Skip to main content

Who is Grover Norquist?  How does this one man command the allegiance of over 200 Representatives and Senators in Congress?  And why would those Representatives and Senators decide that this one man is more important than their constituents?

One of the biggest obstacles to ultimately developing a workable and humane budget is the prospect of closing tax loopholes for corporations and the wealthiest 2%.  You see, a couple hundred Representatives and Senators signed a pledge to not raise taxes under any circumstances.  How ridiculous.

By signing a pledge opposing raising any new taxes, these “servants of the public interest” have become mere ideologues – uncompromising, unbending.  They have ceased representing their constituents and have pledged themselves to Grover Norquist.

More below the squiggle of doom...

He is the head of the advocacy group (read: lobbyist for) Americans for Tax Reform.  He was asked to form this group by St. Ronald Reagan himself, elevating him to near religious status among neo-Conservatives.  Ostensibly, this group was to advocate to reduce the percentage of GDP consumed by the federal government.  However, the primary weapon in achieving this has been opposing any tax increases under any circumstances.  But let’s call it what it is: a group of wealthy people protecting their own wealth at any cost.

You see, Grover Norquist is no hardscrabble success story, pulling himself up by his bootstraps, which happens to be the favored meme of Republicans who oppose any programs that help the less fortunate among us.  No, Grover Norquist was born into wealth.  Lots of it.  His father was a vice president in Polaroid Corporation.  At 12 years old, he volunteered for Nixon’s 1968  Presidential campaign.  He received his BA and MBA from Harvard.  He served as executive director of the National Taxpayers Union and the College Republicans and served as Economist and Chief Speechwriter for the US Chamber of Commerce. This is a man who has never lacked for anything in his life.

Socially, he has supported positive initiatives for Islamic-American relations, serves on the board of GOProud, an advocacy group representing the conservative LGBT community, and supports pulling American forces out of Afghanistan.  So, this is not a heartless individual.  Just a misguided one.

There are certainly problems with the amount of money consumed by the federal government.

At this point in American History, the government has borrowed so much money from Social Security that an important  program that we have ALL contributed to in with the promise that we will have a safety net when needed is now in serious danger.   We are involved in expending billions and billions of dollars nation building in two countries, while the poor and needy languish unassisted and without health insurance here at home.  Corporations and banks operating under almost no regulation, thanks to one of the few bi-partisan efforts in recent history, caused economic collapse and were rewarded for their efforts by being “bailed out” with billions of dollars in taxpayer funds.

However, Americans for Tax Reform have not targeted these issues as areas in which the government can cut back.  Instead, they have actively opposed health care reform, the Departments of Education and Energy (although they were surprisingly silent on the huge expansion of government that occurred with the Department of Homeland Security), expansion of human services programs, and they openly question global warming on purely economic grounds.

Here is the reality: by opposing tax increases across the board, Grover Norquist and ATR have contributed to the increasing gap between rich and poor in this country.  The tax loopholes that President Obama has proposed closing affect primarily the richest 2% of Americans and the largest corporations -  corporations that have shipped jobs overseas and stocked money offshore while paying historic lows in taxes thanks to favorable tax breaks and loopholes.  He is protecting himself and the wealthiest 2%.  He is protecting wealth and the maintaining of wealth.  He is NOT protecting actual “job creators” or the working class.

So, why would OUR representatives in government beholden themselves to a wealthy scion whose singular mission is “reduce it [government] to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub”?

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Social Security is Not In Serious Danger (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    except from those who say it is.

    We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for victims of our nation and for those it calls enemy.... --ML King "Beyond Vietnam"

    by Gooserock on Tue Feb 04, 2014 at 10:10:04 AM PST

    •  If the Federal government (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Mother Shipper

      had not borrowed from it to balance the budgets for the past 45 years, I would agree without reservation.  That particular boondoggle is courtesy of both major parties.

      •  Social Security is not running out of money... (0+ / 0-)

        ...and it's only mentioned as being in trouble by those who want to cut or eliminate benefits.

        •  And the Trustees: (2+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          bgm1969, terrybuck
          Social Security’s total expenditures have exceeded non-interest income of its combined trust funds since 2010, and the Trustees estimate that Social Security cost will exceed non-interest income throughout the 75-year projection period. The deficit of non-interest income relative to cost was about $49 billion in 2010, $45 billion in 2011, and $55 billion in 2012. The Trustees project that this cash-flow deficit will average about $75 billion between 2013 and 2018 before rising steeply as income growth slows to the sustainable trend rate after the economic recovery is complete and the number of beneficiaries continues to grow at a substantially faster rate than the number of covered workers.
          Growing cash deficits (that can only be funded with general revenues) projected to "rise steeply" after 2018 could realistically be viewed as "trouble".

          The Trustees recommend that changes be made sooner rather than later:

          Neither Medicare nor Social Security can sustain projected long-run programs in full under currently scheduled financing, and legislative changes are necessary to avoid disruptive consequences for beneficiaries and taxpayers. If lawmakers take action sooner rather than later, more options and more time will be available to phase in changes so that the public has adequate time to prepare.
          I'm not saying "the sky is falling", but I don't read this as "move along....nothing to see here".


  •  Grover Dumbquist (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Any representative of the people who signs an agreement to ignore their will is guilty of treason, period!  We should put a contract out on all of them....but first, Mr Dumbquist....

  •  They defied Grover with tax increases (0+ / 0-)

    after Obama's reelection. I think his star is fading.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site