Skip to main content

If the Business Council of Alabama, big insurance conglomerates like State Farm and Allstate, and big business advocacy group the U.S. Chamber of Commerce (and its Tort Reform affiliate the Institute for Legal Reform) get their way in Alabama, the business of consumer legal funding (lawsuit landing as this coalition likes to call it) will disappear from Alabama.  In fact, recent legislation introduced in the Alabama General Assembly targeting lawsuit lending in truth does just that.  Passed as is, the lawsuit lending legislation (SB 231) would shut down the consumer legal funding industry for good in Alabama, which is the intent of these sponsors.

Lawsuit lending has given Alabama consumers an option to a product that acts as a counterweight to big insurance company delay tactics and low-ball settlement offers for injury claims.  Alabama citizens now have an option when pressured to accept a low settlement offer from the intimidating well-heeled insurance companies. The insurance company motto has been that you can have a fair settlement or a prompt settlement, but not both.  Currently, Alabama consumers can use legal funding to cover immediate personal expenses and wait out the process of obtaining a fair settlement on their injury claim.  

The Business Council of Alabama is the US Chamber of Commerce’s surrogate organization in Alabama.  The Business Council of Alabama was a bit more forthright as to its position on Legal Funding in its newsletter, the BCA Blog.  In its December 9, 2013 Blog, in fact, it stated that “BCA will support efforts to prohibit third-party litigation financing”.  

Why the interest by the Business Council of Alabama and the US Chamber of Commerce to prohibit the product?  Well, their key constituents, the big insurance companies in Alabama and all across the United States, have perfected the science of offering less-then-market rate settlements ("rapid settlements", as Allstate likes to call it internally) with consumers for automobile injury claims.  Insurance companies, such as State Farm and Allstate, have developed systematic methods to delay claims long enough to make injured consumers eager to take a low settlement offer.  Just ask Kim Zilisch her story (or read about it at   These long-standing big insurance company tactics take advantage of injured Alabama citizens who are unable to work and are without a paycheck.  

With consumer legal funding, Alabama consumers who have a pending injury claim can obtain non-recourse funding to help pay for everyday living expenses such as rent, utilities, transportation and food.  These small amounts of funding help alleviate the worries of Alabama consumers' daily financial lives and allows them to pursue a fair settlement for their injury claims with powerful big insurance companies.  And because of the way legal funding is structured, they do not have to pay the legal funding company back if there is no recovery.

Insurance companies, along with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, whose chairman is conveniently the CEO of State Farm Insurance, are hiring the likes of high-priced lobbyist Thurbert Baker (former Georgia Attorney General) and spending millions of dollars to tell a tall tale to Alabama consumers, the Alabama General Assembly and anyone else who will listen that consumer legal funding is a product that Alabama consumers should not have the choice to have.

Hopefully Alabama General Assembly members will stand up for the freedom of choice that Alabama consumers deserve after faithfully paying their insurance premiums for years.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  If you lose your lawsuit, do you still owe (0+ / 0-)

    any money to the lender? If so it sounds like just another vehicle to keep poor people indebted.

    What exactly is your angle anyways? Are you in this industry?

    •  Excellent question. (0+ / 0-)

      No a consumer does not owe anything if they do not recover.  The legal funding company purchases a portion of the claim. if the claim goes to zero, then there is no repayment. The product creates no indebtedness, and the product is used at times to pay off credit card debt, payday debt etc.  And yes, as I disclose in my profile, I am in the legal funding industry.  And feel strongly about not denying poor people access to capital just because insurance companies feel the product will increase the costs of their claim payments.

  •  Good for the BCA. (0+ / 0-)

    If I had my way, Champerty and Maintenance would be felonies once more.

    All allowing for "entrepreneurial lawyering" does is bankrupt society at the expense of lawyers.  The particular litigation investment in question is an effort to beat large settlements out of the insurers, the cost of which would be passed on to all the insured, while the trial bar makes out like bandits.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site