Skip to main content

If you've been wondering why content creators have been fleeing YouTube for quite a while now, it has everything to do with Google's ridiculously corporate-favoring ContentID system and the fact that it's managed to destroy the finances of several users, triggering a small-but-notable exodus off Youtube and towards private hosts, as well as alternatives to Youtube such as Blip, Dailymotion, and Vimeo.

But nothing could prepare me to the revelation that awaited my inbox this morning when a favorite Youtube gaming editorial guy, AlphaOmegaSin, revealed a bombshell in that Youtube was in the process of appointing Super-Flaggers, which have the ability to flag and instantly delete videos or even accounts that violate rules and take down anything that qualifies as "offensive" or "hate speech."

All of which seems like a simple shake-up in their policies.... Until you realize that these Super-Flaggers include government agencies (which may or may not include our pals at the NSA), major corporations, and more, and essentially give these already ridiculously-powerful entities even more tools in their arsenal to censor and control messaging.

Follow me below the Squiggle for more, people.

For the uninitiated, since Youtube was acquired by Google, it's suffered a steady downward slide. Between altering search results so that popular videos get top billing, to demanding users get and use Google Plus accounts that nobody asked for, to attempts to force users to reveal their full names when commenting, Google's additions to Youtube have been rife with horrible ideas that have mostly done little but infuriate the community to no end. All of these have been widely-criticized, and yet no matter how much flak has been thrown at Google over it, it's never once responded to criticisms, mostly content to bunker down behind the "my site, my rules" excuse, which has led to multiple users leaving Youtube entirely, save for token things deployed here: Channel Awesome, for example, has several users which use Blip specifically because they got fed up with Youtube's policies, whereas video game commentators like JohnTron decided upon their own unique work-arounds.

A huge amount of users began to leave, however, during two specific major incidents in Youtube's recent history: Forced integration with Google Plus, and the absolutely horrendous Content ID System Changes, which have enabled major copyright holders to claim ownership and monetization of videos for seconds worth of audio, or even over spurious claims. This scatter-shot copyright claim nonsense has been widely criticized, and has gotten a number of channels taken down or subverted via this nonsense; an in-depth guide to working within Youtube's asinine Content ID System is here, and worth watching. The recent changes caused many reviewers of games and movies to accrue ridiculous numbers of Content ID notifications and removal notices, during which time the company placing the Content ID strike gets to monetize the video in the original creator's stead. Suffice to say, this attitude of putting rights-holders ahead of the end user angered many users, and began the first rumblings of open revolt against Youtube's policies.

Strangely, Youtube responded by getting even worse.

The recent Super-Flagger revelation, seen here on CNET, is freaking terrifying. The wording of the Super-Flagger responsibilities are intentionally incredibly nebulous, and would effectively allow these appointed defenders to take down anything that qualifies as "hate speech" or which could "incite violence."

And even better, each Super-Flagger can be an organization.

Whilst there's no definitive evidence that the NSA is one of those Super Flaggers yet, it's a pretty damned good possibility, especially given what we know about Google/Government coordination in the past, and of their reaction to the likes of Snowden.

Color me surprised.

Me? I'm planning to eventually move my crappy channel to Vimeo. At least there, my little not-for-profit Fair Game Show won't be molested endlessly by copyright claims years after I've posted the video itself.

EDIT: I was a bit annoyed to learn that despite the title on the news tickers for the News.nom article above, the NSA has not yet been implicitly implicated. Operative word being yet. Until confirmation has arrived, however, I have edited accordingly.

EDIT TWO: Holy shit, RecList. Thank you, all of you for helping to spread awareness of this issue.

Poll

Have you ever had a Youtube Video flagged for copyright by the ContentID System?

30%33 votes
50%54 votes
18%20 votes

| 107 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site