable.  She’ll still spend her days outdoors to grow her warm winter coat, but her story is a perfect allegory to our species as well.  We so quickly become accustomed to comforts, which we don’t necessarily need.  But I was glad that the old girl, who has a lot of life in her yet, was sleeping inside last night and not on the cold snow.  I too was projecting my views of comfort on her.  I’m anthropomorphizing, yes, but she was cozy.  As was I, in these overheated buildings.  It may be 20 degrees or 20 below outside, but it’s a toasty 75 degrees on the inside, so be sure to pack your t-shirts when traveling to Barrow.

After awaking to a dark morning and snow flurries, I picked up my dear friend, and plaintiff in the Alaska Atmospheric Trust (ATL) case, Nelson Kanuk, from the airport.  We toured the Ilisagvik College, ate burgers in the cafeteria, and presented the TRUST Campaign to a group of staff, faculty, and students of the college.  We showed the ever-inspiring Stories of TRUST:  Calling for Climate Recovery films of Colorado, Arizona, and Alaska and Nelson shared his sad news that his family home has indeed been lost due to the permafrost melt, erosion, and flooding that prevented them from staying where they lived in the village of Kipnuk.  Katherine Dolma, co-plaintiff with Nelson, joined us to share her story about the melting glaciers, pine-beetle killed trees, and erosion happening near her home in Homer.  She inspired the crowd with her story of starting the first recycling program in Homer.  She is one of a handful of youth to win a presidential award for her service work, just as Xiuhtezcatl Martinez did earlier this year.  The Barrow residents asked her to start a recycling program here, where everything now goes to the dump.  Glass, paper, cardboard, aluminum, tin, plastic, Styrofoam . . . it all goes to the dump, the new one, because the old one has been filled and closed.  Large barges come to town regularly to bring cars, building materials, equipment, goods of all kinds, and they leave empty. The recyclables do not get taken to recycling facilities because it would cost the Borough money to recycle their waste. When no one pays, the earth pays.  Wildlife pays.  Water pays.  Air pays.  The future will pay.  It’s being left for another day.

I love telling people about the Public Trust Doctrine, its ancient origins from that Roman Emperor named Justinian, and it’s very practical and logical role in our system of law.  The Public Trust Doctrine transcends legal complexities that have become the norm.  People get it.  They like it.  Of course we would protect essential natural resources that we need for our survival.  Of course the government can’t allow anyone to irreparably harm those resources, least of all itself.  Of course we would pass our natural heritage down to future generations. Of course . . . it’s not being done.  

After sharing our story of ATL, our new friends, Matt and Shannon, took us on a tour that I’ll remember for the rest of my life.  They showed us first-hand just how much our government studies the human-caused global climate crisis.  The tour crystallized for me how much we have studied this crisis over the last 30 years and how little government has done to protect us from it.  Knowledge and science are half the battle, but law and action are the other half.  

