As farmers were told they would be,
if Gm crops are not as nutritious as we were told they would be,
if Gm foods allow for the domination of several large Big Ag companies, (and if Gm crops are promoted, then there is no real way around that monopolization),
if Gm crops end up being MORE expensive and more work intensive as they now require the use of adding nutrients into the soil to make up for the fungal material and mold that is promoted in the soil devastated by the use of RoundUp, and if Gm crops require more pesticides, just why is it considered scientifically sound to support Gm crops?
Of course then there is also the "promise" of lateral gene transfer! Inside the video recording Don Huber Interview, that I post at the bottom of this diary, there is a "micro" toxin, viral in nature, that is causing infertility due to whatever processes are going on inside the plant world, and then of course, since humans eat the plants, WHAM within 48 hours of eating plants contaminated with this micro entity, infertility and/or miscarriage occurs.
Citation regarding the increase in use of pesticides: Reuters version: http://www.reuters.com/...
European journal version: http://www.enveurope.com/...
Citations regarding the lack of nutrition in Gm crops and foods: http://genok.no/...
From Don Huber: http://www.gmwatch.org/...
Citation regarding the domination and monopolization of Monsanto and three other Big Ag firms hold sway over the "industry" connected to bringing the American people their food: http://www.fooddemocracynow.org/...
Citation: Don Huber Interview: Crop Pathology, Infertility and Miscarriage, brought to us humans via Gm agriculture methods: http://www.youtube.com/...