Skip to main content

Over and again Republican propaganda outlets have cited (Senator) Obama's vote against raising the debt ceiling as proof of his duplicity or hypocrisy.  When he was a Senator, they assert, he voted against Bush and the Republicans raising the debt ceiling, so what they want to do now is no different.

It is different, very different.

If Bush and the Republicans had not passed a massive tax cut, then launched a completely unnecessary war in Iraq, there would have been no need for a debt ceiling hike.  

This is not an irrelevant historical out.  Clinton ran surpluses and paid down the debt the last two years of his term.  Articles from the time warn about the effects of vanishing US debt on global finance.

Discussions of a tax cut were focused on trying to balance the debt rundown or slow it down.  As MMT (Modern Monetary Theory) demonstrates, government debt is the crucial component of finance and many state economic systems in the fiat currency systems that dominate the global economy.  Bush took these arguments as an excuse to "return money to the taxpayers" to a wholly reckless degree.

Obama ran for Senate on a platform that both denounced Bush's reckless tax cut and his needless war.  Voting down a debt ceiling hike put on the record Obama's point in his campaign that elections have consequences: the 2002, 2004 elections giving majorities to Republicans and electing a Republican President being the case in point.  He ran for president in 2008 making these points over and again.  He has worked to reverse Bush's reckless tax cuts as much as he could, and he has worked to end the unfunded, endless war Bush left him.

The collapse of the economy in 2008 due to Republican gutting of regulatory funding and personnel just hammered the point home about the consequences of electing Republican majorities and presidents.

And now, what's different?

Obama was stuck with cleaning up the Republican mess.  This is not an excuse, it's reality.  And that mess was a lot bigger than nearly anyone thought at the time, or than most realize even now.

First that's a 3 trillion dollar or more tar pit of engagement in the Middle East.  Obama will finally be able to bring that to an end sometime in 2014.  The ongoing costs and mounting costs of veteran and dependents care, however, will, if other wars are any measure, last a century or more.  The interest on the unfunded expenditures--this was the first ever American war in which the Republican president and Republican ruling party did not raise taxes (instead they cut them)--all expenditures of which were unfunded, amounts to tens of billions of dollars in interest due now and for decades in the future.

Second was a multi-trillion dollar, 10 year long experiment of massive tax cuts for the top 1%, promised by Bush and Republicans to create such a boom in jobs and new revenues that it would more than pay for itself.  This experiment was paid for with borrowed money, and failed by every measure to produce anything even close to the promised payoff.  Instead, the concentration of wealth it produced has crippled the American growth machine.  Until this misdistribution is corrected, the US will underperform economically, and hence, the damage inflicted by Republican policies will drag on.

Third, Republican gutting regulatory agencies of fraud investigators and funds threw open the door to massive losses in the private sector, all of which the Republican President loaded onto the government in the TARP program.  These trillions of dollars in loans, grants, and assumptions of liabilities have by no means been paid off despite claims to the contrary.  While TARP's 800 billion or so in funds may be largely repaid, there are huge liabilities that have been assumed by the taxpayers.  These liabilities require active government involvement to prevent them from coming due if private firms misbehave again and fail again.  Insurance against such defaults and fraud are starting to rise along with chances of fraud and consequent defaults.  As foreclosures start to rise again, expect defaults and the knock on effects on credit default swaps and other derivatives to increase.

The Republican shutdown is raising the likelihood that while the government cat is locked away, the rats on Wall Street will run wild again as they did when Bush and the Republicans had a lock on all branches of government.  At one point after 9-11, Bush gutted the FBI fraud investigation division, reducing it to 9 investigators.  It has taken Obama and the Democrats years to recover the hundreds of years of investigative experience and institutional memory the Republicans flushed away.  But even more unsettling and unprecedented is that all this is happening while markets are working increasingly in the dark.  Nearly all government statistics have shut down.  Commodity trades are largely being made without knowledge of current supplies and prices.  At some point, working in the dark will spark a panic, or it will let fraud build up so much that when the lights come on again, then the markets will panic.

