Skip to main content

With apologies to Harold Ramis (RIP), why does this feel like Groundhog Day? Sadly, this is not a movie... this is real life... or real death, as it were.

Once again, a child is dead, a family is wondering how this could have happened to a "responsible gun owner" and no doubt the usual suspects will point to anything and everything but the (literally) smoking gun... follow me beneath the fold for yet another story you've seen all too often, albeit a particularly egregious version of it.

Dateline: Lake Worth, FL.

The headline:

Gun that killed 3-year-old was left loaded on table, deputies say
No doubt the headline will result in the familiar grind of teeth-gnashing from 2nd amendment advocates over the "implication" that the "gun" killed the 3-year-old girl when clearly the gun did not pull its own trigger, right? Clearly she killed herself, right?
Hello? Is this thing on?
The gun used in an accidental, self-inflicted shooting that killed a 3-year-old girl last month had been left loaded on a table while the child's father got ready for work, deputies say.
Surely there must have been a "reasonable" explanation for a "responsible" gun owner to leave a loaded gun on a table (while otherwise occupied) with children in the house, right?
Chambers, who had a valid concealed weapons permit, told investigators he left the gun out because he didn't want to forget it when he left for work.
(Emphasis mine)

Well there you go! Who can blame him for not wanting to forget his gun before going to work? Something tells me the last thing this guy would "forget" would be his gun... he apparently "forgot" that his little girl had been caught handling the gun before:

Chambers told deputies Zuri had picked up the gun once before, a few months earlier, when it was sitting in a laundry basket.
Completely understandable that one other incident might have slipped his mind, right?
Zuri's mother recalled another incident. That time, she was sleeping and woke up to Zuri pointing a gun at her. She said she yelled at her daughter and quickly took the gun away. Chambers knew about that encounter because he was laying in bed next to her, she said, according to the report.
Well, at least he learned his lesson (albeit a painful lesson), right?
When a deputy walked through the Chambers' house on Feb. 13, he saw a fully loaded Beretta 9 mm semi-automatic pistol in plain view on top of an acoustic amplifier adjacent to a play pen in Chambers' room.
(Again, emphasis mine)
Last month, a family member described Chambers as a responsible gun owner and said he is the "most wonderful father in the world.
And this "responsible" gun owner, the "most wonderful father in the world" apparently felt his daughter was sufficiently protected from his negligence because:
Chambers said he never imagined his daughter was strong enough to pull the trigger on the Kel-Tec 9 mm semi-automatic pistol, which requires 10 pounds of pressure, the report said.
Seems reasonable, right?

So now we have this:

Chambers is charged with aggravated manslaughter of a child.
Does anyone familiar with Florida's "liberal" gun laws know whether or not this "responsible" gun owner/"most wonderful father in the world" is still legally in possession of his firearms? Can anyone truthfully say he should be?

I'm curious as to what the "responsible" gun owners in this community have to say about this incident, although sadly, I'm pretty sure I already know...

Cue the crickets...

Rest in peace, little girl...

1:18 PM PT: UPDATE: Forgot to link the article:

Originally posted to ThatSinger on Mon Mar 03, 2014 at 09:55 AM PST.

Also republished by Firearms Law and Policy, Repeal or Amend the Second Amendment (RASA), and Shut Down the NRA.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site