Skip to main content

-- Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
The big picture on Wisconsin's job situation is this: The state now ranks ninth out of ten midwestern states in job growth after three-plus years under Gov. Scott Walker. But as the Wisconsin gubernatorial campaigns heat up for November, how does the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel continue to deal with statistics unfavorable to Walker's promise of 250,000 new jobs by the end of this year? Most recently, by burying actual news and fluffing up Walker's performance.

The state of Wisconsin gained not a single net job in February. In fact, Wisconsin had the second worst number of total job losses among all states last month, according to the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employers in Wisconsin shed an estimated 9,500 total public and private sector jobs in February, the bureau reported late last week.

Many smaller newspapers across Wisconsin made this bad news a headline story over the weekend. In the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel's grudging coverage, however, you had to look hard for its own report on Friday, inside the paper on the business pages. That story used most of its space explaining why the bad job numbers are not really credible -- in essence accepting without saying so the Walker administration's own spin. Meanwhile, the news story headlined the fact that the state's unemployment rate had declined slightly during the month -- a seeming contradiction that the newspaper had no trouble accepting at face value, despite its worry that the monthly job loss figures were dubious.

Journal Sentinel readers had to the wait until this morning to find further reference to the report, still hard to find on page two, deep in the Politifact Wisconsin column's recurring "Truth-o-Meter" report on how Walker's 250,000-new-jobs-by-2015 pledge is going.  

For starters, judging by the little graphic accompanying the piece (see above), casual readers might be persuaded to believe Walker's almost accomplished his goal. Look how far to the end the little green bar has gone. Wow! It must (as Walker frequently likes to say) be working, Wisconsin! But actually, Walker's only about 40 percent of the way to his goal, with virtually no chance of delivering on his promise. To its credit Politfact eventually gets around to mentioning that. Still, the paper says Walker's promise remains "in the works." Besides, as the newspaper reminds us from time to time, governors don't really create jobs, even though it continues to report on their activities as though they do.

The headline accompanying the Politifact piece is similarly unhelpful and even misleading: "Readjustments chip away at 2013 gains," The piece itself only obliquely references the bad job report for February. In so many words: Wisconsin tallies actual job losses in yet another month, but that's just because of "readjustment." By that reckoning, death totals from a June plane crash, upwardly reported in July, would only represent an unimportant "readjustment."

Politifact tried to explain the matter further, saying that "as usual this time of year" the February job numbers included "benchmarking," which it defined as revisions. That, it said, made the February decline seem worse. So, in other words: The losses should have been reported in earlier months, thus February's actual losses are not really as bad as they look, and while earlier losses were worse than previously reported, never mind, because that was then and this is now. Oh. Okay.

If you wanted more detail on the February jobs report, Politifact helpfully provided an online hotlink so readers could click over to a Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development news release from last Thursday. Not only did the state's news release not mention the job losses, the link was completely broken as of Monday. So much for transparent government. We did an online search and found the document at a new URL. But now it was not a "news" release, but only a spin statement from the department's secretary, a Walker appointee, who totally ignored the job losses but fluffed the fact that Wisconsin's unemployment rate over the past year was a little better than across the nation as a whole. However, the secretary -- along with the Journal Sentinel's Friday story hyping the slight jobless rate decline -- discussed that rate without noting how many more out-of-work residents may have given up searching for work, which would, in fact, lower official unemployment.

Meanwhile, both the Journal Sentinel's Thursday news story and today's Politifact column again relied on the usual Walker excuse for bad monthly job reports. Early in his administration, when the job losses grew worse each month, Walker started ignoring the federal government's monthly jobs reports in favor of what he deemed more accurate quarterly reports. The Journal Sentinel went along with that, basically buying into Walker's argument that the quarterly Census on Employment and Wages report, based on actual hard jobs data, is more reliable than the sampled survey undertaken for the monthly report.

All right. But what happens when both the monthly and quarterly Wisconsin reports produce negative results?  Read on to see how a governor and a major Wisconsin newspaper evade that contradiction, and how the newspaper spent more of its time dissing Walker's Democrat challenger, blind to the forest because -- yet too often -- it insists upon staring at twigs.

