Skip to main content

The Republicans' rabid loathing of the ACA is more than just hatred towards Democrats or the mere lust for power or even racism.  Their whole philosophy of business vs. government is under attack.

Since its inception, the Republican party has supported business interests, often to the exclusion of everyone else.  In the recent past they have branched out to include the religious right and small-government libertarians, but in the main the GOP has willingly been the tool of banks and the largest businesses.

As ideological cover for this prejudice, they have championed economic and social theories which have left a diminished role for government and put majority control of the economy in the hands of the corporatists.  Only business leaders, they have maintained, should make the decisions which affect all our lives.  Government should stay out of it and be well behaved.

It is their fundamental belief that the business community should be unregulated, uninhibited, and unblamed no matter what the consequences.  This conviction is under assault by the introduction of the ACA, and this fact well explains their fervent attacks.  What they are keen to avoid is the revelation that history has proven their philosophy to be false and their agenda to be ruinous.  Their refutation started in one particular state.

When Romney, inspired by the conservative think tank the Heritage Foundation, introduced health care reform in Massachusetts, the dynamic and business model of the health insurance providers was profoundly altered.  Up to that point they were free to charge as much as they could get away with, often with little competition.  If high rates meant that many citizens could not afford health insurance, at least profits were high.

As with the ACA, Romney's plan introduced competition balanced with greatly increased membership, so that insurance companies were offsetting lower rates with volume, so to speak.  This new business model meant that nearly everyone in the state was able to obtain good, affordable policies, and the insurance companies were able to maintain high profits.  Win, win, eh?

The critical thing about this new business model is that it was never chosen by business, but imposed by government.  It is doubtful that the insurance companies would have chosen to run their businesses in this way if not forced by law.  This is the foundation for the unspoken dread animating much of the current Republican opposition to the ACA.  Government action worked.  It must be particularly irksome that the whole plan was thought up and implemented originally by Republicans.

This conflict over the ACA points up a fundamental difference between the D's and the R's over the necessary role of government.  Republicans, in spite of the lessions of history, insist that only business leaders should be determining all the options no matter what the collateral damage.  Democrats hold that prudent and restrained government action can maintain business interests and benefit all of the people at the same time and that this is desirable.

The Republicans think that they can work opposition toward the ACA into the issue which will win it all in the next election, but nearly a year is a long time to keep that pot simmering.  In that time the program will overcome initial glitches and result in vastly expanded coverage, but they will likely develop a screaming fit over something else.  This is how Republicans hope to win.  Democrats should be aiming toward campaigning over what is the fundamental issue at stake.

What is the proper role of government in our lives?  Should it be a mere lapdog to business interests, or should it be implementing prudent laws when shown to be necessary in order to benefit all the American people?  This is an issue Republicans will not want to face.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site