Skip to main content

Wisconsin's Republicans have a new twist on taking away choice that is sure to please the ladyfolk:  Allowing the woman's husband, parents or mother and father-in-law to stop a planned abortion.

Under an obscure provision of SB 201, which provides injunctive relief for a "parent or a grandparent," particularly meddling inlaws who got wind of a planned abortion could go to court and get an injunction against the abortion provider, ordering them not to perform the abortion:
 

(b) Injunctive relief. A court may issue an order enjoining a person from performing an abortion contrary to s. 253.103. If the person violates the terms of the injunction, the court shall adjudge the person in civil contempt of the order and shall impose a civil penalty against the person for contempt in an amount of $10,000 for a first violation, $50,000 for a 2nd violation, and $100,000 for a 3rd and for each subsequent violation and may grant any other relief the court determines is just and proper in the circumstances.

The only catch, supposedly, is that the mother-in-law must have some sort of evidence that the abortion will be performed "solely on account of the sex of the child." Of course, the bill doesn't give any direction on how to determine when this threshold has been met.

For example, the inlaws could get wind-of a planned abortion at clinic X, go to court claiming that this was a gender abortion based on previous pro-boy or pro-girl statements of the daughter-in-law.   This law is so vague, that such a claim by the mother-in-law could be enough to get an injunction on the abortion.

Even if the meddling inlaws don't win, simply filing a claim would allow her to open up her daughter-in-law's personal medical records for court inspection, and force the daughter-in-law to answer to a court for her lawful decision to end a pregnancy.

Finally, what every Wisconsin woman wants:  Their inlaws making their health decisions for them.

Reached by email, the Executive Director of NARAL Pro-Choice Wisconsin, Jenni Dye, said, "Bills like this one are part of a concerted effort to chip away at abortion access. By opening providers to litigation, this bill seeks to make abortion more costly or, even worse, allow a patient's partner, parents, or partner's parents to sue the abortion provider to prevent a patient from making her own personal medical decision and potentially opening her private medical records to inspection in court proceedings."  Dye also added, "If the anti-choice sponsors of this bill were really interested in ending the type of devaluing of one gender over another that underlies sex selective abortion, they would join women in supporting policies that promote equality. Instead, we've seen them do the exact opposite - supporting divisive and discriminatory policies like interfering in women's private medical decisions, repealing equal pay protections, and continuing attacks on women's access to quality affordable reproductive healthcare."

This bill has already passed in the Wisconsin assembly by a 58-39 margin.  In the Senate, it has been passed out of committee and bill sponsor Glenn Grothman, is demanding a senate vote in the coming weeks.

More at Uppity Wisconsin.

Originally posted to Jud Lounsbury on Mon Jan 13, 2014 at 12:46 PM PST.

Also republished by Badger State Progressive, Democracy Addicts, Pro Choice, and This Week in the War on Women.

Poll

Who do you like having make health decisions for you?

2%65 votes
0%2 votes
17%407 votes
0%3 votes
0%5 votes
78%1776 votes

| 2267 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Pat K California, JWC, Sylv, dragonlady, True North, Mikey, Gooserock, madmsf, meg, eeff, dpeifer1949, Christian Dem in NC, concernedamerican, annrose, whenwego, roses, jalbert, splashy, antirove, NMRed, psnyder, Eyesbright, Steven Payne, 2dot, dkmich, Diana in NoVa, Occulus, mungley, solesse413, Gowrie Gal, rapala, historys mysteries, marina, radarlady, NoMoreLies, BluejayRN, blueyedace2, stagemom, Ice Blue, Brian B, Themistoclea, ruleoflaw, Esjaydee, twigg, JVolvo, ER Doc, middleagedhousewife, CA Nana, Clive all hat no horse Rodeo, blueoregon, kurt, orrg1, FlamingoGrrl, bear83, Habitat Vic, Matt Z, dconrad, Empower Ink, Involuntary Exile, skohayes, alasmoses, Calamity Jean, tofumagoo, Cassandra Waites, TokenLiberal, Jeff Y, petulans, JamieG from Md, JBL55, madtowntj, Throw The Bums Out, Donkey Hotey, zephyr108, Carol in San Antonio, earicicle, MKSinSA, Black Mare, piers, mookins, Polly Syllabic, Puddytat, Oh Mary Oh, theKgirls, StateofEuphoria, La Gitane, lexalou, Sand Hill Crane, deeproots, marleycat, Jasonhouse, Santa Susanna Kid, enhydra lutris, peregrine kate, stevie avebury, blue aardvark, SteelerGrrl, stlsophos, Alfreda89, Sister Inspired Revolver of Freedom, Siri, IndieGuy, barkingcat, a2nite, JGibson, joeschmeaux, jan4insight, BusyinCA, George3, Kayjay, peptabysmal, live1, Most Awesome Nana, madcitysailor, GeoffT, Ashes of Roses, isewquilts2, Lily O Lady, Chaddiwicker, The grouch, kideni, poopdogcomedy, gypsytoo, Joy of Fishes, howabout, chocoholic, GreenMother, Avilyn, ET3117, Hey338Too, Theodore J Pickle, Jim Domenico, ChristineM, TheDuckManCometh, Mark Mywurtz, Dodgerdog1, ExpatGirl, kkkkate, ginimck, Arkenstark, swilliamrex

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site