Skip to main content

Daily Kos Elections Morning Digest banner
Want the scoop on hot races around the country? Get the digest emailed to you each weekday morning. Sign up here.
Leading Off:

SC-Gov: The RGA is running a second ad in South Carolina attacking Democratic gubernatorial hopeful Vincent Sheheen, and they're peddling yet another Obamacare horror story, albeit in a different vein from the typical Americans for Prosperity variety. Rather than someone who says they've lost insurance coverage, this spot features a business owner who claims that "Obamacare has cost jobs in my company" because of an alleged "increase" in premiums, and then uses that to bash Sheheen.

There are a couple of problems here, though. First off, insurance companies have always been free to jack up rates, so tying this one company's rate hike to Obamacare is tendentious at best. Second, a title card that says "34,000 South Carolina jobs could be lost" due to Obamacare actually cites to a totally bogus blog post from Grover Norquist's Americans for Tax Reform. The ATR's claims are based on a long-discredited willful misreading of a report last month from the Congressional Budget Office that rather pointedly did not say that the Affordable Care Act would cause 2.5 million people nationwide to lose their jobs; rather, the law may allow some Americans to work less.

Of course, the RGA can probably peddle this b.s. for as long as they like. It'll be up to Sheheen and his allies to call them on it.


CO-Sen: PPP's new Colorado poll confirms exactly what we imagined when up-and-coming GOP Rep. Cory Gardner made a late and unexpected entry into his state's Senate race: The numbers look pretty good for him. Democratic Sen. Mark Udall sports a narrow 42-40 lead over Gardner, who starts off already known to half of all voters with a 23-25 favorability rating, despite representing just a seventh of the state for barely three years. (Udall's job approval is a middling 41-40.) A year ago, when PPP tested a hypothetical Udall-Gardner matchup, the incumbent led 49-39. Things, evidently, have changed.

But it's important to point out that even before Gardner's appearance, Udall was facing a re-election campaign that had already grown more difficult than initially anticipated. In PPP's December poll, Udall only sported a 46-42 lead on 2010 GOP nominee Ken Buck, who has since dropped down to run for Gardner's seat. And in the new survey, Udall also doesn't do a whole lot better against the one remotely plausible non-Gardner candidate still in the race, state Sen. Randy Baumgardner, who trails 44-37 and is unknown to 70 percent of the state. (Udall led 47-40 last time.)

But what about state Sen. Owen Hill, who was so voluble about the backroom switcheroo arranged by Buck and Gardner that he branded as "corrupt"? Well, Hill's decided to be a team player after all: On Monday, he dropped out and endorsed Gardner, saying Republicans need a "united front."

It's possible, though, that his departure might aid Baumgardner if any kind of anti-Gardner movement coalesces. And actually, Baumgardner came closest to Gardner (albeit not close) in PPP's test of the GOP primary, trailing 44-15, with the now-departed Hill at 6 and a couple of Some Dudes in low single digits. Hill, though, had at least earned the backing of the outside group Tea Party Express; no one really seems to love Baumgardner, and Democrats have to operate with the expectation that Gardner will be the nominee.

As we always like to caution, this is just one poll—but it doesn't come in a vacuum. Not only is there Gardner's decision to consider, but the Koch brothers' Americans for Prosperity just inserted itself into the race for the first time, with a $1 million television ad buy targeting Udall.

Udall, though, is a strong campaigner and excellent fundraiser, and he still has an advantage here. But Republicans have succeeded in putting this race into play, and even if Udall prevails, a competitive contest in Colorado means that already-stretched resources will likely get spread even thinner. With control of the Senate up for grabs and so many blue seats vulnerable, this is not a positive development for Democrats.

KY-Sen: A non-profit called the Kentucky Opportunity Coalition is reportedly slated to begin a $1.8 million ad campaign on behalf of GOP Sen. Mitch McConnell this week, and as expected, the much-mocked wordless video footage of McConnell creepily smiling for the camera has indeed made its way into the group's first commercial. The spot touts McConnell's alleged support for the military while claiming that Obama wants to "cut" it, and every shot of McConnell is from that now-infamous B-roll.

