Skip to main content

Same-sex couple Steven Bridges (L) and Michael Snell exchange rings after filling out a marriage license at the City Hall in Portland, Maine December 29, 2012.  Same-sex couples can start marrying on December 29 in Maine, a state that made history on Elec
Victory, for now, in Indiana, as that state's Republican Senate won't be acting on the amendment and won't be sending it to voters in 2014.
The state Senate advanced a House version of a proposed amendment banning gay marriage Thursday without debate. But because the House stripped out a sentence barring civil unions last month, the amendment process must start fresh.
Indiana law requires proposed constitutional amendments to pass two consecutive session of the Legislature with the same language before being put to voters. The gay marriage ban passed in 2011 with the civil unions language included.
The soonest the ban could come before voters is 2016. So, while this fight might not be totally over, its postponement is very likely its death knell. When a Republican legislature in Indiana can't manage to get an anti-equality bill passed, you know we're moving in the right direction. Congratulations to Freedom Indiana coalition for this victory.

Originally posted to Joan McCarter on Thu Feb 13, 2014 at 11:51 AM PST.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (31+ / 0-)

    "The NSA’s capability at any time could be turned around on the American people, and no American would have any privacy left, such is the capability to monitor everything. [...] There would be no place to hide."--Frank Church

    by Joan McCarter on Thu Feb 13, 2014 at 11:51:37 AM PST

  •  Might be moot by 2016 anyway (11+ / 0-)

    if the right court case comes before SCOTUS if lower court rulings are any indication. Which means we want states like Utah and Kentucky to appeal the lower court rulings -- the sooner a case where the appellants have standing gets to SCOTUS, the sooner we'll see all marriages recognized in every state.

    There's only one rule that I know of, babies -- goddammit, you've got to be kind. -- Kurt Vonnegut

    by Cali Scribe on Thu Feb 13, 2014 at 12:33:47 PM PST

    •  This... (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Matt Z

      SCOTUS will be forced to deal with one of the other cases by that point.  It's also relatively clear how SCOTUS will rule at this point.  That was one of the wonderful things about Heyburn ruling yesterday: the Supreme Court and Kennedy will "have the final say" that "will likely complete this judicial journey." We all know at this point what that final say and completion will be.

  •  This is fucking unbelievable (9+ / 0-)

    and I ran against Marlin Stutzman for the Indiana house in 2006 lost 51-49 in a district that was 65% Republican
    If you told me this would happen in 2014 I would gladly have told you that you were out of your damned mind

  •  As a Hoosier. . . (16+ / 0-)

    I'm ashamed beyond words that our legislature was even considering enshrining such bigotry into our state constitution -- let alone taking steps to actually do it.

    Kudos to the business community -- and several of our state universities -- for choosing the right side in this battle.

    And for choosing to be on the right side of history.

    They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time, it works every time. -- Brian Fantana

    by IndyScott on Thu Feb 13, 2014 at 12:36:32 PM PST

    •  You're right to give credit (8+ / 0-)

      to Indiana's buiness community.

      It's rare that the Better Business Bureau opposes actions by a Republican legislature in a very red state, but HJR3 was rightfully seen as gross overkill on the part of Marriage Equality opponents.

       Eli Lily and Cummins lobbied hard against this bill, using both the media and good old-fashioned head knocking on the House and Senate floors. As the States's two largest employers, their arguments that this constitutional amendment would hamper their ability to hire and retain quality employees were effective, especially as Indy has seen real growth in its technology sectors.

      Indiana University, along with several other colleges argued the same thing, as did a number of Mayors - including the Republican Mayor of Indianapolis.

      Opposition to this bill crossed party lines, expecially the second sentence in the amendment which would have banned all domestic partnerships, regardless of the sex of the partners.

      Congratulations to everyone who fought this fight! There is still more work to do, as the bill isn't totally dead yet, but today's vote is great news for the Marriage Equality  movement.

      Here's my take on it - the revolution will not be blogged, it has to be slogged. - Deoliver47

      by OIL GUY on Thu Feb 13, 2014 at 01:05:31 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  Well, I guess Indiana has solved ALL its problems (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Alexandra Lynch

      and is now paradise on earth, where everyone has all they need – and so the legislature has time on its hands to make mischief.

      Oh — not so? Gee, just like Ohio then except here it's more restrictions on abortion and fewer on guns and zero focus on things like education, jobs, and human services.