Most people don’t know that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA, a federal agency within the Department of Commerce) runs 4 greenhouse gas and ozone monitoring stations around the world.  For more than half a century they have been measuring CO2 and other gas levels in our air, and for nearly a century they have been monitoring the ozone layer. One of these very important monitoring stations is the Barrow Observatory.  The others are in Hawaii, Samoa, and Antarctica.  As fate would have it, we happened to know the right people to get a tour.  Even though the federal government is “shutdown” right now, these employees are deemed “essential.”  That should tell you something about how important their work is.  There are only two technicians at the Barrow Observatory and they make sure this crazy array of equipment, computers, compressors, blown glass sample containers, and wires are all doing what they are supposed to be doing to track the changing composition of the atmosphere every second.  For decades federal employees have been watching the numbers of CO2 go up.  The graph is frightening.  CO2 in Barrow has topped 400 ppm, which tops the current graph. While we were at the station, Nelson and Katherine got their own encapsulated sample of air with CO2 levels at that moment of 394.04 ppm.  CO2 levels fluctuate throughout the day, and the year, with highs in the summer and lows in the winter, but nonetheless they are continually on the rise.
Seeing those instruments at work and hearing from the technicians who keep the place running, hammers home just how important the science is.  If we didn’t have those measurements, we wouldn’t understand as clearly how humans are causing this problem of warming and why it’s occurring.  The monitoring station here in Barrow, and the 3 others, give us a fighting chance at addressing this problem.  I’ll keep my vile of air as a reminder of why we work so hard each day to win these cases on behalf of our nation’s children.  I hope that one day when my grandchildren see that vile, they will see CO2 levels dropping below 394 ppm and they’ll be mindful of how close we came to irreparably harming their resources, and how some brave young people and some brave judges with the incredible dedication of scientists helped turn things around for us.  Oddly, that little vile of air gives me hope.
There were polar bear paw prints outside of the station yesterday.  Perhaps they came to town to join in the whale harvest.  We never saw the bears, but we did witness the subsistence harvest of bowhead whales or agviq. Just north of the NOAA station, dozens of trucks were gathered in a circle around two boats and two mostly-butchered one-year-old agviq.  Most of the blubber was cut into 6-inch by 12-inch sections and was being divided and piled onto truck beds to take back into town.  The skulls and baleen were separated from the entrails, still perfectly intact, from the bony structure of the whale’s body, from the fins.  New circles of red marked the snow.  The smell of meat and ocean was strong and sometimes pungent, and young children and grown men worked quickly to hook chunks of maktak and whale meat into their trucks, as women watched.  I have never seen so much blood.  My own blood was pumping vigorously.  I was simultaneously invigorated to see the Inupiat of Barrow harvesting their traditional sustenance for the winter, and sorrowful for the double deaths of two whales.  Intellectually I respect the importance of this food for the Inupiat.  And I understand the heritage and cultural meaning for a people who live in a vastly different world than their ancestors.  And yet, it is not my subsistence culture or familial heritage.  And I admit that I feel compassion for these whales.  My heart and my head strive to find reason and compassion for both whale and human.  

I wish I could do justice to this 3-hour window into the dichotomy of Barrow’s experience.  One moment, I witness an ancient practice of a resilient people who have lived for generations in a harsh environment where their primary food source was from the ocean in the form of marine mammals, like whales, seals, and walruses along with occasional fish.  The descendants of the original Inupiaq can now go to the AC, the local grocery store, and buy most food you could buy in the lower 48, for three times the price, but it’s there, transported by plane and barge.  In contrast, a whale harvest does not exacerbate climate change.  The weekly delivery of groceries from around the world does.

And while the people of Barrow share communally in the bounty of a successful whale hunt, the specialized monitoring equipment at the NOAA observatory uses modern technology to track the destruction of the atmospheric resource from the modern industrialization and the consequent carbon emissions.  Hunting and butchering whales.  Only a mile from one of the most important observatories of the atmospheric resource on earth.  Barrow is a collision of incredible scientific data collection borne of the modern world and ancient human survival in harsh conditions.  It is also ground zero for climate impacts with changing sea ice conditions, melting permafrost, later winters, and early melting sea ice in summer.  In Point Lay, another village in the North Slope Borough, walruses (also a food source for many) are dangerously stranded on an island because of the absence of sea ice.  Sinkholes in the melting tundra in Point Lay are threatening infrastructure.

Here, the people worry about their ability to continue their subsistence hunting because of the unstable ice.  In fact, this spring, the Inupiat in Barrow had their latest seasonal whale harvest ever recorded.  They had tried through the spring to hunt and were unsuccessful because of the early receding ice.  Fearing they might not harvest at all, they finally took two older and larger whales in June.  Rumor has it that they killed larger whales than usual, and later discovered they were 150 and 200 years old.  I had no idea a whale could live so long.  The long-lived genes of those two whales are now gone.  And the Inupiat would have preferred to eat the less tough and fresh meat of a younger whale.  But global warming and melting ice interfered.

Even though the bowhead whale population seems stable and growing right now, which allows for the legally permitted 20 strikes on bowheads as part of the subsistence hunt, the change in the whales’ food source as ocean acidification threatens the krill they feed on could change their fate in the coming decades.  No one loves the bowhead whales more than the Inupiat.  They would do anything to protect them.  We heard from many in Barrow that they hope Nelson and Katherine and the other plaintiffs win this case.  They see what is happening to their land and ice.  And yet the North Slope Borough relies on money that comes from the oil and gas industry.  They bring money and jobs to the North Slope.  These are complicated questions implicating money, public services, standards of living, food, subsistence, ways of life, progress, and posterity.  There are no simple answers.

