Skip to main content

Chris Hayes did an excellent take down of Republican responses and alternatives to Obamacre, which if I've incorrectly embedded here, can be found on the "All In" webiste from 2/14/14.

Hayes show's a clip of a Faux pundit ostensibly floating the idea of a Public Option.  Hayes points out that the pundit is not advocating this policy, but rather using the rhetoric to attack.  He then demonstrates the Wrong's long tradition of doing just that.  All healthcare reforms that have ever been proposed by Republicans are only proposals- talking points with which to attack.

This has now become standard operating procedure for the GOP.  Please follow me for more.

The default setting for the Republican mind is that government cannot solve the problem, because government IS the problem.  Since that is the belief, why would they propose government solutions?  Well, there are somethings that will not b denied, unlike climate change.

For example, everyone agrees that something must be done about the problems of illegal immigration.  Not everyone agrees on what the problems are or what should be done about them, but there is at least consensus that what must be done is, something.  Representative Paul Ryan told a group That immigration reform would happen eventually.  See!  He wants it to happen, he just can't say when.  Speaker John Boehner, when confronted at breakfast, told 2 young women that he'd love to be able to pass a bill and that he was looking for ways to make it happen.  There's real commitment for you.

They have now held 50 votes to repeal Obamacare.  They talk about putting out their own plan, but never do.  Obamacare has been the law for four years.  How long does it take to come up with an alternative?  The other thing about all those repeals is that they were wholly unnecessary.  They could have opened their own bill with a sentence to the effect that passage of their bill would render the ACA null and void.  Repealed and replaced all at the same time.

Even earlier.  During the height of the economic crisis, everybody acknowledged the need to do something.  The Republican response to the plan was always "not this."  Their anti-government bias really comes out regarding Social Security and Medicare.  Most people, including most Republicans will tell you that these programs work.  Republicans cannot say they don't, they'd be laughed out of office.  So they say they're unsustainable.  

Considering that they work, shouldn't the response be to make them sustainable?  Raising taxes to do so polls better than cutting them, even on the right.

Regardless of what you think about Global Warming, Hurricanes are real.  Mudlsides happen.  Economies falter.  Immigrants enter the country.  Bridges fall.  Would you rather the government run by people who don't think they can help or people who'd like to try?

Or let me put it this way:  These people have worked fewer days than previous Congresses and have passed fewer pieces of legislation than other Congresses and they are proud of it.  These "Takers" get paid over 3 times the median income in America and want to keep getting that money for literally doing nothing!

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site