      Ed FitzGerald for governor Of Ohio. Women's lives depend on it. http://www.edfitzgeraldforohio.com/

      by anastasia p on Thu Feb 13, 2014 at 01:21:23 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  I live in Indiana and I agree with you. (4+ / 0-)
  •  Wait, so if I understand this correctly (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    howabout

    The House stripped out the language, knowing it would need to be passed again in the next session to ensure it can come up for a vote?

    Very weird.

    •  there was always a possibility (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      annan

      that the Senate would restore the language.  But there was huge outcry against including the second sentence (by business interests, colleges and universities.)  They all knew what side their bread was buttered on.

      Amazing victory.

  •  Best husband/husband couple ever! n/t (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    howabout, Ahianne, DaddyO

    United Citizens beat Citizens United

    by ThirtyFiveUp on Thu Feb 13, 2014 at 12:50:34 PM PST

  •  In a related matter ... (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    bythesea, revsue, Ahianne, HeyMikey

    My own state of Alabama did adopt anti-equality laws. But I read this morning that a Montgomery man, with the help of the Southern Poverty Law Center, has filed a federal lawsuit challenging the Alabama Marriage Protection Act and Sanctity of Marriage Amendment

    Paul Hard is the sole plaintiff because his husband, Charles David Fancher, was killed in an auto accident about a year after they married in Massachusetts. Hospital employees and a funeral home director subjected Paul to the usual despicable behavior these laws are purpose-built to engender. In addition, Paul has no standing in a wrongful death suit that the administrator of Charles' estate has filed.

    I actually got a laugh out of the response from Mike Hubbard, (R-Auburn), Speaker of the Alabama House. "The SPLC is nothing more than the ACLU with a Southern accent."

    I'd call that a compliment. And I do hope they win.

    Just because you're not a drummer doesn't mean that you don't have to keep time. -- T. Monk

    by susanala on Thu Feb 13, 2014 at 01:15:33 PM PST

  •  Is it just me (0+ / 0-)

    Am I alone in seeing many republicans especially at the state level not being as rabid about gay marriage?  

    I do not see this issue as being something many of the state and local candidates to go to the mat for.   Sure, I know there are still reps and senators and commissioners and councilmen living in the '50's, but not so much anymore I think.

  •  So that -20 cold snap we had (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    annan, im2004lurker, indybend

    Was hell freezing over?
    This utterly surprises the hell out of me. I thought the Rs were going to ram this through, come hell or high water. I'm completely stunned.

    But, yeah, the fight's not over.

  •  Wait... (0+ / 0-)

    Now that I've re-read the article, it becomes pretty clear that this news is entirely the result of a blunder on the part of legislators, by passing language that was different from the 2011 language. The Senate passed the House bill.

    So, I guess I'm not entirely surprised now. The bigots, did, in fact, vote to enshrine hate into our constitution. They just made a procedural mistake with the language of the bill.

    So, yeah, we can't give up the fight. They'll just come back in the next legislature and vote again. You can bet they won't make the same mistake again.

    •  Not a procedural mistake if I understand this (3+ / 0-)

      correctly. Instead it was a cowardly way to ditch an unpopular initiative. Many R's are smart enough to see the tide turning and didn't want it on the ballot in 2014.

      "Let us not look back to the past with anger, nor towards the future with fear, but look around with awareness." James Thurber

      by annan on Thu Feb 13, 2014 at 02:57:56 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  they were in a bind (0+ / 0-)

      Without the second sentence, the right wing supporters were not happy with it, and it would delay the vote.   With the second sentence, there was no way it would approved by a majority of voters statewide, given the strong opposition of business and educational interests.

      Right wing overreach doomed it.  

  •  If more Americans (0+ / 0-)

    Specifically republicans were to have an open mind, and experiment with homosexual relationships, I bet more than 50% would change their minds about allowing same sex marriages.  Being a life long liberal, I was opposed to same sex marriage back in my college days, until that one night, I am proud to say I now fully support same sex relationships and marriage.  You need to open your mind and walk a mile in their shoes, it is about love have respect for all.  

  •  Of all the photos of all the gay couples... (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    jayden

    ...this one is my favorite. Hands down. It almost makes me cry.

    Because they're so...ORDINARY. Regular middle-aged men. One is outgoing with a big, toothy grin; the silver-haired one seems shy. They're not hot model-looking beauties caught in a deep kiss at the courthouse door; they're not slim male neatniks. They're regular guys who are gay and want to get married.

    Thank you for re-printing this photo, mcjoan. It touches me every time I see it.

    "I feel a lot safer already."--Emil Sitka

    by DaddyO on Thu Feb 13, 2014 at 08:03:55 PM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site