Skip to main content

When it comes to climate change delay is denial. Anyone who does not acknowledge that immediate steps must be taken to dramatically reduce emissions is by implication denying the scientific fact that precious little carbon sequester capacity remains for us to use without exceeding 2c warming. The difference between delayers and deniers is more rhetorical than substantive. They share the same policy positions and goals. It's just that the delayer is the good cop to the denier's bad cop. Inhofian madhattery lets the Landrieu and Manchin types sound somewhat scientifically sane when they say "of course we eventually will have to do something about climate change, but not yet."

The Democratic Senate leadership has just chosen climate change delayer Mary Landrieu to be chair of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. Let that sink in.

Landrieu (D, Big Oil), one of Mother Nature News Network's five Democrats who don't get global warming, is surpassed only perhaps by Joe Manchin (D, Big Coal) in anti-environmentalism on our side of the aisle.

Her lifetime League of Conservation Voters score barely breaks 50%, and she was one of LCV's dirty dozen in 2008.

She supports ammending the Clean Air Act to prevent the EPA from regulating greenhouse gas emissions.

She and her Republican cosponsor on that bill have been two of the biggest recipients of Big Oil campaign contributions.

She and Mark Begich made opposition to the "Close Big Oil Tax Loopholes Act" a bipartisan affair.

She even joined the most notorious climate denier in the Senate, James Inhofe (R, Crazytown), in voting to elimate federal spending to reduce CO2 emissions.

Just this summer she echoed rightwing anti-regulatory rhetoric in attacking the president's call for action on climate change.

Landrieu supports construction of export infrastructure to facilitate the rapid expansion of production of the worst oil on earth for climate change, even as we stand of the precipice of global catastrophe.

Her position on tar sands extraction and exports is inconsistent with scientific facts on action necessary to keep warming below the 2c threshold. Delay is denial.

This list could go on and on. No doubt some commenters will find some concilliatory statements and favorable votes by Landrieu, but we're not fooled by the good cop/bad cop routine. There's no doubt that Landrieu is a climate action delayer. In my book, delay is denial. With Democrats like these, who needs Republicans? We're not looking for kinder gentler corporatism.

Kossacks, please, walk me back from this ledge. When the Democratic leadership betrays environmentalists repeatedly, why should we continue to vote Democratic?

Yes, I understand the significance of Landrieu's seat for retaining control of the Senate, and I understand Big Oil's pull in her state. Yes I've heard (and sometimes given) all the arguments against "purism." But here's the thing: if we have a slim majority and pragmatic defectors on every issue (a different defector for each issue) then we still lose every vote. We may as well have a Republican majority, in that case. It's just a mathematical fact that purism has it's place. If we've got defectors on every issue then we keep losing.

Originally posted to play jurist on Wed Feb 12, 2014 at 03:25 PM PST.

Also republished by Climate Change SOS.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site