MT-Sen: Republican Rep. Steve Daines is out with a very non-partisan ad that touts his record as a job creator. Daines says he ignored people who told him he was "crazy to start a high-tech firm in Montana instead of somewhere like California," but he forged ahead with a software company called RightNow Technologies that he says employs over four hundred people in his home state. According to his own Wikipedia page, though, Daines joined the company as a vice president three years after its founding.

OK-Sen-B: Oklahomans for a Conservative Future, an outside group that's supporting former state House Speaker T.W. Shannon in his bid for Senate, has released a new poll of the GOP primary from Public Opinion Strategies showing Rep. James Lankford with a 37-28 lead. If you're wondering why someone would tout a poll that has their guy down, it's because the margin is much smaller than the 47-17 spread a Lankford internal found last month. OCF is also probably trying to justify the $300,000 it's already spent on TV ads and mailers on Shannon's behalf.

SC-Sen-A: Wow. A gravelly-voiced announced actually deploys the hackneyed "In a world..." trope in GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham's latest ad, something I don't think I've ever seen in the political arena. Graham tries to appeal to the conservative id by saying he's "not going to stop criticizing the president for a foreign policy that's a failure," invoking Benghazi, Iran, and "radical Islam." The narrator then (without any irony, of course) continues: "In a dangerous world, where the only guarantee of peace is strength, Lindsey Graham stands strong." I just really wish he ended with "No, I like it in here!"

Graham says the ad is backed by a "six-figure statewide" buy.


CO-Gov: Fortunately for Colorado Democrats, PPP's poll actually offers some reasons to be upbeat, too: Gov. John Hickenlooper has expanded his leads against the entire GOP field, and he holds a healthy edge on newcomer Bob Beauprez, too. Here's how Hickenlooper fares (with December trendlines in parentheses):

48-38 vs. ex-Rep. Bob Beauprez

48-36 vs. Secretary of State Scott Gessler (47-40)

50-36 vs. ex-Rep. Tom Tancredo (48-40)

48-33 vs. state Sen. Greg Brophy (44-43)

49-33 vs. ex-state Sen. Mike Kopp (45-37)

Ah, the vagaries of polling. Three months ago, the little-known Brophy was just a point behind the incumbent; now he trails by 15. Still, it's interesting to see Hickenlooper's fortunes headed in a different direction from Sen. Mark Udall's, despite the fact that they share a party. Hick's approvals have rebounded to a positive 48-41, from 45-48 last time. It may just be that Udall, as a member of Congress, is bearing the brunt of Obama's unpopularity more directly than Hickenlooper, a state official.

And therein lies something positive for Udall: If the governor stays strong, GOP Rep. Cory Gardner would need quite a few crossover votes from Hickenlooper supporters in order to win the Senate race. In today's hyper-polarized world, that's no easy task.

Gardner could also find himself on a ticket with the very unappetizing Tancredo, who still has a small edge in the GOP primary. Beauprez's entry has shaken things up, though, and Tancredo only leads him 24-20, with Gessler at 18, Kopp at 8, Brophy at 7 and a couple of Some Dudes barely registering. In December, Tancredo had a stronger 34-15 over Gessler, so the Republican establishment has to be pleased with this development. Still, Tancredo could most certainly earn the nomination, which would be good news for Hickenlooper and bad news for Gardner.

FL-Gov: The University of North Florida has a strange new gubernatorial poll, with a ton of undecideds and some questionable framing. Democrat Charlie Crist leads GOP Gov. Rick Scott just 34-33, far closer than any other polling has found, but that's because UNF offered respondents the option of choosing "someone else," even though there simply isn't any kind of "someone else" who is remotely capable of earning 17 percent of the vote, as that choice garnered here. (The same percentage were undecided.)

