Skip to main content

Crossposted at Of Means and Ends.

Americans like to think of our country as a land of opportunity where every man, woman and child has a shot at success. With hard work and dedication, anyone can make it.

The growing income gap belies the idealistic rhetoric. There are many straightforward ways in which low-income people struggle--if you aren't making enough money, feeding and housing your family can be difficult to impossible. But beyond meeting these basic needs, there are also fundamental rights we as Americans like to think are income blind. The reality is quite different.

1. The right to privacy. The internet has made information readily accessible to a wide range of people, with free services like Google and relatively inexpensive access on cell phones. But that information comes at a price, as Julia Angwin points out in a New York Times piece. Angwin wrote a book about her extensive efforts to protect her privacy and worries that it may become a "luxury good." She spent $2,200 and "countless hours" trying to keep her data and her movements private. As she argues, it's not simply about keeping advertisers from accessing your data. It's used to give people different information and prices based on their data, and the government has used it in broad sweeps to identify criminal suspects.

2. The right to vote. This is one of our most fundamental rights and without it, we may be stripped of many others. The rights of low-income people are only going to be reflected in our government if they have the power to put people in office. On the surface level, it seems as though people at all income levels (with some notable exceptions) should be able to vote since the days of the direct poll tax are gone. But there are costs just the same, and efforts to crack down on nonexistent voting fraud are bringing about a de facto poll tax.

With a wave of new voter ID laws, proponents will argue that the required photo IDs can be obtained for free. But often voters must pay for documents needed to qualify for the ID. A study by the Brennan Center for Justice showed that a birth certificate could cost between $8 and $25, more than the $10.64 the poll tax would be in today's dollars. There are also transportation barriers and scheduling issues involved. The study found that one town in Wisconsin only offered IDs on the fifth Wednesday of every month. Even if all these obstacles are overcome, it can often be more challenging for low-income voters to get away from work to vote, despite laws requiring that flexibility.

3. The right to a fair trial. Technically, every American is entitled to legal representation regardless of income. But if you really want the best criminal defense, it's going to cost you. While public defenders may have the best of intentions, the system makes it nearly impossible for them to inadequately represent indigent clients.

The low pay for public defenders makes it difficult for law graduates saddled with student loans to take on the job. Greg Apt, who worked as a public defender in Los Angeles County, describes taking a night job delivering pizzas to pay off his loans.

The lack of funding means a huge case load for public defenders. A 2009 report showed that public defenders can carry as many as 500 felony cases and 2,225 misdemeanors. Public defenders also don't have the resources to pay for expert testimony and do thorough investigations. These factors combined mean poor clients don't get the most effective representation possible, which can have huge ripple effects throughout their lives. The system also incentivizes plea bargaining, shoving people into a criminal justice system that can throw up subsequent obstacles to everything from employment to voting.

4. Reproductive rights. Women's reproductive freedom has been under attack in this country, making it harder for women to access proper medical care. This is doubly true for poor women. The clearest obstacle for low-income women is the Hyde amendment, a restriction on using Medicaid funds to pay for abortions that is regularly renewed by Congress. This impractical, ideologically-driven prohibition leads to desperate situations, like the woman in Jessica Arons' Talking Points Memo piece who said, “I’m thinking of ways I can fall or what I can do to end this pregnancy [myself].”

Other restrictions on abortion access also disproportionately affect poor women. Restrictive laws and violent attacks have reduced the number of abortion clinics, meaning women sometimes need to take long and expensive journeys to get the procedure. Mississippi has only one abortion clinicleft in the entire state. Regulations that require waiting periods can mean that women who want abortions have to travel far and stay for multiple days, and many can't afford to take that much time off of work or provide care to their other children.

Women who can't afford child care can be driven even further into poverty by an unintended pregnancy. As Arons writes, "Indeed, a recent study revealed that a woman who seeks an abortion and is turned away is three times as likely to fall into poverty as a woman who obtains an abortion, rendering both Roe and the War on Poverty empty rhetoric for them."

Our rights should never be for sale to the highest bidder. If we want to make rhetoric about equality ring true, we can't can't cling to an ideal and be willfully blind to the ways inequality is shaping our society.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  "While public defenders may have the best of (0+ / 0-)

    intentions, the system makes it nearly impossible for them to inadequately represent indigent clients"

    I have to take issue with this.  PDs undoubtedly work in very tough environments under impossible constraints, but many of them are very good at what they do and extremely effective in court.  I knew people in law school with impeccable credentials who went on to be PDs.  The PDs I know and work with are often substantially more skilled and prepared then your average private criminal defense attorney.  That's not to say that our indigent defense system doesn't need help (it does), but I think you're shortchanging the PDS.  

    •  It's not meant to be a criticism of public (0+ / 0-)

      defenders. If you read the article I link to, it's clear that many of them feel overwhelmed and that they can't give all their clients adequate attention. Without the resources to spend on expert testimony, etc., and trying to balance thousand of clients, even the best lawyers aren't going to be able to represent everyone to their best ability. It's not to say they're not talented, but that the system makes it impossible for them to do their jobs as well as they should in these high stakes situations.

  •  I know the best solution! (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    "If you're poor, stop being poor!" - Todd Wilemon

  •  4th Amendment Rights (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Of Means and Ends

    Ask the homeless if they are "secure in their persons, houses, PAPERS, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures".

    Due to the "National Security State". People without possession of a "Valid" (expired are refused on principle) photo ID and, lacking that; 3 forms of ID such as state embossed birth certificate, Social Security Card, Passport, Military ID.

    The catch is when someone is released from jail, without ID, they are a 'non-person' - unable to rent a room, get a job, apply for food stamps. The only thing the undocumented (native born as well as immigrant) can do to survive is return to the underground economy.

    Of course the State can figure out real fast who you are if you commit a crime: the corporations and legislatures have righteously determined a way to profit from the misfortune of the miscreants and underclass.  

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site