Fourth, the states, first under Democrats panicked by the Republican economic collapse of 2008 then even more so, and unnecessarily so, under Republicans after 2010, cut expenditures and jobs.  This has cost the economy enormously and increased the federal deficit as a consequence as well.  Many of the Republican governors and legislators cut taxes for the wealthy, increasing the distortion of wealth distribution even more, and further crippling tax collections for both state and federal levels.  While tax collection has gone up in absolute terms, it has not increased all that much relatively to what it normally would have and should have.  Meanwhile, all the unnecessary unemployment vastly increased both unemployment insurance costs and drove millions out of the employment market altogether.  The prolonged unemployment also drove down wages, and with lower wages, drove down federal income tax collection.

I stop here only because I run out of time to list even more massive, and totally unnecessary, costs Republicans have piled on Obama and the American people.  This is largely their deficit of their making.  And most of Obama's deficit was run up trying to fix their damage.  

That Republicans now insist on inflicting further damage from more cuts in spending and more cuts in taxes while keeping government shut down and the markets hostage to raising the debt ceiling to a level reflecting commitments they already voted on and passed, is truly outrageous.  Elections do have consequences.  We are paying for, and will long be paying for, the consequences of the 2000, 2002, and 2004 elections.  Obama voted against raising the debt ceiling in 2006 (not to shut down government, mind you) to make that point.  

The stance Republicans take now is not so principled.  They won the majority of seats in one half of Congress with a minority of votes, and now they insist that all the other elections for Senate and President are null and void, and without consequence.  They both shirk their responsibility for the deficits they piled up, and the interest on that debt now due.  They deny their policies caused this mess, and deny that they want to make the mess worse with still more wrong-headed policy.  

Their votes against raising the debt ceiling are for reasons entirely unlike those which prompted then Senator Obama to vote against raising the ceiling.  Obama voted to remind Republicans of their follies and their responsibility for the debt.  

They are responsible for this debt, not Democrats, don't forget.  If we had simply stayed the Clinton surplus course, we would have half the national debt we have now.  We would have almost no deficit at all.  (If Clinton's full tax rates applied now as they did in 2000.)  And don't forget, in 2008 when the Republicans managed to collapse the economy with their idiocy, Senator Obama voted for the steps needed to save the US.  

President Obama bent over backwards during his first term to try, vainly to work with Republicans.  He unwisely compromised with them in 2011.  Only now, faced with radical unreason and refusal to accept his re-election by a clear majority, has Obama finally said enough.  Only now, with the validity of majority election and of Senate powers being denied in whole has Reid stood up to Republican House intransigence.  He has yet to kill the Senate Republican minority filibuster powers despite outrageous abuse of it.  

Republicans vote to deny elections by majorities; that is, their stance is against democratic election, not for it.  They vote to deny that elections have consequences.  

This is not a vote like Obama's 2006 Senate vote meant to remind voters of how we got these deficits and that elections for responsible Senators have consequences for better government.  Republicans deny government shutdown hurts Americans, and thus their vote is a vote against government itself.

When push came to shove, Obama voted to save America even if it meant he and Democrats had to pay for Republican folly.  Republicans deny paying for their debt will destroy America's credit with the rest of the world.  They deny their responsibility for governing.  And they are willing to destroy us and democratic majority rule to get their (minority) way.

Republicans are voting to destroy this nation and government for, by and of the people, not save it.    This is NOT equivalent to what Obama did in 2006; it is exactly the opposite.

Originally posted to monkeybrainpolitics on Sun Oct 13, 2013 at 07:25 PM PDT.

Also republished by Global Expats.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (8+ / 0-)

    America needs a UNION NEWS channel. We (unions) have the money, we have the talent. Don't buy 30 second time slots on corporate media, union leaders; fund your own cable news channel and tell the real story 24/7/365

    by monkeybrainpolitics on Sun Oct 13, 2013 at 07:25:09 PM PDT

  •  An excellent review of the debt ceiling jibberish (3+ / 0-)

    from the Shut Down Artists of the Tea Party and Koch Addicts to the bone heads of the GOP in general.