At most, this shows that a sizable chunk of voters aren't thrilled with either candidate, but that's the case in a lot of elections. That's why it's much more informative to ask about the contest that voters will actually be confronted with, rather than some vague hypothetical that can't possibly come to fruition. What's particularly strange, though, is that UNF included "someone else" when they last polled in October, but that choice only netted 2 percent at the time (when Crist was up 44-40). It's possible voters have soured on both Crist and Scott as the campaign quickly became very negative since that time, but again, these are the only major candidates to choose from.

UPDATE: Actually, the question wording changed. It looks like UNF allowed respondents to volunteer "someone else" in October and recorded those responses, but in their new poll, "someone else" was actually given as an option when the ballot test was asked.

KS-Gov: Road Map Solutions, a conservative group supporting GOP Gov. Sam Brownback, will reportedly start airing ads on the incumbent's behalf, starting with an $82,000 buy. The spots aren't available yet but it sounds like they will be positive in nature. Brownback, a Republican running in a red state, theoretically shouldn't have to worry about re-election. But in reality, he's deeply unpopular and polls have shown him in difficult shape against his Democratic challenger, state House Minority Leader Paul Davis, which probably explains why Brownback's supporters are going on TV so early.

PA-Gov: Here's another ad from Democrat Katie McGinty, in which the narrator says she was "endorsed by Al Gore" and "praised by President Clinton"—which means "not endorsed by," right? McGinty goes on to tout her record in creating "clean energy jobs" when she served as the state's secretary for environmental protection. She concludes with a somewhat awkward line, insisting that Pennsylvania should be tops in "opportunity, whether you wear steel-toed boots or a white lab coat."

TX-Gov: The Emerson College Polling Society, which was the only public outfit to nail the margin in last year's gubernatorial race in Virginia, is back with their first poll in a while, on behalf of a group called the Texas Research Institute. Emerson finds Republican Greg Abbott leading Democrat Wendy Davis 49-42 in the race for governor, which is the closest margin anyone's found for Davis in a while. However, Abbott's just a point shy of 50 here, so these numbers are not especially optimistic for the Democrat.


CO-03: That was quick. Pueblo County Commissioner Buffie McFadyen, who only decided to run against GOP Rep. Scott Tipton last month, has already dropped out. That leaves Democrats without any declared candidates to take on Tipton, a sophomore.

ID-02: GOP Rep. Mike Simpson, who faces a tea party primary challenge from the right, has mostly been looking to shore up his conservative bona fides on the economic front, but he's not averse to some Second Amendment remedies, too. On Monday, the NRA endorsed Simpson, who has earned an A+ rating from the group.

PA-06: Businessman and Army veteran Mike Parrish has dropped out of the race for Pennsylvania's open 6th District and endorsed physician (and fellow vet) Manan Trivedi, the lone remaining candidate for the Democratic nomination. While Parrish had locked up a good deal of D.C. establishment support, he'd only recently switched over from the GOP and lacked the local backing and name recognition of Trivedi, who unsuccessfully sought this seat the last two cycles. Now Democrats will have to hope that the third time's the proverbial charm for Trivedi, who will face Chester County Commissioner Ryan Costello, the consensus Republican choice, in November.

ME-02: The League of Conservation Voters has endorsed state Sen. Emily Cain, who is seeking Rep. Mike Michaud's open seat and is running against fellow state Sen. Troy Jackson in the Democratic primary.

TX-04: A new survey from dodgy Republican pollster Wenzel Strategies, on behalf of the conservative Now or Never PAC, finds former U.S. Attorney John Ratcliffe leading Rep. Ralph Hall 47-35 in the GOP primary runoff scheduled for May 27. Hall prevailed in the first round of voting, but with a fairly soft 45 percent, while Ratcliffe finished second with 29.

VA-08: Wow—it's an extremely rare Oprah Alert! It's not often that the one-time queen of daytime talk gets involved in the political arena, but Oprah Winfrey is headlining an April 5 fundraiser in Arlington for former non-profit CEO Lavern Chatman, who is seeking the Democratic nomination for Virginia's open 8th Congressional District. In a crowded field like this one, this is a particularly good get for Chatman, seeing as Winfrey's very short list of prior endorsees is pretty much limited to Cory Booker and Barack Obama.

