Skip to main content

Last night, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie answered questions about his administration's Fort Lee lane closure scandal for the first time since his two-hour press conference and based on what he said, he's settled on his defense: That he sucks as governor.

Well, he didn't literally say that—but he might as well have. Here's the case he made:

Speaking for the first time since a former Port Authority official said that "evidence exists" to contradict the governor's blanket denials about his knowledge of the lane closings on the George Washington Bridge, the New Jersey governor waved off the suggestion that he wasn't being forthcoming.

"The most important issue is, did I know anything about the plan to close these lanes? Did I authorize it, did I know about it, did I approve it—did I have any knowledge about it beforehand?" he said during a regularly scheduled appearance on an "Ask the Governor" segment on WKXW radio in New Jersey.  "And the answer is still the same: it's unequivocally no."

So, according to Christie, the most important issue here isn't that his staff thought lane closures were an acceptable political weapon, or why his staff thought that—the most important issue is the accuracy of his claim that he didn't know precisely what they were planning on doing. Think of it as the plausibly incompetent buffoon defense: Christie is basically saying that people shouldn't hold it against him that he's got a bunch of staffers who did something bad because he's such an out-of-touch boss that he didn't know what they were up to.

Please read below the fold for more on Christie's knowledge of Bridgegate.

Of course, even if he's telling the truth, that doesn't explain why the culture in his office apparently fostered such thuggery, and leaves open the possibility that this sort of behavior was condoned with a wink and a nod by a governor who intentionally avoided learning the details of what his staff was doing precisely so he could deny knowledge if and when it ever became public.

Moreover, his answer continued a pattern of Christie subtly changing his story about what he knew and when he knew it. In the scandal's early days, Christie said he hadn't even heard about the lane closures until after they had ended. But on Friday, his former high school classmate and Port Authority appointee David Wildstein—who with Christie's Deputy Chief of Staff oversaw the lane closures—said that he had evidence that Christie knew about the lane closures while they were happening.

Wildstein hasn't produced evidence backing his claim, but nonetheless Christie's story has changed from claiming that he didn't know about the lane closures until after they had ended to him not knowing about the plot to close the lanes before they began.

Christie later continued: "Here's the thing that I find so interesting, because what's going on now with all this other stuff is just a game of gotcha. When did I first learn about this or that, well, the fact of the matter is, I've been very clear about this. Before these lanes were closed, I knew nothing about it, I didn't plan it, I didn't authorize it, I didn't approve it. I knew nothing about it."
It's a subtle shift, but it appears to be a calculated effort by Christie to change his story to something that's consistent with the evidence Wildstein claims to have. Ultimately, it would be a big deal if Christie knew about the lane closures while they were happening because it would raise the question of why he didn't stop them. (His explanation would certainly be that as a plausibly incompetent buffoon he believed it was a traffic study.) But it's also a big deal that Christie's story is changing about what he knew and when he knew it. And it's yet another sign that he's not just fighting to stay on the 2016 radar: He's fighting to save his second term.

Originally posted to Daily Kos on Tue Feb 04, 2014 at 08:35 AM PST.

Also republished by Christie Investigations.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site