    •  Ever since Reagan, Republicans (4+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      codairem, Lujane, FiredUpInCA, myboo

      tend to project their own behaviors onto Democrats.  The more they rage against irresponsibility, the more you can be sure they are being irresponsible.  The more they rage about nearly anything the more you can be certain that is precisely what they are up to.  Their rage against Obama for "doing the same thing" they are doing makes it certain they are not "doing the same thing".  Thanks for reading and commenting.

      America needs a UNION NEWS channel. We (unions) have the money, we have the talent. Don't buy 30 second time slots on corporate media, union leaders; fund your own cable news channel and tell the real story 24/7/365

      by monkeybrainpolitics on Sun Oct 13, 2013 at 07:53:37 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  You are on to something. Their overuse of (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        monkeybrainpolitics, FiredUpInCA

        projection indicates underhanded antics because they are no longer in the mainstream, but must project a facade of being middle of the road and wholesome.  Unfortunally, for them their deeds escape normalcy as in the case of forcing unwanted, unneeded vaginal ultra-sounds on women.  This soft pedaled in the media  form of facsim is odious to free people everywhere and so they lie and say Obamacare means death panels.  Their pathology is breathtaking, as is their obstruction and obfuscation.  Soon the tide of history and demographics will pass them by and they will be  remembered as a terrible case of acid indigestion to the body politic of Americans.

  •  BIG difference: (3+ / 0-)

    Obama got to vote no on the debt ceiling BECAUSE THEY HELD A VOTE.

    Boehner is refusing to hold votes on the clean CR and (presumably) the Debt Limit because he knows they'd pass, no matter how many vote against.

    America, we can do better than this...

    by Randomfactor on Sun Oct 13, 2013 at 08:17:39 PM PDT

  •  Immediately after Sen Obama spoke on 3/16/06 (3+ / 0-)

    Sen Grassley (R-IA) rose to speak.

    Sen. GRASSLEY. I urge my colleagues to vote in favor of final passage.  Raising the debt limit is necessary to preserve the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government.
    We cannot as a Congress pass spending bills and tax bills and then refuse to pay our bills. Refusing to raise the debt limit is like refusing to pay your credit card bill--after you've used your credit card.

    If the link isn't functional, the transcript is on p. S2238 of the Congressional Record dated 3/16/06.

    A few days ago Grassley was one of the Senators who voted NO on S.1569 A bill to ensure the complete and timely payment of the obligations of the United States Government until December 31, 2014.

    Grassley is the ranking Republican on the Senate Budget Committee but he must have changed his mind about the US paying its obligations since he spoke about seconds after Obama did in 2006.

    There is no existence without doubt.

    by Mark Lippman on Sun Oct 13, 2013 at 08:42:05 PM PDT

    •  Supposedly the Republicans are refusing (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      FiredUpInCA, myboo

      to vote to raise the debt ceiling because they didn't run up this debt--Obamacare and Democrats voting alone in 2009-2010 did this, they claim.  But of course, Obamacare is funded and even saves money over a 10 year period as the Congressional Budget Office itself reported.  And the cost of the wars Republican started, plus interest costs are coming due, and now they refuse to honor those debts.  Grassley is the hypocrite here, and given that he's been a Republican for decades, and that Republicans have been running up debts since Reagan (far more than Democrats have), he can only be described as a deadbeat and a hypocrite.  Thanks for the link.

      America needs a UNION NEWS channel. We (unions) have the money, we have the talent. Don't buy 30 second time slots on corporate media, union leaders; fund your own cable news channel and tell the real story 24/7/365

      by monkeybrainpolitics on Sun Oct 13, 2013 at 09:32:13 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  All that being said (0+ / 0-)

        In retrospect President Obama really wishes that Senator Obama had voted YES or if voting NO hadn't gone to the Senate floor and given his reasons.

        "let's talk about that"

        by VClib on Mon Oct 14, 2013 at 02:27:34 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site