WA-04: State Sen. Sharon Brown says she won't run in the GOP primary to replace retiring Rep. Doc Hastings, and she isn't endorsing anyone else, either. A large field of Republicans is already in the race, including state Sen. Janea Holmquist Newbry, former state Department of Agriculture director Dan Newhouse, Franklin County Commissioner Brad Peck, and former NFL player Clint Didier.

Grab Bag:

Maine: Filing closed Monday for Maine's June 10 primary. The state has a list of major party candidates available here.

Republican Gov. Paul LePage is seeking another term, but he has a tough race ahead of him. Democrats have recruited Rep. Michael Michaud, who represents half the state in the House. Neither candidate has any primary foes. The conservative LePage has proven to be quite controversial and unpopular in this Democratic-leaning state, but the presence of left-leaning independent (and 2010 candidate) Eliot Cutler makes things somewhat more unpredictable. (The deadline for independents to file has not yet passed, so Cutler's name is not on the candidate list). Daily Kos rates this as Leans Democratic.

To the disappointment of Democrats, Republican Sen. Susan Collins is running again. The incumbent has proven to be incredibly popular and has scared off any would-be primary challengers. The only Democrat is former ACLU state director Shenna Bellows. We had this rated as a Race to Watch due to some less-than-definitive statements from Collins about whether she would run again. However, now that it's certain Collins will once again be the Republican nominee, we're moving this to Safe Republican.

Both parties have competitive races to succeed Michaud in ME-02. On the Democratic side, state Sen. Emily Cain faces Senate Majority Leader Troy Jackson and Some Dude Alden Smith. The Republican field consists of former Treasure Bruce Poliquin and former state Senate President Kevin Raye, who was the Republican nominee in 2002 and 2012. The district backed Obama 53-44, and we rate the general election as Lean Democratic. There's a lot less drama in the state's other House seat, where Democratic Rep. Chellie Pingree has no primary foe and is safe in November. (Jeff Singer)

Originally posted to Daily Kos Elections on Wed Mar 19, 2014 at 05:00 AM PDT.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  MT-Sen: non-partisan ad: interesting contrast with (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Democratic incumbent John Walsh's emphasis on protecting civil liberties from the surveillance state.

    Is it possible that Daines hopes not to fight this election on that issue?

  •  In the meantime, (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Sherri in TX, Amber6541, Aquarius40, wader

    the anti-ACA, anti-Gary Peters Koch Bros. ads are still running here in SE Michigan. Doesn't matter how debunked they are, they're running them anyway. No shame.

    •  And to add to that, Mighty Mouth Chris Christie (4+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Amber6541, wader, ChemBob, stevenaxelrod

      is on his way to MI to fundraise for Governor Snyder and Terri Lynn Land, the GOP Senate candidate running against Gary Peters.  Land, who has no public presence, appears to be locked in a tower in the Mackinac Center think tank and told to keep her mouth shut lest she reveal she lacks luster and ideas and is a mere handmaiden to the Kochs, DeVoses and other rightwing interests in the state.

      Building a better America with activism, cooperation, ingenuity and snacks.

      by judyms9 on Wed Mar 19, 2014 at 06:53:35 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  that's why we need some on air pushback NOW (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      ChemBob, Trosk, stevenaxelrod

      Too much of this stuff is being allowed to pass.

      The tables need to be turned. Where are the positive, I have insurance  now and can focus on getting well thanks to obamacare and the dems. Or I am saving so much money, thanks to obamacare, I can buy a car, or take my kids out to dinner. I am a job creator now, instead of a drag on the economy. Or x thousand jobs have been created in the insurance and healthcare industries, thanks to obamacare.

      Or I can't go to the doctor because the republicans won't expand Medicaid. Cancer is not a disease that is managed at the emergency room. Republicans are condemning me to an early death.

      The ads I am seeing are lame.
      We need some in your face, simple messaging that beats back this obamacare is evil meme.