But there are simple answers for the Supreme Court of Alaska to address.  At the oral argument today, in a packed auditorium at Barrow High School, Justices Fabe, Winfree, Maassen, and Bolger heard Brad De Noble argue on behalf of youth that the atmosphere is a legally protected resource under the Alaska Constitution and that they must hear Nelson and Katherine’s case, while the State’s attorney argued that Nelson’s loss of his house was not an adequate harm to give him the right to go to court, and that the court cannot make any decisions implicating climate change because it is reserved for the legislature.  Since when did climate change become only a political issue?  Perhaps since big oil, big coal, and big gas decided they could buy politicians, deceive the American public for decades about climate change, all to increase the money in their pocketbooks, at the expense of the future of our kids. Ultimately the Court will decide whether the case can be heard and whether the atmosphere must be protected by the State.  Brad, concluded his compelling argument to the Court by saying:
 

The Alaska constitution guarantees these young appellants, in fact all citizens of the Alaska, a decision from this court that preserves this great land and its resources, and secures and transmits to succeeding generations equal rights, opportunities, and protection under the law.
The Justices were engaged and engaging in Barrow, and the case is now in their fateful hands to be decided in the coming months.  The young people and community members of Barrow were educated about their constitutional rights, the importance of the judiciary, and they were encouraged to pursue careers in the legal system to broaden the diversity of lawyers and judges in Alaska.  I hope more Inupiat do become judges because the perspective they would bring, given their heritage and relationship to the land and sea and ice, would serve us all well.  

Everyone sees the impacts of climate change here in Barrow.  It is accepted, common knowledge.  Ironically, as we left the high school courtroom today, the icicles hanging from the school were melting, the sun was shining through the clouds and temperatures were above freezing.  It felt warm.  I don’t know how unusual that is for early October, but it was unnerving.  And so we did what anyone might do after one of the most important oral arguments of your career and when the sun is shining in Barrow—we took the polar plunge!  Nelson, Katherine, Brenda (Katherine’s mom), Brad, and I all jumped in the Arctic Ocean.  (Brad, our fearless leader, dove in head-first! You have to be bold to do this work and that dive spoke volumes).  “Cold” does not begin to describe the water, but it felt necessary.  Sometimes you have to do something a little crazy to get perspective and remind yourself that since we live on this planet for such a short time, we might as well live it well, and leave it well for the next generation.

I flew to Barrow.  I expended carbon.  I contributed to climate change.  Was it worth the carbon footprint?  I don’t know how to begin to answer that question.  I don’t know from where the most important decision from a court will come.  I don’t know if this blog post will touch you and make a difference, but I hope it does.  I hope the Alaska Supreme Court will break through the punting that has preceded this case and make an historic decision on behalf of these young people.  I hope by Brad, Nelson, Katherine, Brenda, and I being in Barrow, seeing the NOAA observatory, the whale harvest, swimming in the Arctic, sitting in a high school before four justices of the Alaska Supreme Court, sharing our collective stories, and work on the TRUST Campaign, we helped change the course of history for the better.  I know Nelson and Katherine will make this world a healthier place to live, and they now have more tools in their belts to do so.  And I know that we came together with others in this community and lived richly for a few days, connecting with one another, talking, exploring how we can carry this work forward, and educating hundreds of youth on the North Slope of Alaska in the process.

I hope it was worth the carbon.  For the sake of my kids and yours, and especially theirs.  May it be worth it’s price.  

It’s midnight.  The northern lights are dancing above the clouds tonight.  I know they are there, though I can’t see them because it’s been lightly snowing.  Whales are swimming in the waters nearby.  Polar bears will soon travel to the smell of whale bones looking for leftovers.  Tomorrow, we’ll awake and hope that this special place will hold onto its heritage, its ice, and its wildlife for centuries to come.  I hope the Inupiat have the opportunity to continue their subsistence way of life for posterity.

And as for Brad, our fearless attorney, he’s off to search for polar bears in the dark of the morning with wildlife photographer John Tidwell.  I hope he finds a glimpse of one at dawn.  And I hope when his 14-month old twins are his age, they too will be able to go in search of polar bears in their home state of Alaska, and that they will find them healthy and abundant.

Katherine and Nelson are back to their senior year in high school and freshman year in college, respectively, and undoubtedly they will continue having an enormous impact as they share their stories and pursue their legal remedy of government action on climate change.  They are the future of our nation, and because of them and their light, I feel hopeful.

Thanks to all of the people of Barrow who made our brief stay there memorable and impactful—those we met and those who touched our lives without knowing us.  And to Brad, Nelson, and Katherine, thank you.  

