Skip to main content

Bipartisan Congressional attempts to impose new sanctions on Iran just when President Obama's diplomatic efforts are part of a paradigmatic breakthrough in U.S.-Iranian relations, and in Iran's engagement with the rest of the world, is not just reckless and dangerous, it is despicable and unconscionable. There is no excuse for it. If the goal is both national and international best interests, there is no rationale for it. If this effort succeeds, history likely will look back on it as among the worst foreign policy blunders ever, right up there with the disasters of July 1914.

It's easy to criticize the brutality of the current Iranian regime, but that brutality is the direct consequence of August 19, 1953, when the Eisenhower Administration, at the behest of the British government and the British oil company now known as BP, destroyed Iran's fledgling secular democracy, and imposed a brutal dictatorship. Brutality begets brutality, and anyone who thinks a brutalized people will simply shake off its collective trauma need only look to the lessons of the French and Russian Revolutions, or the ongoing turmoil in modern Egypt and Libya. More to the point, it's not as if the United States demands high moral standards of its economic and political allies around the globe, and given, for example, that ugly history of the U.S. in Iran, it's not as if the United States can claim any moral high ground of its own. But President Obama reached out toward Iran, when he acknowledged the U.S. outrage of 1953, and his diplomatic efforts have met a partner in the new reformist Iranian President Hassan Rouhani. With Russia, China, France, Britain and Germany also on board with the new nuclear arms agreement, efforts to scuttle it are nothing less than fomenting war.

Diplomacy is working. The threat of war with Iran has been decreasing. The threat of Iran becoming a nuclear power has been decreasing. Any person with any interest in peace, in Iran continuing on the path toward moderation and constructive engagement with the world's economic and political powers, and in potentially taking a huge step toward defusing the entire Middle East tinderbox, has to be encouraged by the historic first steps included in the deal between Iran and the world's six great powers. Anyone attempting to undermine it must have their intelligence, morality, and sense of basic human decency questioned. This is that big. This is that important. Because if new sanctions are imposed, and the Iranian hardliners are empowered by Rouhani's being insulted or rejected by the United States, and Iran resumes work on its nuclear weapons program, the consequences are unthinkable. For Iran, it could mean another generation lost to extremism. For Iran's neighbors, it could mean a nuclear armed extremist Iran. For the United States, it could mean horrendous choices between watching the development of a nuclear armed extremist Iran or going to war to prevent it. For the Iranian people, so many of whom so eagerly desire democracy and moderation and reengagement with the world, it could mean the same hellish carnage with which neighboring Iraq is still suffering.

If the U.S. Congress imposes new sanctions on Iran, thus scuttling the diplomatic breakthrough forged by President Obama, President Rouhani, and Russia, China, France, Britain and Germany, the consequences a disaster of historic scale. If the nuclear talks collapse, and Iranian reform is destroyed, and the risk of a nuclear armed Iran again rises, some form of war will become almost inevitable. And many innocent people will die. And everyone who helped impose the sanctions will be personally responsible for all of it. Attempts to impose sanctions, and thus scuttle the nuclear deal, are in effect, if not explicit intent, nothing less than warmongering. No Democrat should go near such an effort. Any Democrats who do deserve not only to have their ambitions for higher political office destroyed, they also deserve to have their current political careers ended.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Meteor Blades, Mark Sumner, claude, GainesT1958, buffalo soldier, chuck utzman, PrahaPartizan, Odysseus, AaronInSanDiego, tikkun, Jay C, LeftHandedMan, chipoliwog, EricS, CanadaGoose, farmerhunt, artebella, Redfire, Texknight, psnyder, Eyesbright, kj in missouri, lcrp, Major Kong, Vicky, lyvwyr101, eztempo, Longwing, 3goldens, democracy inaction, sc kitty, Inland, lotlizard, Sandino, peacestpete, Indiana Bob, mightymouse, Jim P, Patriot Daily News Clearinghouse, 417els, KenBee, eglantine, global citizen, agnostic, JVolvo, unclebucky, Spock36, Randian, blueoregon, kurt, Friend of the court, BeninSC, hooper, Habitat Vic, Dartagnan, LillithMc, ethelthe, Mary Mike, Matt Z, deepeco, JML9999, on the cusp, GideonAB, MikePhoenix, OleHippieChick, Sharon Wraight, tofumagoo, royce, RandomNonviolence, brasilaaron, Mayfly, CIndyCasella, MufsMom, jarbyus, Alex Budarin, maryabein, Denise Oliver Velez, Thutmose V, stevenwag, collardgreens, Railfan, The Jester, Observerinvancouver, JoanMar, psychbob, Jack McCullough, DrTerwilliker, cocinero, annieli, Bluefin, Teiresias70, Liberal Panzer, looking and listening, Claudius Bombarnac, BarackStarObama, TRPChicago, erichiro, bakeneko, leftykook, NedSparks, Mathazar, Rejoinder, quill, Chrislove, IndieGuy, Jakkalbessie, just want to comment, a2nite, This old man, reginahny, Buckeye54, George3, Hammerhand, newinfluence, remembrance, Tim DeLaney, AvisPlover, northerntier, Icicle68, Rwickwar, Retroactive Genius, OregonWetDog, RUNDOWN, Dodgerdog1, Old Sailor, CJB2012

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site