Skip to main content

A newly announced media has received a great deal of advanced praise from the left, but its owner's political leanings might shape its direction in a way progressives may not like.

Cross posted from Pruning Shears.

Tech billionaire Pierre Omidyar's soon-to-be-launched journalistic venture has been greeted with an overwhelmingly positive response.  In an era of shrinking budgets for news operations, the prospect of a benefactor flush with cash jumping in and starting an investigative outlet seems almost impossibly good news.

The reaction among those who write about the press for a living has ranged from palpable relief to gushing and unqualified praise.  The prospect of joining some of this era's most respected investigators like Glenn Greenwald and Jeremy Scahill along with paragons of journalistic rectitude like Jay Rosen is certainly enough to hope for good things.

Still, it probably isn't a good idea to leap off the deep end over it.  For one, the new outlet might not be a startling and original development as much as the latest nouveau riche status symbol.  Keeping up with the Bezos', as it were.  In addition, it should give one pause to see exactly the kind of uncritical adulation heaped on it that Greenwald has feasted on when practiced by establishment media towards the powerful.  And make no mistake about it, Omidyar is an extremely powerful individual.

Last Friday Mark Ames and Yasha Levine published a story at NSFWCORP about Omidyar's nonprofit group, the Omidyar Network.  (The article has been intermittently unlocked for nonsubscribers.  If you do not subscribe you may hit a paywall.)  This venture has focused in part on privatized microfinance initiatives, and its results there have been grotesque and obscene.  One group it supported, SKS Microfinance, engaged in practices that would have had to improve by orders of magnitude to qualify as Dickensian:

In 2012, it emerged that while the SKS IPO was making millions for its wealthy investors,1 hundreds of heavily indebted residents of India's Andhra Pradesh state were driven to despair and suicide by the company's cruel and aggressive debt-collection practices. The rash of suicides soared right at the peak of a large micro-lending bubble in Andhra Pradesh, in which many of the poor were taking out multiple micro-loans to cover previous loans that they could no longer pay. It was subprime lending fraud taken to the poorest regions of the world, stripping them of what little they had to live on. It got to the point where the Chief Minister of Andrah Pradesh publicly appealed to the state’s youth and young women not to commit suicide, telling them, "Your lives are valuable."2

Ames and Levine also cover the foundation's funding of DonorsChoose in America and Bridge International abroad, both of which focus on privatizing (for profit, of course) public education.  Then there's the debt peddling to the impoverished in Peru.  Simply put, Omidyar is a hard core radical libertarian, a triple distilled true believer in laissez-faire capitalism.  And as an obvious corollary, someone hostile to government.

That is who the new journalistic hires are lending out their good names to.  It surely is no coincidence that they are known for their antagonistic stances towards government: Greenwald for his intelligence reporting,3 Scahill for his unsparing critiques of US foreign policy, and so on.  I won't hold my breath looking for an Occupy Wall Street bureau, though.

I've long admired Greenwald, Rosen, Scahill and the other journalists being brought on, and by all indications they will be free to pursue issues they feel passionate about.  That is a good thing, but a limited thing as well.

For as promising as the new outlet is, it may in the end serve a much less noble purpose.  Someone with a relentlessly antagonistic stance towards government who starts a project that is relentlessly antagonistic towards government will not be broken hearted to see popular trust in government wane.  Or as Ames and Levine put it: "In other words: look out Government, you're about to be pummeled by a crusading, righteous billionaire! And corporate America? Ah, don't worry."

The principals may pledge to be on guard against any signs of hedging or self-censorship, but let's not be naive about this: It will only be acceptable to challenge certain kinds of power over there.  The employees will know who is signing their paychecks, and they will be no more immune to the imperceptible erosion of their standards over time than have been the servile members of the courtier press they have so often criticized.


NOTES

1.Omidyar Network had a major stake in a nonprofit named Unitus,

which holds a stake in SKS that will be worth millions after the I.P.O. The group’s board shocked the nonprofit community this month by saying that all of the organization’s 40-person staff would be laid off and that Unitus would no longer be involved in microfinance activities.
As Woody Allen once said, no matter how cynical you are, you can't keep up.
(Back)

2.The story at the link does not contain Pradesh's quote.  I couldn't find an original source for it, either.  The article is brief and still worth looking at though.  Ames and Levine also link to this longer article on SKS which is well worth a read too.
(Back)

3.The timing on funding an effort against the surveillance state seems curious too; this stuff has been going on for years.  Edward Snowden's NSA revelations seem to have attracted the attention of the right wing grift barkers.  I don't have a problem with strange bedfellows coalitions; I think sometimes it's useful to temporarily partner with groups that one may think are doing the right thing for the wrong reason.  This is particularly true on outsider vs. insider issues like financial crime or, well, domestic spying.  But the ease and credulity with which many on the left seem willing to sign on to empty headed, Gadsen flag waving, lightly repurposed teabagger rallies is a bit disturbing.
(Back)

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site