Skip to main content

http://www.salon.com/...

[T]he only people still debating whether or not climate change is “real,” and caused by human activity, are the ones who aren’t doing the actual research. In an update to his ongoing project of reviewing the literature on global warming, [geochemist James Lawrence  Powell] went through every scientific study published in a peer-review journal during the calendar year 2013, finding 10,885 in total (more on his methodology here). Of those, a mere two rejected anthropogenic global warming.
Powell notes that very, very few of climate change deniers--who tend more towards filling Congressional hearings and cable "news" networks with their own carbon dioxide emissions--have ever written a peer-reviewed scientific article in support of their "position." That's because if you write an article subject to peer review for a scientific publication, you have to back it up with...evidence.

Many of the articles he reviewed contained multiple authors, which would yield an even starker divide (if that can be imagined). Powell also fairly debunks the two contrarian, single-authored studies as well.

Lindsay Abrams, assistant Editor at Salon, sums it up nicely, quoting Powell:

1. There a mountain of scientific evidence in favor of anthropogenic global warming and no convincing evidence against it.

2. Those who deny anthropogenic global warming have no alternative theory to explain the observed rise in atmospheric CO2 and global temperature.

These two facts together mean that the so-called debate over global warming is an illusion, a hoax conjured up by a handful of apostate scientists and a misguided and sometimes colluding media, aided and abetted by funding from fossil fuel companies and right wing foundations.

Business Insider adds some sharp perspective for those who would suggest that this overwhelming consensus is the product of some nefarious "groupthink." Quoting Ashutosh Jogalekar at Scientific American:
   I understand as well as anyone else that consensus does not imply truth but I find it odd how there aren’t even a handful of scientists who deny global warming presumably because the global warming mafia threatens to throttle them if they do. It’s not like we are seeing a 70-30% split, or even a 90-10% split. No, the split is more like 99.99-0.01%.

    Isn’t it remarkable that among the legions of scientists working around the world, many with tenured positions, secure reputations and largely nothing to lose, not even a hundred out of ten thousand come forward to deny the phenomenon in the scientific literature? Should it be that hard for them to publish papers if the evidence is really good enough? Even detractors of the peer review system would disagree that the system is that broken; after all, studies challenging consensus are quite common in other disciplines. So are contrarian climate scientists around the world so utterly terrified of their colleagues and world opinion that they would not dare to hazard a contrarian explanation at all, especially if it were based on sound science? The belief stretches your imagination to new lengths.

Powell's conclusion:
On the one side, we have a mountain of scientific evidence, on the other, ideology and arm-waving. On that basis, we are endangering our grandchildren’s future and pushing humanity toward the destruction of civilization.
This is what politicians discussing global warming will look like soon.

UPDATE: Salon updated the figure to 10,883 studies  (previously 10,853) and confirmed many were by multiple authors.

Originally posted to Dartagnan on Wed Mar 26, 2014 at 05:56 PM PDT.

Also republished by SciTech, Kitchen Table Kibitzing, and Climate Change SOS.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

JekyllnHyde, Alumbrados, Sylv, deben, daninoah, Powered Grace, Bob Love, CupaJoe, NYLefty, Stein, eeff, exNYinTX, hubcap, niemann, EricS, whenwego, mole333, otto, CanisMaximus, ivote2004, oceanview, thea lake, Alna Dem, jbalazs, wader, psnyder, Brian82, zerelda, ybruti, Sembtex, randallt, Steven D, vacantlook, vivadissent, rmx2630, environmentalist, rapala, marina, NoMoreLies, Jeffersonian Democrat, denise b, caul, subtropolis, chimene, ccasas, Simplify, ajsuited, ChemBob, YucatanMan, Laurence Lewis, Sun Tzu, skyounkin, Steve in Urbana, wbr, xaxnar, begone, Mother Mags, kovie, Patriot Daily News Clearinghouse, myboo, PianoGuy, Naniboujou, MTmofo, kck, Lefty Coaster, blueoasis, Ashaman, The Hindsight Times, DiesIrae, middleagedhousewife, blueoregon, MadMs, lynneinfla, crystal eyes, bstotts, cpresley, orrg1, tegrat, North Central, Cronesense, Habitat Vic, devis1, ColoTim, FishOutofWater, Mary Mike, FischFry, millwood, GeorgeXVIII, dizzydean, Assaf, JayC, mconvente, misterwade, JaxDem, wayoutinthestix, elwior, Buckeye Nut Schell, Sharon Wraight, KJG52, jamess, monkeybrainpolitics, Cassandra Waites, mofembot, petulans, doppler effect, forgore, Bule Betawi, Turn Left, Ran3dy, soarbird, CanyonWren, maryabein, Methinks They Lie, Ohiodem1, WakeUpNeo, rbird, TheOpinionGuy, Keith Pickering, Livvy5, LookingUp, Larsstephens, ruscle, Just Bob, FogCityJohn, LaughingPlanet, Susan Grigsby, Polly Syllabic, cordgrass, samanthab, anonevent, ban48, kenwards, ericlewis0, Oh Mary Oh, slice, Pakalolo, kerflooey, Bluefin, sowsearsoup, Nebraska68847Dem, trumpeter, marleycat, thomask, Ojibwa, Attack Gardener, BarackStarObama, unapologeticliberal, chira2, VTCC73, Marihilda, blackjackal, T100R, Laurel in CA, hulibow, IndieGuy, Eric Nelson, oldcrow, exatc, jan4insight, belinda ridgewood, Syoho, MartyM, dfwlibrarian, New Minas, etherealfire, Glen The Plumber, RonK, James Wells, Sue B, corpsechorus, doubledutch, Chaddiwicker, nomandates, simple serf, newinfluence, Oregonemom, HedwigKos, aresea, unfangus, entrelac, bob152, peterfallow, ET3117, Leeloo, KatrinD, nancyjones, pierre9045, lehman scott, waterstreet2013, Skyye, Caittus, Cadillac64, BMScott, Idontknowwhy

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site