Skip to main content

Perhaps you saw news over the week regarding the new "Stink Tanks" reports from ProgressNow and the Center for Media and Democracy. In short, the national and state-by-state Stink Tanks reports amass evidence showing how the State Policy Network coordinates a cookie-cutter agenda between its national affiliate groups and its state-based think tank member organizations.

State Policy Network CEO Tracie Sharp took offense to reporting in Politico and The Guardian that noted SPN's national coordination, claiming that each state's SPN think tank is "fiercely independent" when called for comment.

But she lied, and Jane Mayer at the New Yorker just proved it with Tracie Sharp's own words.

Using notes from SPN's annual meeting back in September, Mayer reports Ms. Sharp's admission that rich donors like Koch and Searle drive the SPN groups' priority work:

During the meeting, Sharp also acknowledged privately to the members that the organization’s often anonymous donors frequently shape the agenda. “The grants are driven by donor intent,” she told the gathered think-tank heads. She added that, often, “the donors have a very specific idea of what they want to happen.” She said that the donors also sometimes determined in which states their money would be spent.
Tracie Sharp also proves the cookie-cutter assertions made in the Stink Tanks reports on SPN and its affiliate groups, likening their operating model to IKEA:
Sharp explained what she called The IKEA Model. She said that it starts with what she described as a “catalogue” showing “what success would look like.” Instead of pictures of furniture arranged in rooms, she said, S.P.N.’s catalogue displays visions of state policy projects that align with the group’s agenda. That agenda includes opposing President Obama’s health-care program and climate-change regulations, reducing union protections and minimum wages, cutting taxes and business regulations, tightening voting restrictions, and privatizing education. “The success we show is you guys,” she told the assembled state members. “Here’s how we win in your state.”

Sharp went on to say that, like IKEA, the central organization would provide “the raw materials” along with the “services” needed to assemble the products. Rather than acting like passive customers who buy finished products, she wanted each state group to show the enterprise and creativity needed to assemble the parts in their home states. “Pick what you need,” she said, “and customize it for what works best for you.”

Which "services" do these SPN groups provide with their collective annual budget of $83 million? From the Stink Tanks report:
SPN and its affiliates push an extreme right-wing agenda that aims to privatize education, block healthcare reform, restrict workers’ rights, roll back environmental protections, and create a tax system that benefits most those at the very top level of income.
The State Policy Network and its 63 members (and formal affiliates) like the American Legislative Exchange Council and the Hertiage Foundation, are funded by companies ranging from ExxonMobil to Pfizer to K12, with a backbone of funding and strategic coordination from millionaires and billionaires like Charles and David Koch, Michael D. Searle, William "Jerry" Hume, James Arthur "Art" Pope and Phil Anschutz. These players have a variety of ways to get their money to the SPN groups:

Check out the New Yorker's State Policy Network article for yourself, as well as the Stink Tanks report and previous exposes of the State Policy Network featured in The Nation and Mother Jones.

Originally posted to Connor Gibson on Sat Nov 16, 2013 at 12:14 PM PST.

Also republished by American Legislative Transparency Project.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site