The last quarterly Wisconsin jobs report, which was released last week and garnered widespread media coverage even in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel — showed Wisconsin fifth in the nation in manufacturing jobs gains but also 35th among the states in total job growth in 2013. The apparently high ranking on manufacturing jobs should be tempered by the fact that Wisconsin is so far behind other states in recent manufacturing growth that while an up-tick in percentage of growth looks great, the actual number of additional manufacturing jobs over the past year (about 6,000) still represents under-performance. But let's not get into all that pesky detail. We're number five! And look over there: the Wisconsin Badgers rock!

Meanwhile, Democratic gubernatorial candidate Mary Burke last week issued a lengthy and detailed economic development position paper -- matched, if you can call it that, by Walker's own, original three-page paper -- on how the state could better influence job growth. Doing its job, the Journal Sentinel's capitol bureau filed a story on Burke's paper. The newspaper's editorial board said the Burke paper was thoughtful and contained a "substantial" jobs plan, although the paper's chief political columnist pooh-poohed the plan as "stuffed with liberal giveaways." Unlike Walker's own simpler plan, stuffed with conservative giveaways.

For its part, Politfact Wisconsin poured over the 40-page report and zeroed in on a couple of passages that resulted in negative "Truth-O-Meter" ratings. One of them discussed low wages. Now, no one except perhaps the Republican Party disputes long-term statistics showing the nation's wages are lagging, with Wisconsin lagging yet further behind; this was especially the case for Wisconsin in 2012, Walker's second year in office.

The big picture notwithstanding, Politifact honed in on one word in Burke's report referring to those trends. According to Politifact, the report should have said Wisconsin wages "were" and not "are" declining. Poltifact's resulting, literal and blaring judgment: Burke's pants are on fire!

Ironically, that negative Politifact ruling focused on how Burke's report avoids recognizing short-term, up-and-down fluctuations in Wisconsin wages. Fair enough. Yet with respect to Walker's job creation performance, other reporting in the newspaper continues to marginalize bad job-creation reports by saying short-term outcomes should largely be ignored. Well, which is it, Journal Sentinel editors? Are short-term economic outcomes significant, or aren't they?

Also ironic, Politifact's negative rating dissed that passage in Burke's report for cherry-picking data. Again, fair dinkum, if in context, but what was Politifact doing in its analysis of her lengthy and detailed report other than itself cherry-picking selected phraseology?

A recent report by Madison's Wisconsin State Journal -- a newspaper at least as conservative editorially as the Journal Sentinel -- showed that despite dealing with the Great Recession, the state did better on the jobs front under Democratic Gov. Jim Doyle than under Republican Gov. Walker.

Meanwhile, no one -- actually not even Politifact -- disputes data indicating Wisconsin wages overall have lagged the nation's generally poor performance. But if you read the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel and especially rely on Politifact Wisconsin's rulings, what you probably will come away with is the distorted idea that, with regard to her statements on wages, Mary Burke's pants are on fire while Walker's job-creation efforts are "underway" and looking okay -- if only very, very vaguely, negatively okay.

Originally posted to Ron Legro on Mon Mar 31, 2014 at 10:01 AM PDT.

Also republished by Badger State Progressive.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  The GOP and its allies have never been big (7+ / 0-)

    on facts.

    The problem with ideologues is that they are so convinced their ideology is correct they don't care about results. The fact of the matter is that GOP economic principles are a big fail. However, those principles are secondary to the hunger for power.

    I wish Wisconsin would wake up like Maine has lately and throw out the useless Teabaggers. We haven't thrown out our governor yet--that will have to wait until November unless he's impeached which is, by the way, a slim possibility, but we've made him a lame duck by returning the lege to the Democrats.

    Pope Francis: the Thumb of Christ in the eyes of the Pharisees.

    by commonmass on Mon Mar 31, 2014 at 10:15:50 AM PDT

  •  Pathetic isnt it!! (3+ / 0-)

    Walker would fall on his face if the Urinal wrote the Truth!! It is Sad, At times I'm like ok they are blast him and Nope, Fluff it up or Bury it. I keep my eye out for the Urinal's Live Chats, Only opportunity to challenge them on the BS.