      Today's problems are yesterday's solutions. Don Beck

      by Sherri in TX on Wed Mar 19, 2014 at 07:08:43 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  affordable healthcare (0+ / 0-)


  •  A good, solid 20% of voters (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Aquarius40, wader

    (if not more) are reliable suckers for GOP lies.

    Republicans know their target audience.

  •  If you're explaining you're losing. (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    wader, side pocket

    They count on this tactic. Make some statement that has taken a fact and twisted it or misconstrued statistics - and put it in an attention getting headline.

    IT sells.

    People won't wait for, or hear, or WANT to hear 'the explanation'.  We're talking low information voters who barely have time to hear a soundbite. They're too busy struggling to make ends meet.

    Never bring a knife to a gun fight.

    Hit back. HARD. With outrageous statements that they will have to explain. Then hit them again.

    REPUBLICANS are stealing your savings!

    YOUR BOSS enslaves workers.

    CORPORATIONS are taking away your children!

    BUSINESS buys your privacy!

    The GOP Prime Directive: Be Silent - Consume - DIE!

    by Lance Bearer on Wed Mar 19, 2014 at 06:47:29 AM PDT

  •  The problem was with the way the CBO (0+ / 0-)

    worded things:

    The budget office has now increased its estimate of the size of these effects. It believes that health reform will reduce the number of hours worked in the economy by between 1.5 percent and 2 percent, which it unhelpfully noted “represents a decline in the number of full-time-equivalent workers of about 2.0 million.”
    That essentially means "lost jobs" - if it meant that people would voluntarily work less they should have said that.

    And if they actually meant that people would voluntarily work less, why wouldn't the vast army of unemployed Americans who are seeking work step in and fill those jobs, thus resulting in there being no reduction in the number of hours worked across the economy?

  •  It doesn't help not to acknowledge actual problems (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    The Dead Man

    I agree of course that the Koch Bros ads are completely misleading and often times downright lies.  However, what I always liked about Daily Kos and "our" side is that it presented an even handed assessment of the topics.

    It seems these days with ObamaCare Daily Kos, the Democratic Politicians and anyone on our "side" feels like it is their duty to defend the policy against all naysayers.

    The truth though is that while some major protections are included in the new law there are MAJOR faults and issues and as it stands without change is not really a great law at all.

    Everyone seems to just acknowledge now that premiums will continue to go up - maybe significantly.  Many here just point out insurance companies always did that so why complain now.  Well the reason to complain is that the whole point of the healthcare cost problem was that they constantly went up - a law that was supposed to fix heathcare was supposed to address that in a real way.  Instead we have a law that has a few protections and some savings but basically at it's core is an insurance payment system leaving practically ALL control still in the hands of the insurance companies.  

    So yes they always did that and its nothing new that they try to jack up the prices but then what was the point?  We didn't like the Medicare Plan D prescription program because while it did supply medicine to the elderly - because of the lack of controls the drugs companies kept all the power and it was just a way for them to make more money off of the government and elderly.  The point is there was a better way to have the same results of medicine but with more controls on the businesses wanting to make money off of it (i.e. the ability to negotiate prices, etc).

    Another big topic here is the "junk" cheap plans that people lost and they I guess should be grateful for because now they have plans that are much better for them.  The truth is a little more complicated though.  The EPO junk plans covered much more then some people realize and in a lot of ways were much simpler (no referrals needed - better Dr network).  It had drawbacks yes but it actually covered the basic heath and also most catastrophic situations with holes in the middle.  I know this from direct experience with a friend - at least the EPO I know of it was not perfect but it was NOT junk and its insulting to the people paying a lot more now and in some cases getting less care and jumping through more hoops just to pass them off as junk when they are brought up.

