Skip to main content

I like to call it the "Pee on Me and Tell Me it is Raining" plan. It's pretty similar to "trickle down". In fact, it isn't actually a plan so much as it is simply reassuring you that "trickle down" is working for you. I opened my local rag this morning to be treated to the musings  of Walter Williams, corporatist shill extraordinaire.

Many economists, politicians and pundits assert that median wages have stagnated since the 1970s. That's a call for government to do something about it. But before we look at the error in their assertion, let's work through an example that might shed a bit of light on the issue.

Suppose that you paid me a straight $20 an hour in 2004. Ten years later, I'm still earning $20 an hour, but in addition, now I'm receiving job perks such as health insurance, an employer-matched 401(k) plan, paid holidays and vacation, etc. Would it be correct to say that my wages have stagnated and I'm no better off a decade later? I'm guessing that the average person would say, "No, Williams, your wages haven't stagnated. You forgot to include your non-monetary wages."

Let's ignore that he starts out using the 1970's as a baseline then quickly narrows gains down to those that occurred during the debt fueled housing boom that collapsed our economy while enriching the very rich and focus on his use of an imaginary anecdotal story as evidence. It doesn't get better. He then goes on to quote an OpEd from the WSJ in case you were skeptical of how awesome you really have it.
They start out saying: "Many pundits, politicians and economists claim that wages have fallen behind productivity gains over the last generation. ... This story, though, is built on an illusion. There is no great decoupling of worker pay from productivity. Nor have workers' incomes stagnated over the past four decades." There are two routinely made mistakes when wages are compared over time. "First, the value of fringe benefits -- such as health insurance and pension contributions -- is often excluded from calculations of worker pay. Because fringe benefits today make up a larger share of the typical employee's pay than they did 40 years ago (about 19 percent today compared with 10 percent back then), excluding them fosters the illusion that the workers' slice of the (bigger) pie is shrinking."
So because "fringe benefits" are "often" excluded from worker pay and these "fringe benefits" make up a larger share of the "typical" employee's pay it just makes it seem like your life sucks way more now than it did back then. But the pie is bigger and we will happily continue to give you peons the urine soaked crusts. Now smile and be happy!

After some more quoting of data from back during the housing boom we get this gem of a conclusion...

Boudreaux and Palagashvili conclude that "middle-class stagnation and the 'decoupling' of pay and productivity are illusions. Yes, the U.S. economy is in the doldrums, thanks to a variety of factors, most significantly the effect of growth-deadening government policies like ObamaCare and the Dodd-Frank Act. But by any sensible measure, most Americans are today better paid and more prosperous than in the past."
It brings back memories of old Phil Gramm and his "mental recession" and "nation of whiners" quotes. Now quit whining and get back to work, slackers.
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  I refuse to accept (7+ / 0-)

    urine soaked crusts for tips...

    ~War is Peace~Freedom is Slavery~Ignorance is Strength~ George Orwell "1984"

    by Kristina40 on Thu Mar 20, 2014 at 05:09:31 AM PDT

  •  Those fringe benefits have been dwindling as (8+ / 0-)

    productivity has been rising.  Part time and minimum wage jobs never provided fringe benefits to begin with, which is why the ACA was so necessary.  Pensions are dying off or seriously endangered if one's company or governmental entity is in tough shape like the City of Detroit. Fringe benefits for the majority were largely the result of union efforts.  At the professional level they were recruiting sweeteners.
    Bottom line:  Williams and others wish to bask in their own smug illusions of largesse toward the masses.    

    Building a better America with activism, cooperation, ingenuity and snacks.

    by judyms9 on Thu Mar 20, 2014 at 05:20:22 AM PDT

  •  Cue Joe Isuzu: "He's Lying." (7+ / 0-)
    That's a call for government to do something about it. But before we look at the error in their assertion, let's work through an example that might shed a bit of light on the issue.

    Suppose that you paid me

    --Since no conservative can ever win any economic argument when history and hard numbers are permitted, as soon as a historical fact or trend is introduced, the conservative switches the subject to hypotheticals in their imaginary world.

    But what a monstrous example. Between 2004 and 2014 came the global economic crash, and we have hard numbers that the entire bottom 80-90% of Americans are earning less income in 2014 than they were in 2004 and even earlier.

    Nobody (considered by economic strata) but the top few % made any gains of any kind between 2004 and 2014.

    He misspelled "1964" and "1974."

    We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for victims of our nation and for those it calls enemy.... --ML King "Beyond Vietnam"

    by Gooserock on Thu Mar 20, 2014 at 05:38:22 AM PDT

  •  This is where the war will be fought, (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    hnichols, bbctooman, Janet 707, qofdisks

    with the mass extinction of jobs, as big computers force us to redefine why we should be paid at all. Only a small percentage of contributors at this website are being paid, much of the economy will be like that within a few decades.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site