Skip to main content

For nearly 6 years, experts and pundits have warned how bad Obama would be for the economy, and especially investors and the stock market.

From 2013:
JEFF SAUT: The Stock Market Will Probably Tank After Obama's State Of The Union

That said, this one feels like it will extend towards the State of the Union address slated for February 12th. That address will likely be viewed negatively by the equity markets, which should serve to finally bring about a 5 - 7% correction.

There is always some rationale: Higher tax rates, Uncertainty Obamacare.  Capital gains taxes reduce the incentive to invest.  Investors and business owners are concerned over policy 'uncertainty' and are holding off investment.  Obamacare will reduce businesses incentive to hire because of the additional health care costs.

The general idea is epitomized in Romney's 47% speech.  Obama will take from investors and business owners and give benefits to his constituencies.  This makes investors shy away from productive investments, business owners limit hiring, and high wage earners either work less or drop out completely (go galt).  More arguments on why Obama is bad for business are below.  I know these arguments are weak, but we have an even more powerful counterargument - the course of history.  The next two links are to the general stock market's performance for the past year and since Obama was elected.  Makes me feel like...the 90's.

This is not the most polished argument, but merely a thinking point.  People made concrete predictions - Obama would be bad for stocks - that have been shown strikingly false.  However, there is not nearly as much attention to the fact that they were terribly wrong.  They also continue to make politics-based predictions.  Other people also countered with the experience of the 90's, and how Clinton's tax increases were not bad for stocks or business in general.  There have been other predictions - fed policy would create rampant inflation that have also gone un-addressed as time has shown them to be false.

The argument I like the least is the argument that workers, when their taxes are raised, will work less.  (I dislike the corrollary also - that when their taxes are reduced, they will work more).  I have never known a single person to act in this way.  Most don't know exactly what they pay in taxes, and those that do, don't manage their employment in that way.  They work as much as they need to in order to keep up or advance in their field.  To make such a broad far reaching statement, some examples are needed right?

This is not to say that Obama's economic policies are perfect, or that our current 7% level of unemployment is acceptable.  I wish Obama had been even more progressive in his policies, but that is not the point of this diary.  People predicted a market reaction to Obama that has not materialized.  They should be held accountable for those predictions.

2013 YTD S&P 500
S&P from Nov 2008 - Today

From 2008:
BARACK'S MARKET WIPEOUT

Morris, Hannity, Limbaugh implicate Obama in stock-market decline -- analysts disagree

Market Goes Into Dive in Response to Obama Election

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site