Skip to main content

Listen guys:  You may say the testimony leaves out important information but the big issue is that the Obamacare website is a failure and you guys know that, right?  Obamacare was bad from the start and therefore, that has meant the website would be bad in the end.
Oh god....  After the controversy Darrell Issa got himself into by issuing a subpoena to White House Chief Technology Officer Todd Park, do you think he couldn't possibly get anymore clueless with his partisan witch hunting on the Obamacare website?

I hate to disappoint you guys, but he has.

WASHINGTON -- Democrats are accusing House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) of releasing yet another damning excerpt of testimony on the troubled Obamacare website and leaving out important context.

Issa claimed in his release, sent after 7 p.m. on Veterans Day, that the official in charge of running the health care exchanges -- or the "Federal Facilitated Marketplaces" -- found it "disturbing" to have not seen a Sept. 3 memo that seemed to indicate six security risks, including two deemed to be high.

Indeed, Henry Chao, the deputy chief information officer and deputy director of the Office of Information Services at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), acknowledged in a Nov. 1 interview with Issa's committee investigators that it was “disturbing” he hadn't seen the memo and appeared to have been excluded.

But Democratic committee staff pointed out that the memo talks about two specific systems: the "Qualified Health Plans (QHP) and Dental modules." CMS told the Oversight Committee that the relevant parts of those programs will not be online until the spring, meaning they actually pose no security risk now, Democrats said. On top of that, the systems flagged as potentially posing a risk will be used by insurance companies and will not transmit people's personal information, they said.

An administration source confirmed that the "modules" are back-end pieces of the website and that consumers never come in contact with them in the marketplace. The official also said that the problems identified in the Sept. 3 memo have been fixed.

Part of the apparent confusion stems from redactions of the memo. In the two spots where an attachment lists "open high" risks, the specific risks and the areas they affect are blacked out. However, the document does reveal the dates by which CMS officials expect the risks to be fixed -- May 31, 2014, and Feb. 26, 2015 -- which seems to back the Democrats' argument that there is no immediate threat.

Democrats have been willing to admit that the rollout of the health care website is a mess, but they've bristled at what they see as Issa's attempts to hype non-existent problems in order to generate headlines.

“It’s hard to understand why anyone would trust the accuracy of Chairman Issa’s press releases when they consistently distort and manipulate the truth," a Democratic committee staffer said in an emailed statement. "The Chairman’s staff basically sandbagged this witness with a document he had never seen before and then failed to inform him that it has nothing to do with parts of the website that launched on October 1. In fact, it relates to a function of the website that is not currently active and won’t be until the spring of 2014. Rather than seeking out the truth, this press release tries to scare the public by capitalizing on confusion caused by the Chairman’s own staff.”

It has now become apparent that Darrell Issa, as House Oversight & Government Reform Committee Chairman is using his position to do nothing more than to fire up the GOP and Tea Party base, as well as get campaign contributions.

Just think about it:  If Issa continues to pick and chose whatever information that's negative about the website through documents and memos when in a larger picture they don't present a negative light on the roll out, then he's clearly not doing oversight but fundraising and using his stature as Congressman for nothing else.

Another thing to keep in mind is that Darrell Issa is always trying to smooth talk his way out of situations which clearly are his doing, as evident here with Thomas Pickering who was asked by David Gregory on Meet the Press on his willingness to appear on a Benghazi hearing.  Pickering mentions he was told he was not welcome at the hearing in question and that he would come some other time.

DAVID GREGORY:  You're willing to appear?
THOMAS PICKERING:  Of course.  I've said, the day before the hearings I was willing to appear to the very hearings he disclud...excluded me from.  The White House...
Issa interjects
DARRELL ISSA: Woah, woah, woah!
THOMAS PICKERING:  ...Told me back that he said.
DARRELL ISSA:  Please don't tell me I excluded you.
THOMAS PICKERING:  Well, the majority was...  We were told that the majority said I was not welcome at that hearing, I could come at some other time.
DARRELL ISSA:  Well, as the Ambassador just said, the day before the hearing, if the White House said we'd like to have him, there's a procedure.  He could have been the Democratic witness and we would have allowed him.  The Democrats requested no witness.  The fact is, we don't want to have some sort of a stage show.  We had fact witnesses, they testify.  We have the ambassador and Admiral Mullen, who conducted and oversaw the arabi.  We’re inviting them on Monday.  We’ll go through be…not in front of the public but, but in a non-partisan way, questions and answers, and then a hearing obviously, a hearing to follow in an appropriate time.  I’m delighted to have a long-serving career diplomat willing to come before us.  I don’t think it was his decision to say no but we were told no until just before the hearing.
Non-partisan way you're probably wondering eh?  Well, from Issa's track record on launching investigations on the Fast & Furious, Benghazi, IRS, etc., he certainly doesn't know what the meaning of "non-partisan" is.

Now going back to the issue of the investigation, ever since Issa has continued to be criticized by Democrats for how he's handled it, he remains firm on his convictions.  Just look at his Twitter feed:

Yeah, REALLY interested in going after the facts, is he?

Oh this Issa man.  Just like the Energizer Bunny, he just keeps going, and going, and going.

Darrell Issa's Democratic challenger is Dave Peiser and here are the necessary links:

For more information on Peiser and voter registration statistics numbers of CA-49, links are below:

Dave Peiser for Congress:






Here's the voter registration as of February 2013 by the actual CA-49 Congressional District, which combines parts of San Diego and Orange County.  Note the number of Decline-to-State/Independents:

Orange County:  
Democrats:  22,239
Republicans:  44,833
Decline-to-State/Independent:  19,077

San Diego County:
Democrats:  84,282
Republicans:  107,221
Decline-to-State/Independent:  70,938


Democrats:  106,521
Republicans:  152,054
Decline-to-State/Independent:  90,015

Here's the recent polling per PPP showing Darrell Issa vulnerable thanks to the government shutdown:

Disapproval:  49%
Approval:  43%
If you live in or near California's 49th Congressional District and want a reason to start voter registration drives or take part in them, note that San Diego County Democratic Party has a calendar that keeps track of all activity going on, whether local Democratic club meetings or voter registration drive events:

Start firing up the base in CA-49!

Originally posted to Knowledge Democrats on Wed Nov 13, 2013 at 02:14 PM PST.

Also republished by California politics.


Darrell Issa is.....?

13%3 votes
0%0 votes
59%13 votes
0%0 votes
0%0 votes
4%1 votes
22%5 votes

| 22 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site