Skip to main content

When Texas voters complained to the Republican-appointed Director of Elections about having to sign a Similar Name Affidavit before casting a ballot in the November 2013 elections, they were apparently being told that they should

blame Wendy Davis for the hassle of having to sign an affidavit to vote—even though were it not for Davis, many could have been disenfranchised entirely.
That about sums it up. Texas Republicans wrote a bill requiring that a prospective voter's name on an acceptable photo ID exactly match the name that was used when registering to vote. And state Senator Wendy Davis (D, Ft. Worth) proposed an amendment that would allow a voter whose name is not an exact match but is "substantially similar" to sign an affidavit that the voter who has presented the photo ID is the same person as the one on the official list of registered voters. Then the Republican-controlled Texas legislature passed that bill, and Republican Governor Rick Perry signed it.

Yet when addressing voter complaints, Rick Perry's appointee Keith Ingram chose to deceptively characterize the bill itself:

As you may know, the legislature passed SB-14 in the 82nd legislative session. Prior to the passage of that bill, a voter like yourself or my mother with a maiden name discrepancy between their approved voter identification and the official list of registered voters did not result in having to sign an affidavit. You and my mother were allowed to sign in and vote without any issue. However, SB-14 changed the law in one important respect. An amendment to the bill in the Texas Senate was offered by Senator Wendy Davis from Fort Worth. This amendment required persons whose name was not an exact match but was “substantially similar” to sign an affidavit that they were the same person and be allowed to cast a ballot.
I wish I were shocked that the Texas Republicans, who continually boast about their record controlling this state, would concoct such a craven scheme trying to shift the entire responsibility for this voter ID mess onto the Democratic legislator who proposed a solution.

At the request of the Lone Star Project, J. Gerald Hebert reviewed Ingram's letter. Here's what he concluded (my emphasis):

The contention by the Texas Secretary of State, particularly as expressed in the attached letter sent by SOS Director of Elections Keith Ingram to a Texas voter who had filed a complaint about having to sign an affidavit at the polls, is grossly inaccurate and appears to be an intentional effort to mislead the voter and to improperly criticize Senator Davis. In my view, such an overt misrepresentation of the facts, combined with an obvious attempt by a state official to launch a partisan political attack, rises to the level of an improper use of official resources for partisan political purposes.
Actually, that's the only reasonable conclusion that an informed reader of that letter could reach.

While Texas Republicans have been busy lying to voters, Texas Democrats have been busy working for change.

 photo 597e32d4-f153-4f46-a03b-c17229341929_zpseac96aee.jpg

That sound you heard was Battleground Texas shattering the goal of 48,000 calls in 48 days to help elect Wendy Davis as our 48th governor of Texas. Yep, more than doubled.

Originally posted to Kitchen Table Kibitzing on Wed Nov 20, 2013 at 05:00 PM PST.

Also republished by Houston Area Kossacks, TexKos-Messing with Texas with Nothing but Love for Texans, and Turning Texas: Election Digest.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site