Skip to main content

There have been several notable examples of bad behavior by the uber-wealthy in the news lately.

Comparing the treatment of the rich to Kristallnacht, for example.

Blaming reduction in company benefits on two specific employees with “distressed babies” for another. Yeah, that was Tim Armstrong, All-American Boy! From AOL! Hooray?

They are many other examples.

Many explanations have been offered for this disconnect of certain members of the “one percent” to the public at large, such as living in a media or corporate bubble, where one is exposed to a very limited set of opinions. There is also the seemingly unlimited human propensity to believe in that which is most convenient and benefits oneself. There are many other reasons offered.

I would like to offer here a parable, albeit a very old one, that I think may be illustrative of another thesis that I would like to offer, below the fold...  

A little over twenty years ago, I was working for a large corporation headquartered, at that time, in Pittsburgh. The corporation had just hired a new CEO who decided to visit some of the field offices as one of his first actions.  So far so good.

At that time, the internet was not widespread as today, but our company had its own long-distance telephone system (satellite to most corporate offices around the U.S. and elsewhere), as well as an in-house email system.  The employees, for that time, were very, very connected. So that makes the following anecdote even more incomprehensible to me.  

After his visit to a site in North Carolina, the CEO was driven to an airport by an employee from that location, along with a few higher ranking managers. The driver was a long-term employee and a manager, well-known and well-liked throughout the company. He was chosen to drive because he had just purchased a brand new vehicle, which was large enough to accommodate the entourage. He, of course, was very nervous about meeting the new CEO, and he accidently locked his keys in his new, still-unfamiliar vehicle after arrival at the airport. To say he was panicked and embarassed is an understatement. An airport mechanic (if I recollect correctly) arrived with tools to try to help, while others discussed calling for the spare set of keys and waiting for their arrival.  

The CEO immediately grabbed a tool, however, and shattered a window. “Problem solved,” he stated. By the way, he was in no danger of missing his flight.  It was a corporate jet. At a small airport.

This story spread like wildfire throughout the entire employee base.  For most, it was their first knowledge of the new CEO beyond his resume. He was immediately reviled. In fact, that feeling never diminished at all. He was pretty much hated by everyone that I had dealings with in the company, which were many.

So what did the CEO do that was so wrong? Well...

He treated this man as if he were nothing. A thing.

He assumed he had the right to do what he did. If an ordinary person smashed the window of a stranger's car, he could expect to be bitched out, at the least.  Maybe arrested.  Probably sued. But at the very minimum told, “Gee, that was not nice”.  But that was not possible. He had the power to fire anyone who said that.

He humiliated his employee. Yes, the guy he treated like dirt did not tell anyone. Why would he? He probably just wanted to crawl into a hole and die. No, the others there spread the word. And they told the story pretty accurately, and it spread. The guy with the smashed window would not talk about it.

I can attest, no one that I knew had quite the company loyalty that they did before. Employee turnover increased. And morale? What morale? Sheesh.

Yet I am sure that this bastard thought that he was a great guy, a problem solver, a “saver” or “creator” of jobs. We all saw him for the prick that he was (proven by later actions). His wife may have even loved him (although I cannot imagine how somebody who approaches things like this guy did would make love, I mean, holy crap!).

The sense of entitlement is obscene. “I earned this” or “I deserve this” or “I worked harder to get what I have that you did” or “I am smarter and/or better that you”, has anyone heard this before? It all boils down to this:  “You are less than me”.

We really have to address this sense of self-entitlement. The woman serving your meal at your favorite restaurant may be smarter than you. Or your meter reader. Or your mail carrier. Or (hold on to your hats here) your children's teacher (yeah, the ones with at least one degree, probably more, that put up with more bullshit than a CEO can even imagine... ). Any or all of them may have worked harder than you. They certainly have to put up with a lot more abuse, don't they? They are all people. Real people. Perhaps we should declare that all people are corporations, then maybe they will have more rights.

It is this disgusting, vile sense of entitlement that is the root cause. These people are simply self-entitled bastards and we have to call them out. Often. Every time. Publicly. If we would have had the reach of the internet then that we do today, I am certain that this incident would have been publicized widely, and deservedly so.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site