Skip to main content

Great Video by men for men about what it means to be a man in U.S. culture



Do you warn your son about the "Bro Culture"

14%1 votes
57%4 votes
28%2 votes

| 7 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Where's the diary? (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    SoCaliana, radmul, sturunner
    •  Rape culture Documentary (0+ / 0-)

      watch the video ... that is my diary for now

      •  mixed feelings (0+ / 0-)

        the film actually starts out pretty interesting.

        But when they zoom in on porn, it pretty quickly becomes obvious that they don't know what they are talking about and that they are badly fudging their numbers.

        They start with claiming that the term "gonzo" in general stands for things like jackass(it doesn't) - and then  proceed to (mis)define gonzo porn that way.  From there they spin a tale that there is "hate" porn (there is) which means that gonzo porn is hate porn (complete nonsense) which means that there are thousands of sites of hate porn.

        And for good measure they then mess the whole s/m porn scene into "hate porn".

        Reality is that gonzo porn is basically porn that purposefully (or not) ignores traditional production values in search of authenticity (or just a fast buck). Its basically the "one or two guys with a camera and no script" type of porn. Many people like that, I personally think it's mostly an excuse to deliver a cheap product.

        Now there definitely are "hate porn" (aka misgynistic porn)  sites that operate that way - as well as there are ones that do traditional big set full script based kind of productions.  But they number in dozens, not thousands, as the film claims. And I seriously doubt that their audience is millions and millions of Americans.

        And, basically, around that argument the film completely looses credibility.  And in the later part it doesn't gain any backl - its mostly an off narrator combining seemingly random statistics with an equally random collage of images from films and tv.

        Nice try, but no cigar.

  •  I did indeed watch this video--thanks. (0+ / 0-)

    I'd say lots of the information wasn't new, but the size, lucrativeness, and influence of the porn industry, in the age of the internet, was certainly eye-opening.

    It's here they got the range/ and the machinery for change/ and it's here they got the spiritual thirst. --Leonard Cohen

    by karmsy on Sun Nov 10, 2013 at 09:18:39 PM PST

    •  it was also factually wrong. (0+ / 0-)

      The film is weakest around its excursion on porn. As I explained above, most of what they say there is simply not true.

      •  Why focus on the Porn? (0+ / 0-)

        I don't understand why the over riding message is lost because of the debatable segment on porn. Maybe you could enlighten me?

        Native American from Upper MI

        by Aaniin on Mon Nov 11, 2013 at 08:08:55 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  how credible is a witness (0+ / 0-)

          who lied to you yesterday?

          If they are grossly distorting the picture here, how likely is it that they are grossly distorting the picture in other parts, too?

          Credibility is the core of messaging.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site