    As it turns out some of the new plans that are more expensive can be described as junk also if you so choose.  After premiums which you may get help with - pretty much ALL care besides basic checkups are 100% out of the pockets costs up to some hefty deductibles (which you get 0% help with).  That can prevent people from going to the Doctor.  Also on the Bronze and Silver plans the networks have shrunk considerably (again you can blame insurance companies but that is how the law is built to give them control) and also almost all the bronze and silver plans cut people of out specialized hospitals for more severe issues.  So now yes you have healthcare with upper limits in costs and less restrictions on treatments but you can't go to the places that really know how to treat the big ones.

    Anyway - I just ask that people here acknowledge that there are still MAJOR issues with the law that aren't going to be fixes with the way congress is now and stop sugar coating everything.  Do we so quickly forget how important the public option was that doesn't exists now and would have taken some control from the insurance companies we blame for all costs increases?

    Working together to save the world

    by CaseyK24 on Wed Mar 19, 2014 at 07:39:23 AM PDT

  •  "Someone else" for FL-Gov is attractive (0+ / 0-)

    I wish I could get excited about Crist, but I can't. I wish I had any confidence in Nan Rich's ability to actually fight on a statewide level, but I don't.

    Have you heard? The vice president's gone mad. - Bob Dylan, 1966

    by textus on Wed Mar 19, 2014 at 08:13:35 AM PDT

  •  Anti-Udall ad in CO (Americans For Prosperity) (0+ / 0-)

    Clicked on an online ad sponsored by AFP tying Senator Udall to 'Obamacare'

    It was the swill I expected from AFP.

    (Where do they find these actors, anyway???)

    "That was not disorder, Governor. That was democracy." -Wendy Davis, Senator, D-Texas, District 10

    by Maverick80229 on Wed Mar 19, 2014 at 08:13:53 AM PDT

  •  SC-Gov (0+ / 0-)

    I think we're looking at the anti ACA campaign all wrong.  Stop defending what the benefits are against the lies.   Bring up examples (other states) where coverage has increased, their (SC in this example) state is being left behind and hospitals are going broke (lack of Medicaid funding).  

    Counterstrike that people in SC (and the other non-medicaid states) are LOOSING healthcare, because ACA IS successful elsewhere.

    What the Right fears more than anything is the success of the ACA.  Where it is not complete, Trumpet the success of other state's ACA.  Its a fear campaign among the uneducated, fear of loosing job vs. fear of loosing all healthcare (closing hospitals, no Medicaid).

    ... the watchword of true patriotism: "Our country - when right to be kept right; when wrong to be put right." - Carl Schurz; Oct. 17, 1899

    by NevDem on Wed Mar 19, 2014 at 08:24:20 AM PDT

  •  Headline: Lindsey Graham Funnels Campaign (0+ / 0-)

    Donation$ to Putin and Russia, Draws Israeli Ire.

    A recent campaign video, paid for, directed and staring  Lindsey Beauregard Graham, US Sen. SC. used footage from Russian Television depicting an Israeli and American flag being burned at an alleged demonstration.

    RT presenter Yakoff Smirnuv stated today, on air, that the footage was staged at the behest of Graham for an allegedly undisclosed amount of $1.2 million in production costs and overhead.

    Ms. Smirnuv also blockquoted an Israeli official known only as Benjy da Net as saying

    We were duped into paying for half of this footage by Senator Graham who promised to not use a real Israeli flag which was to be placed no closer than 3 feet from the US flag which was the only flag that was to be burned. We will not take this abuse from the Obama Administration

    Mr. da Net then promised to refer the matter to the UN Security Council seeking sanctions against the US to include travel restrictions against Mr. Bo Obama, a prominent US canine expert, as well as freezing all his kibble assets held in international banks and financial institutions.

    Despite numerous requests from RT, Bo Obama would not return comment on his alleged involvement in the international incident.

    Ms. Smirnuv then promptly resigned her position, on air, as RT's number two rated presenter.

    21st Century America: The distracted, superficial perception of a virtual reality. Gettov Milawn

    by geez53 on Wed Mar 19, 2014 at 08:36:37 AM PDT

  •  WA-04 (0+ / 0-)

    Technically, there is no "Republican primary" as we have a Top Two system.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site