Skip to main content

The secret John Doe II Probe, which arose out of the original John Doe, is very, very slowly revealing a few of it's secrets.  

Steven Biskupic, an attorney who has represented Gov. Scott Walker’s campaign, was named in a court order Thursday as an attorney in a case challenging the ongoing secret investigation into possible illegal campaigning during the recalls against Walker and others in 2011 and 2012.

The order, issued Thursday by 4th District Court of Appeals Judge Brian Blanchard, also revealed that the number of unnamed parties challenging the secret probe has grown from three to eight.

The order, largely procedural, reveals that John Doe prosecutor Francis Schmitz is asking the appeals court to take unspecified action involving a decision by Judge Gregory Peterson, who is overseeing the five-county probe, including Dane County.

(bolding is mine)

While the John Doe probes are secret (like a Grand Jury), the secret court filings attempting to kill the investigation are maddening.  There are 4 cases thus far, including one filed secretly directly with the State Supreme Court (bypassing all lower courts).  And we know little about them because, well, they're filed and kept secret.

We know now, however, that Scott Walkers lawyer is one of those trying to kill the probe.  And that just might explain this:

In its last campaign-finance statement, Friends of Scott Walker reported paying Biskupic’s firm $86,000 in legal fees. Asked earlier this month whether the payments were related to the John Doe probe, the governor responded, “I’m not getting into the details of it.”
Whether Biskopic was one of the original lawyers or a new arrival joining the others is unknown.  

Who is This Guy?

Steven Biskupic was US Attorney in southeastern Wisconsin appointed by George W. Bush and one of many who refused to submit his resignation when Bush left office.  

He is best known having jumped jurisdictional boundaries to file a bogus case against Georgia Thompson, a state employee charged bid rigging.  This bogus case was used in a series of attack ads against former Governor Jim Doyle (D) during his run for re-election.  Biskupic achieved a conviction in his flimsy case, refused to allow her to remain free during her appeal (as Kelly Rindfleisch was allowed), and the woman sat in prison until the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals demanded her immediate release and reversed her conviction.

Despite the fact that the case was obviously politically motivated, the Department of Justice cleared Biskopic of ethical violations.  

After he finally released his grip on his US Attorney post, he joined the law firm of Michael Best and Friedrich before leaving to start his own firm.

This is the guy Walker has working for him.  

And then there's Michael Best and Friedrich.  If you've read my diaries, you know they're the "go to" Republican law firm.  Scott Walker hired them to do state business and they got to work.

The governor turned to Michael Best & Friedrich not only when his landmark collective bargaining bill ended up in court, but also for advice on drafting mining legislation, to fight aspects of his recall election and to represent him in the ongoing John Doe investigation.

Meanwhile, Republican senators turned to the firm for help with recall elections this past summer, and leaders of the state Senate and Assembly hired the firm to help draft the state's 10-year redistricting plan — and defend it in court.

Yup, remember that secret redistricting that was done off site to avoid pesky Open Records Laws.  The redistricting that only included Republicans who signed loyalty oaths, that kept out the public or public interest groups?  The plan to redistrict that wouldn't allow anyone to see it before it was rammed through the State Legislature.  

Yup, those were the guys.

Sweet deal for them, too:

The relationship with the GOP has netted the firm well more than $750,000 in legal fees since Republicans took control of the state last January, a tally that includes fees for work on redistricting, mining legislation and parts of work on Walker's recall campaign and John Doe investigation. Those are the contracts that have been made public. Several others have not.

According to Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald, R-Juneau, Michael Best & Friedrich is worth every penny.

(bolding is mine)

They no longer represent Walker or Republicans in government because their reputation got pretty dinged up:

The firm on Jan. 3 received a stern condemnation from the U.S. District Court in Milwaukee over its handling of parts of the redistricting lawsuit. The judges accused the Republican leaders, and the firm itself, of "stonewalling," and "dragging their feet" in the case and were ordered to pay $17,500 in attorney fees.

It was the second time Michael Best & Friedrich made unflattering headlines in less than a month. In December news broke that Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman, a well-known conservative, had received about $100,000 worth of free legal services from a Michael Best & Friedrich attorney.

And all those free legal services sure paid off for them, too.  He voted for their side in every legal action Michael Best was involved in until that got noticed by the press.

So, now that Michael Best is on the outs, it was a good time for Biskupic to move on out and hang out his own shingle.  There's a lot of legal work that needs to be done for Republicans these days.

Don't ask Scott Walker about the John Doe or secret email system.  He a) doesn't know a thing, b) says it's "old news", or c) says the case was closed.

Maybe he needs to change the title of his book.  Instead of "Unintimidated" it should be titled "Unindicted".  Might make a great campaign slogan.

Something stinks here in Wisconsin and it's not the cheese.


Originally posted to Puddytat on Sun Mar 02, 2014 at 01:28 PM PST.

Also republished by Badger State Progressive.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site