Skip to main content

U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) speaks to the media about an immigration reform on Capitol Hill in Washington June 18, 2013.  REUTERS/Yuri Gripas
Now he's the villain?

Republicans aren't blocking benefits for the long-term unemployed, the New York Times' Jonathon Weisman reports, because they're heartless bastards who don't care about the unemployed. No, it's all Harry Reid's fault, he says.
WASHINGTON — With his strong-armed change to the filibuster rule and an iron-fisted control of the Senate floor, Senator Harry Reid has engaged in the greatest consolidation of congressional power since Newt Gingrich ruled the House, unleashing a bitterness that may derail efforts to extend unemployment insurance.

Mr. Reid of Nevada, the majority leader, on Thursday dismissed all proposed Republican amendments to the unemployment extension, even those drafted by Republicans who had handed Democrats a victory on Tuesday by voting to take up the bill. [...]

A Republican effort to try to reopen the amendment process failed on a party-line vote, 42 to 54, setting up a showdown next week that is likely to end in the bill’s demise, Democrats conceded.

Please read below the fold for more on Reid's involvement in blocking unemployment reform.

Weisman uses the example of an amendment from Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-NH) that was rejected. He writes that the amendment simply requires "applicants for the child tax credit to have Social Security numbers," and that Reid rejected amendments like this in typical "brutish style." What Ayotte's amendment really does is punish undocumented immigrants and their U.S.-born citizen children by making them ineligible for the refundable Additional Child Tax Credit by requiring the parents have a Social Security number to claim the credit. That's a poison pill, as nearly all Republican amendments have been since Democrats took control of the chamber in 2007.

What Weisman also fails to acknowledge is that Republicans have routinely held unemployment benefits hostage since President Obama took office. Up until 2009, unemployment insurance didn't have to be paid for by cuts in other domestic spending. It was always categorized as emergency spending that did not require pay-fors. That all changed when Obama became president.

Instead what we get is a scathing profile of Reid's Senate leadership: this is an "uncompromising power play," one in a series of "slaps in the face" to Republicans; a "brutish style" of "uncompromising control over the process." He does allow Reid to respond, including Reid's assertion that "Republicans refused to agree to any reasonable limit on amendments despite his overtures." What Weisman doesn't say is that Republicans wanted 26 amendments to be considered for this bill. That's not a reasonable limit for a single, relatively simple, bill. Weisman also ignores the big picture of Republican obstruction in his discussion of this ongoing fight over amendments: the fact that Republicans try to bring dozens of amendments to every bill to gum up the works; the explosion in filibusters since Obama became president; the fact that Republicans have used every procedural tactic in the book to make every nomination, every piece of legislation drag out as long as possible if not die.

Republicans have to be crowing that they got the bastion of liberal media to publish a story that not only lets them off the hook for derailing this extension of unemployment benefits, but blames it all on Reid.

Originally posted to Joan McCarter on Fri Jan 10, 2014 at 08:33 AM PST.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site