Skip to main content

While Republicans are just days away from blocking the once-routine debt ceiling increase their own leaders acknowledge would trigger a global economic catastrophe, the whole manufactured crisis has nevertheless spawned a cottage industry in “false equivalence.”  Of course, “both sides” don’t do it. In the modern era, only the GOP has shattered the mark for filibusters, blocked President Obama’s judicial nominations at record rates and refused to confirm any appointees for agencies Congress itself voted to create. And when it comes to their government shutdown and extortion over the debt ceiling, only Republicans have had both the intent and the votes to become what Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), Bush Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill and the conservative Wall Street Journal respectively branded “hostage-takers” and “terrorists” and “kamikazes.”

To illustrate the point, John Hudak and Thomas Mann asked Washington Post readers to consider a hypothetical:

It's 2007. Democrats have just taken control of Congress, and Rep. Nancy Pelosi is speaker of the House. President George W. Bush requests a debt ceiling increase from Capitol Hill. Seeing an opening, Pelosi makes a specific demand: "Under no circumstances will the debt ceiling be lifted unless Congress passes and the president signs a bill providing universal health coverage to Americans, a ban on preexisting conditions and an individual mandate to purchase insurance to avoid the  adverse selection problem." She draws a line in the sand and argues that the number of uninsured people presents an economic, political, social and public health threat to the nation that is far greater than the government defaulting on its debt. She even questions whether a default is real.

If you are a Republican, ask yourself how you would react to Pelosi's threat. Would you think, "Good for her, she's a tough negotiator"? Would you concede, "That's part of bargaining, and the president needs to relent"? No. Her behavior would be slammed. She would be accused of hostage-taking or political terrorism. And that criticism would be deserved.

The criticism would indeed be deserved, if Democrats ever resorted to such blackmail. But they didn’t. And they don't. Not to force universal health care. Not after President Bush vetoed SCHIP in 2007. Not to defund the Iraq war or to force a withdrawal of U.S. troops. And certainly not to fix Medicare Part D, President Bush’s unfunded $400 billion prescription drug program that almost every House Democrat opposed.

As you may recall, the launch of Bush’s Medicare Rx program was bungled so badly that John Boehner called it “horrendous” in early 2006. Still, Democrats in Congress and in the states did everything they could to make the program work. In a moment of actual journalism in July, NBC’s Chuck Todd made that exact contrast with the GOP’s scorched-earth campaign to undo the Affordable Care Act:

Here's a thought exercise on this summer morning: Imagine that after the controversial Medicare prescription-drug legislation was passed into law in 2003, Democrats did everything they could to thwart one of George W. Bush's top domestic achievements. They launched Senate filibusters to block essential HHS appointees from administering the law; they warned the sports and entertainment industries from participating in any public service announcements to help seniors understand how the law works; and, after taking control of the House of Representatives in 2007, they used the power of the purse to prohibit any more federal funds from being used to implement the law. As it turns out, none of that happened.
Of course none of that happened. Because America has only one party of hostage-takers. One hundred forty eight years after the end of the Civil War, it is the Party of Lincoln. As the 16th President put it:
“Both parties deprecated war, but one of them would make war rather than let the nation survive, and the other would accept war rather than let it perish, and the war came.”

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site