Update Note:  Brad did see polar bears!  

To see some of the press coverage from the oral argument check out these links:

Salon
Climate Progress
Alaska Public Media

Check out TRUST Alaska, the short documentary featuring Nelson Kanuk and his climate change story.

And to provide your support to Nelson, Katherine and the other youth plaintiffs, please consider making a donation to Our Children’s Trust.  No amount is too small and it will help them continue their advocacy, and help us continue to support their legal effort.  We run lean and strong and your contribution will go a long way!

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  What do you want the government to do? (0+ / 0-)

    They can't move the people, and their village. I'm not sure of the footprint of the people but it's very high.

    I too have been to the North Slope Borough, spent a winter, arrived just after the solstice, stayed till mid April. Everything ran on fuel, 24/7, no engines ever shut off, only to change the oil or do repairs. The town I arrived at and left from had a permanent ground fog from diesel exhaust. Diesel powered generators powered electric heaters that raised the air temperature over a hundred degrees above outside.

    I believe the Inuit were getting royalties from the oil, they were constantly flying to Hawaii, it's not too far as Alaska juts out W into the ocean. You'd see them at the airport all the time. I can sympathize, I guess if I lived above the circle and could fly to Hawaii for vacations I would too.

    But that's the rub, we all have good reasons to fly here and there, we all live very carbon intensive lives, in order for the government to do something about it we'd need to cut back tremendously on our consumption, all of us. Barrow existed before the importation of fuel on barges, but I sure wouldn't wish anyone a return to that life.

    “Conservation… is a positive exercise of skill and insight, not merely a negative exercise of abstinence and caution…” Aldo Leopold

    by ban nock on Tue Oct 08, 2013 at 04:26:59 PM PDT

    •  Government needs a comprehensive plan (0+ / 0-)

      The case being heard in Barrow was not about North Slope emissions.  It is about government's obligation to its citizens to protect public trust resources like air and water (and ice) for present and future generations.  The atmospheric resource is already compromised and compromising all of our other resources.  

      If we want a real chance to preserve a habitable climate system for our children, we need our government to plan for climate recovery and help us transition off of fossil fuels.  Without government leadership now, we will seal the fate of generations to come.  

      We aren't asking the court to dictate how the emission reductions happen, but to order that the political branches of government figure it out, and act quickly.  

      Reducing fossil fuel consumption is critical.  Fortunately, we have abundant alternatives for energy, we can be more efficient and we can conserve without going back to the dark ages.  That doesn't mean it's going to be a cake walk.  But it won't happen in time without our government leading to protect our essential commonly-shared resources, as it was established to do in the first place.

  •  Outstanding diary and observations (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Otteray Scribe, angelajean

    Thank you so much!

    After I got laid off from the Fairbanks newspaper in the late '90s, I was offered the position of editor of the Barrow newspaper.

    I thought about it for a day or so, but then declined the opportunity.

    Sometimes I truly regret turning that down. What an experience that would have been.

    Habit of eating have been found increased in people, they just need a sitting place where they can finish their hunger. -- spammer pauldavis 8/21/13

    by Senor Unoball on Tue Oct 08, 2013 at 04:42:19 PM PDT

  •  I miss my time in Alaska and regret never having (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Senor Unoball

    visited Barrow. Thank you for this piece. I appreciate your conundrum over the harvesting of whales... Alaska taught me to appreciate the act of hunting for sustenance. But all these years later, I still deplore the act of hunting for the sake of a trophy.

    I also appreciate your questioning the use of carbon to visit such a place. As a military family, our carbon footprint is far greater than most families... we move often and we move with all our belongings. I often feel like the few things we do to compensate are nowhere near enough. But I also know the act of travel, of meeting people from different cultures, of experiencing a different style of living, is a part of what has helped make me an environmentalist. I wish more people from the US could travel and meet people who think differently than they do. Then they might be more open to the changes that need to occur to save us from climate change. Because it isn't the travel in itself that is the problem - it is the methods we continue to use.

    Enjoy the rest of your time in Barrow! I hope you make some memories of a lifetime.

  •  well one way to reduce carbon emmissions (0+ / 0-)

    is to plant more trees and grasses, as they suck in co2 and store it. Of course to really make an impact we're talking many millions of trees, and in the tundra, planting trees doesn't really work.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site