Skip to main content

"The world's most powerful investment bank is a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money."

Matt Taibbi's memorable description from his 2009 Rolling Stone article has stuck with the giant investment firm Goldman Sachs, but it hasn't stopped them from seeking the latest opportunity to make another bucket of money.

One such opportunity for them has been the proposed Gateway Pacific Terminal in Cherry Point, WA. The terminal, if permitted, will export 48 million metric tons of Wyoming coal to China. Goldman Sachs, as the 49% investor in the Carrix Corporation, was one of two large investors in the planned terminal. The proposal has been fiercely opposed throughout the region for reasons ranging from local impacts to serious concerns about climate impacts.

As Inspector Clouseau would say: "Not any more."

Yesterday it was announced that Goldman Sachs will be looking for new places to put their blood funnel - they have sold their entire investment in the coal terminal.

There are several factors that may have led Goldman Sachs to this decision. One could have been that the market for coal export has been looking grim.

This summer, Goldman Sachs themselves warned that the window for coal exports may be drying up. Quoth the squid:

We believe that thermal coal’s current position atop the fuel mix for global power generation will be gradually eroded by the following structural trends: 1) environmental regulations that discourage coal-fired generation, 2) strong competition from gas and renewable energy and 3) improvements in energy efficiency. The prospect of weaker demand growth (we believe seaborne demand could peak in 2020) and seaborne prices near marginal production costs suggest that most thermal coal growth projects will struggle to earn a positive return for their owners.
At the same time, they were major investors in - yep - a major proposed coal export terminal.

So how long was that situation going to last? Usually, Goldman Sachs manages to keep selling investments that they know are crap, rather than continuing to hold the bag.

And today, the other shoe dropped. Floyd McKay of Crosscut explains:

Goldman may have become impatient with the length of proceedings to secure permits for the $664 million project; intense public opposition, particularly along the thousand-mile rail line from Wyoming, has caused public agencies to call for an intense and lengthy environmental review. Additionally, November’s election in Whatcom County put a new majority on the county’s governing board that is at least skeptical of the coal port and certain to pose detailed questions when asked to approve permits.
The proposed coal terminal is not dead - yet. Another investor, Mexican tycoon Chico Pardo, has stepping in to pick up Goldman's stake. It's just a telling sign when one of the biggest investment banks in the galaxy decides to pick up their marbles.

It matters - a lot - whether these large fossil fuel projects can get financed. When a large piece of infrastructure gets built, it tends to continue to operate for years. This Capital Lock In will create climate damage for decades. This is a big reason for divestment campaigns led and inspired by

But maybe this is the start of something bigger - the start of really large corporations deciding, on the cold hard facts of the matter, the fossil fuel investments are a bad idea.

Our Future - Worth  Saving
Any time you think that you don't have a choice, you actually do.

Any time you think you have to do something that's wrong, you don't.

Not Here
Not Today
Not Any More

We shall not participate in our own destruction.

Previous entries in this series, in chronological order first to most recent:

We shall not participate in our own destruction
Pretty much the dumbest idea ever
Can a community defy a cabal of multi-national corporations?
Great for the coal cabal!  For us, not so much
And So it Begins
Right Brain for This Decision?
101 Reasons to be Concerned About Coal Export
On Refusing to be Rounded out of Existence
Who Are the Welfare Queens Now?
There Is No Daylight
Tis the Season to Decide Our Future
They've Got the Money. We've Got the Humans!
The House of Actual Reality
Collision With Reality
Climate Change and Coal Export - Taking Responsibility
Corps of Engineers Designs Henhouse, Excludes 99 Percent of Chickens
Outsourcing Carbon Pollution: Not So Fast!
Your chance to speak out on a plan that will cause Gigaton level CO2 emissions

Originally posted to Climate Change SOS on Thu Jan 09, 2014 at 12:22 AM PST.

Also republished by Climate Hawks, DK GreenRoots, and PacNW Kossacks.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site