Skip to main content

That's a serious question. Because it has to be one of those three in order for CNN to come up with this kind of post-election "analysis" of the Virginia governor's race:
Virginia was the first swing state to hold an election after the Affordable Care Act website's troublesome rollout, a controversy that has permeated national news coverage for weeks. Almost 30% of Virginia voters said health care was the most important issue in the race.

(snip) Among all Virginia voters, 53% said they oppose the president's health care law, while 45% said they support it, according to CNN exit polls. A huge majority of those Obamacare opponents -- 80% -- voted for Cuccinelli.

You don't have to be a whiz at statistics to see a problem here. The first section talks about the voters who saw health care as the most important issue in the race, but the second section talks about attitudes toward Obamacare held by ALL Virginia voters. Two different groups, yet the four reporters (does it really take four?) who wrote this article breezily conflated them. The last sentence has absolutely no bearing on whether health care helped Cuccinelli. Of course most Obamacare opponents voted for Cooch. So did most of those who opposed abortion rights. And gay rights. And a hike in the minimum wage. In other words, most conservatives supported Cuccinelli. Duh.

A proper analysis of the impact of Obamacare on the election would have discussed the attitude toward the law of the voters who said that health care was the most important issue in the race, i.e., those who voted on that issue. Also, a proper analysis would have noted that around 10% of Americans say they oppose Obamacare because they don't think it goes far enough, i.e., they are liberals who wanted a greater role for government in our health insurance/health care system.

Did CNN do either of these things? Nope. Instead, the article's section on health care quoted its own pundit (John King), and a partisan Republican:

"Obamacare is toxic," said Brian Baker, president of the Ending Spending Action Fund, a conservative Super PAC that spent half a million dollars backing Cuccinelli. "If the shutdown had ended a week earlier, or the election had ended a week later, Cuccinelli would have won. This is a bad omen for Democrats in 2014."
Wow. Just wow.

For a real analysis, one that does explore these questions properly, there's Greg Sargent at the Washington Post. Remember the part where I asked how the people who actually voted on the issue of health care felt about Obamacare:

According to the exit polls, only 27 percent of Virginia voters saw the health law as the top issue, and among them, only a bare plurality (49-45) supported Cuccinelli. Far more (45 percent) named the economy.
Oh, but the CNN article, if you read it (wrote it?) quickly, led you to believe something very different.

And then Sargent actually explains what opposition to Obamacare means and does not mean:

It’s true 53 percent in the exit polling oppose Obamacare, versus 46 percent who support it. But as we’ve seen, the more fine grained national polling has steadily revealed a small but non-trivial percentage in the opposing camp who disapproves because it doesn’t go far enough, meaning the GOP position is a minority one.
Hey, look at that. Nuanced reporting. Frankly, it's not so much nuance as it is putting a priority on getting the facts right. At the outset I asked why didn't CNN get the facts right. Given that their ratings remain in the tank despite new leadership, that question may not matter much longer.

Originally posted to Ian Reifowitz on Wed Nov 06, 2013 at 11:24 AM PST.

Also republished by Media Whores Exposed, Virginia Kos, and Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

mickey, GainesT1958, Sylv, KeithH, TXdem, Trix, Upper West, Subterranean, BigOkie, Vico, eeff, rubyr, xynz, catullus, Matilda, grover, bostonjay, EricS, SamSinister, whenwego, highacidity, mrblifil, pedrito, denig, fumie, splashy, WeNeedKerry, dksbook, wader, Texknight, NYC Sophia, Eyesbright, Steven Payne, Egberto Willies, Diana in NoVa, Major Kong, zerelda, randallt, Hillbilly Dem, sawgrass727, vcmvo2, Erik the Red, JohnB47, dewtx, stagemom, Brooke In Seattle, Laurence Lewis, sunbro, kaliope, Tool, Tunk, Shotput8, sodalis, zozie, noweasels, begone, kovie, WB Reeves, cybersaur, Kimball Cross, mr crabby, Gorette, global citizen, aloevera, StrayCat, gpoutney, Rosaura, Libby Shaw, JVolvo, sceptical observer, Dinclusin, Clive all hat no horse Rodeo, NancyWH, slksfca, AllanTBG, markthshark, PatConnors, Cronesense, Habitat Vic, paz3, puakev, Dave in Northridge, jayden, Librarianmom, Rumarhazzit, madgranny, JML9999, TomP, Empower Ink, JDWolverton, OleHippieChick, Sixty Something, elwior, Laughing Vergil, Buckeye Nut Schell, lineatus, rssrai, tofumagoo, RandomNonviolence, pickandshovel, Missys Brother, catly, Gemina13, Karl Rover, JamieG from Md, dmhlt 66, maggiejean, prettygirlxoxoxo, enemy of the people, rubyclaire, Glacial Erratic, juca, shortmama, earicicle, mkor7, johnosahon, sfarkash, Larsstephens, ruscle, Railfan, hotdamn, Its the Supreme Court Stupid, estreya, piers, Anima, 2questions, JoanMar, DiegoUK, SoonerG, rja, nirbama, DrTerwilliker, ericlewis0, Oh Mary Oh, slice, annieli, slowbutsure, Nicci August, NormAl1792, CoExistNow, Alice Olson, thomask, BarackStarObama, JWK, enhydra lutris, Caddis Fly, blue aardvark, ratcityreprobate, stlsophos, jham710, AnnetteK, hulibow, OldDragon, anodnhajo, Siri, IndieGuy, tallahasseedem, a2nite, ANY THING TOO ADD, Horace Boothroyd III, stellaluna, This old man, carolanne, belinda ridgewood, Arahahex, MartyM, doroma, wxorknot, Gale Hollis, Greenfinches, pointilleux, Chaddiwicker, Panacea Paola, jusjtim35, Linda1961, poopdogcomedy, 84thProblem, howabout, northerntier, DemInDuluth, Abby Hemani, ET3117, Hey338Too, JustGiaco, danjb, Dodgerdog1, pierre9045, occupyingmodesto, VPofKarma, EPNJ

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site