Skip to main content

The argument behind Arizona's latest cutting to the front of the crazy line is that the proposed Gays Have Cooties, Are Icky And Aren't Welcome Here legislation will pass constitutional muster, because everyone gets a chance to think anyone else is icky and gross and must go. And that's actually its biggest danger to everyone in the room.

 Making this about anti-gay discrimination actually hides most divisive, destructive effects of a bill that basically gives out universal discrimination rights, on any topic, against any segment of persons (or just someone you don't like that day), because freedom.

 Let's work through a few contrasts. Some might seem laughable out of scope...except people talk about doing some of these very things - and loudly - from time to time.

 You might just happen to think that a company firing all its registered Democrats is really cool... until the water to Republican-dominated neighborhoods is shut off.

 You might think kicking gays out of restaurants is awesome until Catholics are no longer allowed in public schools in a given school system.

 Maybe ERs no longer accepting indigent patients is full of win from where you are sitting...until a cop decides that interfering with a man's dominance over his wife and kids is against his understanding of the Epistles of Paul, at which point it's the morgue not the emergency room that's receiving visitors that night.

 Now let's get to the really fun parts of this law: corporations are people too, with religious values, under this proposed legislation.

 What happens when the corporation decides that paying taxes is sharia law and no darn way we're gettin' our Islam on? Or feels deeply bound by faith that honoring safety regulations while the wrong party controls the White House is a fast track to hellfire? Or that not paying people - or not whipping them if their production is low - is how God would want it done?

 Yeah, this is a rather open-ended cluster, people. This is that instance where something somebody imagined was a good idea, because Gay People Have Cooties, is a ticket for social, economic and political chaos.

 Seriously, all of the above NOT happening is placing a big bet that people in general aren't reactive, take abuse sitting down and never retaliate.

 By the way, keep in mind we are talking about Americans here. We are not a passive, nonviolent society. We are proud, quick to befriend and just as quick to anger.

 And just imagine what you will feel like the first time someone you happen to care about is turned away from a store, or out of their apartment, or from their job, because of someone else's religious freedom to think they were icky.

 If it were only one state experimenting with this, it might be safe for the rest of the Republic to sit back and watch the cautionary tale play out.

 But it's never a good idea for government to willfully step aside and let harm be done to their citizens. And that's exactly what this bill proposes to do: Make harming others cool, and then surrendering all responsibility to do a damn thing about it.

 And that's not cool.

UPDATE: Never mind my rant. Go check out Americablog's Opus Magnus on this very thing.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site