Skip to main content

Cartoon fish wrapped in newspaper.
The "Medicare cuts" lie, a major feature in the Republicans 2010 and 2012 game plan, is back. This time it's being backed up and funded by the insurance companies, who have no problem lying to and scaring their older customers if they think it's going to help the bottom line. Journalists should be doing their jobs and exposing those scare tactics for seniors, argues Trudy Lieberman at the Columbia Journalism Review.
About a year ago, insurance companies mobilized their sham grassroots group, the Coalition for Medicare Choices, to send letters to Congress and the Administration and pump big bucks in to studies, national advertising, and press releases noting that payment cuts would cause typical seniors with Medicare Advantage plans to see monthly premiums rise as much as $90—a claim the press did not investigate. In fact, press coverage was virtually nonexistent, and in the end the industry did not get a payment cut but a 3.3 percent raise from the government, which Politico called “one of the greatest political victories in recent memories.”

This year, the Coalition for Medicare Choices again is hard at work using the same strategy and a national grassroots and advocacy campaign called “Seniors are Watching.” The industry’s trade group, America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP), cites a new analysis by the firm Oliver Wyman (which prepared last year’s analysis) saying that those enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans could face premium increases and benefit reductions of $35 to $75 a month—a claim that also needs to be examined. To help reach their goal of maintaining current payment levels for next year, AHIP has enlisted support from other groups such as the National Hispanic Medical Association and the Healthcare Leadership Council, an organization of chief executives of all the big players in healthcare (hospitals, academic medical centers, drug companies, bio tech firms) that have an interest in making sure Medicare beneficiaries have large benefits to pay for the products and services they sell.[...]

[It] is a good story—a political one that offers a chance again to explain the difference between cuts and savings, and examine the cross-subsidies in the Affordable Care Act. But there’s more. It’s also a story about the bottom lines of insurance companies who want to make sure Medicare Advantage plans are super attractive to seniors—meaning, low premiums and lots of benefits which extra government payments have historically paid for. Last year, John Wasik, writing for the now-defunct Medicare News group, noted that while the insurance industry prefers to focus on what “cuts” might cost seniors, the industry’s own financial interests would run something like $11 billion in 2014. This year the numbers may be different, but the back story is the same. Reporters need to put the talking points in context and honestly explain to seniors what’s at stake for them.

Some seniors do have a stake in this, if their Medicare Advantage insurer shrinks physician networks in response to the cuts. But no senior is going to see a real cut in benefits, and what they will see is a more sustainable Medicare program, shored up by at least an additional decade by these savings. And who has a really big stake in this is the insurance companies. That's the story that doesn't get told enough. That and the fact that Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) has used the exact same Medicare savings in his budgets since 2011, and that almost every single Republican in the House has voted for those three budgets, with those Medicare cuts, every time.

The primary story, though, mostly likely will be what Republicans say: "Medicare cuts." That will be reinforced for seniors with astroturfed messages from the Coalition for Medicare Choices, telling them that these Obamacare cuts are going to harm them. The lie is a lot easier to tell than to debunk, but it's the traditional media's job to try.

Originally posted to Joan McCarter on Tue Feb 18, 2014 at 09:49 AM PST.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (25+ / 0-)

    "The NSA’s capability at any time could be turned around on the American people, and no American would have any privacy left, such is the capability to monitor everything. [...] There would be no place to hide."--Frank Church

    by Joan McCarter on Tue Feb 18, 2014 at 09:49:20 AM PST

  •  Not likely (0+ / 0-)

    So I was listening to Tell Me More, which generally is a good discussion on various issues, but this time they were giving the voice only to Obamacare haters.  The discussion involved possible lack of funding for the federal government.  The guy from georgia was talking about how much the republicans cared, and how they were going to go to bridges and find the homeless and give them comprehensive services because Obamacare was not just holistic enough, it was only medical, and still required co-pays. The reporter from Texas even talked about people losing their good health insurance.  I don't know what up with Martin tonight, but she sounding like she had been paid off and given a script.

    The misdirection is still out there, and it is not going away.

  •  The media doing its job (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ferg, Lencialoo

    I have a better chance of winning the lottery than I have of ever seeing the news media doing it job and reporting the facts instead of the spin!

    Dogs and Philosophers do the greatest good and get the fewest rewards (Diogenes)

    by Out There on Wed Feb 19, 2014 at 07:43:55 PM PST

  •  Tell me about the "death panels" (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Lencialoo, Miggles

    I want every journalist to ask the republicans about the horrible Obama death panels meme that they used to scare senior citizens.  I want them to ask mitt Romney about those same death panels that he mentioned during the second presidential debate.

    what a complete load of crock!

  •  Question: Are the funds still leaving Medicare? (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Whether they are no longer funding a wasteful program (Medicare Advantage) or not.  Are the funds people are paying into Medicare being diverted to other non-Medicare programs?

    It's a simple question that I have not been able to find the answer to.

    If they are Medicare funds, they should remain in Medicare to reduce the costs to Medicare recipients, not to be used for other programs.  

    Can someone answer this simple question?

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site