Skip to main content

If you came home from school waving your latest test in your hand, do you think your Mom and Pop would be glad to see a Big Fat Zero on it?

Yeah, be neither. But that's what 48 House Republicans got on the League of Conservation Voters Scorecard for 2013 (PDF) released today.

In the Senate, 17 Republicans scored "Below 10."

Now 10 might sound pretty high, right?

Not when you're scoring out of 100.

By contrast, 72 House Democrats scored "Above 95", which is a A+ in my book.

Three Democratic lawmakers -- California Reps. Linda Sánchez, Scott Peters and Jared Huffman -- received perfect scores.

In the Senate, 30 Democrats---natch---received scores of 100. From Greenwire (sub):

This scorecard is a disturbing reflection of the extent to which the Republican leadership continues to cater to tea party climate change deniers," LCV Senior Vice President of Government Affairs Tiernan Sittenfeld said in a press call today.

LCV officials noted that the average GOP score dropped to a "staggering low" of 5 percent in 2013, down from 10 percent in 2012 and 17 percent in 2008. The average score for all House lawmakers in 2013 was just 43 percent.

According to a Greenwire review of the environmental group's report -- which grades House lawmakers on 28 bills and senators on 13 measures that came up in 2013 -- half of House lawmakers, all of them Republicans, failed to score higher than 11 percent on the assessment.
On that note, please Vote in the Poll:
Poll

Who Gets The Fattest F on the Environment?

27%11 votes
22%9 votes
42%17 votes
7%3 votes
0%0 votes

| 40 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site