    •  Full disclosure (6+ / 0-)

      Decades ago I worked as a reporter for the old Milwaukee Sentinel which, years after I left, merged with the old Milwaukee Journal to form the Journal Sentinel. And let me also say that I don't think most of what I am talking about in this blog post reflects conscious behavior across much of the newsroom. But it's clear that the marketroid, broadcast-centric, stock-options-happy executives of Journal Communications have over the years exerted increasing influence over editorial policy. It's clear, too, that the merged paper editorially has moved more toward the conservative ideology of the old Hearst-owned Sentinel than toward the moderate to liberal leanings of the old Journal.

      Moreover, the old firewall between newsroom and ad department, and between editors and company executives, is in decline. Circulation is down, and the newspaper's chosen solution is to cater more and more to elites.

      Meanwhile, the company's TV and radio operations, once high-quality operations, increasingly pander to the lowest common denominator and, in the case of radio, right-wing passions, in an increasingly ratings-driven environment.

      Journal Communications is, to put it bluntly, pretty much now The Establishment, or at least The Man.

      Dont' get me wrong. The paper includes many talented journalists and has won numerous Pulitzer Prizes in recent years for its investigative pieces. But that performance is marred by the paper's increasingly conservative editorial views, where organized labor doesn't have a place at the table and hard-right fiscal policies are cool. The editors still still have something of a social conscience when it comes to social issues and good government, but they also seem to have a huge case of macular degeneration when it comes to politicians like Walker, who has been a career politician exhibiting what I would argue is little substance beyond personal ambition and rigid, almost comically simplistic  ideological views; that, and his penchant for pushing the ethical and legal envelope while all but wrecking whatever's left of open, bipartisan government in our state.

      While the paper endorsed Walker, it also has to its credit been critical of him on occasion in its editorials, and has pulled few punches in the case of the John Doe closed-door probes into Walker's erasure of the state's strong firewall of laws  that strictly limit the interpenetration of campaigning and governing. But while catching Walker in numerous falsehoods on mostly trifling issues, the paper's Politifact regularly soft-pedals Walker's negative impact on the state's economy. Of course the paper never mentions its own conflict of interest re organized labor, given the unionized employees under its own roof, unions that the company has thwarted by widening means made possible by a Republican-influenced, laissez faire  National Labor Relations Board prior to Obama.

      I also see the Journal Sentinel still regarding Rep. Paul Ryan as a thoughtful, even-handed intellectual of some kind and not the hypocritical. cynical, average-IQ hack he really is. Sen. Ron Johnson? The JS seldom mentions him any longer outside of straight news coverage. Too painful to consider his dismal performance, perhaps. I think some of this has to do with favorite-son reporting, or maybe it's a case of, "He may be a SOB, but he's our SOB." Either way, it doesn't speak well of the paper's approach to state issues. Nor does its announced position some while back that it will no longer endorse political candidates. That's one way to have your cake and eat it, too, I suppose.

      It's as if the Journal Sentinel managers and editors know Walker, and Ryan, and Johnson, and much of the tea party-driven state legislature, is a disaster but they are reluctant to come right out and say so. Meanwhile they increasingly cater to their ad base, which consists of ever-more concentrated, cash-rich businesses that tend to support Republicans and their counterproductive agenda, which in turn tends only to benefit the one percent. It's an incestuous, messed-up time for muckraking journalism and true populism. I'm certain many reporters and some editors are fair-minded and fact-obsessed, but while the paper urges legislative redistricting reform and campaign spending restraints, and nominally suppports "Obamacare," it just doesn't seem to have its heart in it any more.

      Comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable: That's still a good starting point for any Fourth Estate institution geared to influencing positive change while retaining a large, engaged following.

  •  The incestuous relationship (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    nadd2, Jollie Ollie Orange, jorogo

    between Wisconsin corporate media and right wing politicians like Scott Walker should be obvious.  The deluge of campaign advertising made possible by the 30 plus million thrown at Scott Walker alone is enough to pump a heck of a lot of green blood into the circulatory system of the for profit media.  Such "investments" go a long way toward buying the complicity of these media outlets in maintaining the Scott Walker's of the world in office.  The ownership of said media doesn't want their profit center compromised.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site