Skip to main content

Both Kuster and Shea-Porter cast their votes in support of the 2014 National Defense Authorization Act, which, unlike the Budget, actually approves spending. That's a worth-while distinction because, unlike state budgets, the federal budget has no legal standing. Which is why Washington has managed operating without an approved budget since 2009. Still, budgets keep getting the attention of the press, so we can't do without them, can we?

(Crossposted from Bluehampshire)

But, perhaps a little more explanation is in order. Shea-Porter's official web site tells us:

The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 would set overall discretionary spending for the current fiscal year at $1.012 trillion—about halfway between the Senate budget level of $1.058 trillion and the House budget level of $967 billion. The agreement would provide $63 billion in sequester relief over two years, split evenly between defense and non-defense programs. In fiscal year 2014, defense discretionary spending would be set at $520.5 billion, and non-defense discretionary spending would be set at $491.8 billion.
"Discretionary spending" refers to the dollars Congress critters control and can use to extort/bribe the electorate for votes. It is to be contrasted with the "mandatory spending" which flows out of the Trust Funds (Old Age and Survivor Insurance, Hospital Insurance, Supplemental Medical Insurance and Disability Insurance), which the critters can only affect, if they do away with them entirely or "reform" them substantially. Which explains the perennial threats to do just that. Message to voters: "if you're not nice, we'll give you the shaft."

The money Congress can play with keeps shrinking compared to the over-all economy. Though the data we have only covers 2012, the Trust Funds, which dispense dollars directly to users and providers of goods and services, rather than funneling dollars through contractors and banks, were already at $1.7 trillion, before the ACA was fully in effect. So, what's happened, in effect, is that Congress has just about privatized itself out of influence (power) and military hardware is about all that's left.

(Which is why Ohio Congressmen are bragging on amending the NDAA to keep Abrams tank upgrades on life support and outfit the National Guard).

"Bloat" is a relative term. On the other hand, "sequester relief" is downright deceptive -- a euphemism to make deprivation more palatable. I'm not sure why they bother. It's only a matter of time before the people figure out that if some people are poor, it's because they don't have enough money (a quantum that's in infinite supply) and hiding some away in the bowels of the Treasury won't give them more. What we have is a mangement problem and Congress abdicating its duties and obligations to the private sector is not helping. Though the shadow economy, circumventing all rules and regulations and reporting requirements to the tune of $2 trillion, is. Thirty billion less rationing in 2014 is too little, too late.

Three elections have replaced 212 members in the House and some incumbents still haven't got the message.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Amber6541, salmo, GAS

    Obamacare at your fingertips: 1-800-318-2596; TTY: 1-855-889-4325

    by hannah on Fri Dec 13, 2013 at 06:01:16 AM PST

  •  So you think NH would elect someone (0+ / 0-)

    to the left of Kuster and Carol Shea-Porter?

    If you are against sane gun regulations then by definition you support 30,000 deaths a year by firearms.

    by jsfox on Fri Dec 13, 2013 at 06:15:54 AM PST

    •  I don't make predictions. I promote (0+ / 0-)

      citizen involvement and recognize that the press, if it is to pay attention, likes a kerfuffle. :)

      Obamacare at your fingertips: 1-800-318-2596; TTY: 1-855-889-4325

      by hannah on Fri Dec 13, 2013 at 06:29:11 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  This is a wonderful non answer. n/t (0+ / 0-)

        If you are against sane gun regulations then by definition you support 30,000 deaths a year by firearms.

        by jsfox on Fri Dec 13, 2013 at 06:38:16 AM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  When Carol was first elected in 2006, (2+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          salmo, GAS

          she replaced a Republican incumbent and bested the Democrats "choice" in the primary with a campaign that cost about $30,000. In 2010 she was targeted by the Koch Brothers, who were irked by the Regional Energy Compact the northeastern states had entered into to reduce emissions. The dolt they put up and promoted out the wazoo lasted one term and then Carol was voted back in in 2012.
          New Hampshire is of interest to Republicans because of its convenient size in which to hold the first Presidential primary and because a bunch of old political operatives have rooted themselves and their rich friends in the state with no sales or income tax.
          Their dollars do not, however, buy them votes, if Democrats make the effort to propose good candidates.

          Obamacare at your fingertips: 1-800-318-2596; TTY: 1-855-889-4325

          by hannah on Fri Dec 13, 2013 at 07:13:54 AM PST

          [ Parent ]

GAS

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site