Skip to main content

If:

1] You are extraordinarily rich

2]You Head a major corporation [then you tend to have 2 votes rich and powerful] Exxon Rosneft being a prime example of why sanctions will be oh so limited and Crimea will be forgotten by the week-end.

3] You are on the right and have a radio show.

The only way in general most of us can get power:

1] Forming a trade union.

2] Demonstrating and you probably need to be in 1 as well.

Now we have seen trade unions bashed and demonstrations pepper sprayed.

So what do you have left.

A vote every once in a while, your choice especially in the US is one or other of the two parties since that is where the money resides and nowhere else any other choice is ridiculed and marginalized.

Well at least when you tally up the votes someone wins and gosh if your side won you should feel good. So after all this feel good what do we have?

Unimaginable income inequality

Stagnant wages.

Indebtedness from the day we take out loans to pay for education, a home if we can qualify by saving just enough of our diminishing wages.

If we are really unlucky we end up homeless.

Yes, but everyone can haz the American dream, nope sorry that only concerns the very very few.

So the majority end up deeply in debt but well off enough to fear that any rocking of the boat and we end up destitute.

The fear keeps the status quo going, and even generates union bashing by people who actually would benefit from being in a union.

But, but I haz vote!

Yes and you will be promised milk and cookies by all and sundry for your vote and menaced with the apocalypse if you don't vote.

So what is the choice.

The Democratic Party that merely slows down the giving away of the nations riches to the oh so very few.

The Republican party that just wants to give it all away yesterday.

Forget any made up wedge issue, this is money driven politics.

I ask the question what reversals in this tendency have we seen recently?

Hmmm?

The only conclusion I can come up with because in the grand scheme of things is that just by merely voting is nowhere near enough.

Demonstrations [the tea party did prove one thing and that is you can scare the bejesus out of your own Party]

Unionization either by trade unions or special interests.

The final straw is the removal of our votes.

Hell if we can scare our own side enough maybe just maybe they might listen.

We might even get a livable minimum wage and heaven forbid campaign finance reform

Then again if we just keep going merrily along and vote for one of the main two parties no matter what they do we have already diminished even our last vestigial power, our vote.

I suggest reading this if you do not believe me when I talk about income inequality and power

In the three decades prior to the recent economic downturn, wage gaps widened and household income inequality increased in a large majority of OECD countries. This occurred even when countries were going through a period of sustained economic and employment growth. This report analyses the major underlying forces behind these developments:

- An Overview of Growing Income Inequalities in OECD Countries An Overview of Growing Income Inequalities in OECD Countries: Main Findings

- Special Focus: Inequality in Emerging Economies Special Focus: Inequality in Emerging Economies (EEs)

- Part I. How Globalisation, Technological Change and Policies Affect Wage and Earnings Inequalities

- Part II. How Inequalities in Labour Earnings Lead to Inequalities in Household Disposable Income

- Part III. How the Roles of Tax and Transfer Systems Have Changed

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site