I should probably bone up on this tag before I spew my comment but since the first two articles name drop Neoliberalism and Rawlsian I will risk inserting my theory. Although a mix of those two dropped names might alt delete w/o ctrl my spew. I do believe I may have contemporized my preemption by referencing a branching as well as course change. Yet I may be providing some reference for my theory/plea.
Please, should we not di-Spencer with or laissez faire on the Social Darwinism as a political crack at the wacked? That’s the ticket or horse is a course[!] Is it not Anti-Social Darwism that would apply to the revolution that buck$ evolution?