Skip to main content

Trumpy the adorable snow troll says winter storms disprove global warming and that makes him a happy, relevant troll
No blurry Yetis were captured on shaky cameras frolicking in the polar vortex that plunged almost the entire US into a bitter deep freeze last week. At least there's been nothing on animal planet the Bigfoot channel about it ... yet. But human snow trolls were definitely out in force and in sharp focus. Per usual Fox led the cable news assault on science in the New Year. Snow trolls do what they do for two reasons: they're paid, in some cases very well. And it works. Chris Mooney pointed out why here:
The result was striking: "For each 3.1 ° Fahrenheit that local temperatures in the past week have risen above normal, Americans become one percentage point more likely to agree that there is 'solid evidence' that the earth is getting warmer," the study found. And vice-versa: Cold weather anomalies were associated with decreased belief in global warming.
Which brings up a big, fat ethical question about the goose, the gander, and the ends versus means. Go below the fold and weigh in.

In all fairness, the money is very good. Giving really rich, really powerful people the answer they want to hear, especially when it's the wrong answer, is a time-honored, lucrative trade stretching back to the dawn of written history. That's how you end up with highly educated lawmakers earnestly stating that cutting jobless benefits is actually good for the unemployed, or claiming ketchup is a vegetable. Make the check big enough and flocks of less than scrupulous ER docs will beat a path to the palace doors with one hand on a Bible and the other in the air ready to swear under oath that decapitation isn't fatal. If there's a wealthier industry on Earth right now than extracting and distributing fossil fuels, I don't know what it is. There's always been a ready supply of people, some desperate and others simply greedy, willing to lie their asses off for just a shot at the kind of money we're talking about here.

If trolls will be trolls for fun and profit, and snow trolling has the added benefit of working, and if we further infer that heat trolling would likewise work for similar reasons, would it be unethical to respond in kind to the snowy variety the next time the upper Midwest or Northeast swelters under record triple digit temperatures? Let us compare and contrast the issue.

Note that there is no evidence for recent global cooling right now; therefore using a winter storm to promote the idea of cooling is at best erroneous, if not downright dishonest. But there is sure as hell evidence for global warming over the last several decades, so using a heat wave to hammer that point home is at least slightly less revolting. Since the global temperature record shows an undeniable, measurable increase over the last century, and since a ferocious heat wave over a large region is a legit datum in that very record, is it even fair to call it heat trolling?

Another consideration: it's not as if snow trolls will play fair if we do. They're going to troll their little snowy brains out regardless. If one side advances the wrong side of an argument using an effective tactic, and the other side does not follow suit promoting the accurate view, guess which side has the advantage on an issue where the consequences of inaction might include billions dying in a man-made extinction event or global resources wars?

Then again, even with all the justifications and more, a sense of conflict is understandable. It just doesn't feel quite right, even if using consistent ethics and avoiding hypocrisy hands us a big disadvantage in the PR wars. But if it's done in a scientifically defensible manner, in much the same way we might use a big meteor strike to argue for funding to detect much larger potential impacts or the common outbreak of a winter cold to make a case for preparing for a bird flu pandemic, that would make sense in my opinion. But that's just my view, there's a poll and a comment section below for your thoughts. Let the games begin!



Should the findings of legit climate science be promoted by, for lack of a better term, heat-trolling?

37%689 votes
20%365 votes
11%200 votes
30%554 votes

| 1818 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site