Skip to main content

A lot of us are here for the purported goal of electing more and better Democrats.

This is my small contribution towards that endeavor.

I have been inspired by the Pennsylvania Gubernatorial Democratic Primary. Here, we have an example of how the Primaries can actually result in a stronger candidate coming out of them. The notable candidates currently: Tom Wolf, Rob McCord, Katie McGinty, Allyson Schwartz, from what I have gathered, are all solid Democratic candidates. None of them are perfect by any means, but by and large, they stand for the values that the Democratic Party is meant to represent.

The question is: who should we, the Dailykos community who are the lifeblood of the Left Wing, vote for, and how do we decide?

Here is what I propose: A Crowdsourced Progressive Ticket

As most of us know, when we go to vote, there is often someone passing out a paper listing how a person should vote for every option on the ballot based on the political party.

The Progressive ticket would be for those of us who want, within the Democratic options, to choose the most Progressive.

For the majority of the elections in the US's two-party system, this extra ticket may not be necessary. However, there are some cases where it would be good for the Liberal voter to have a choice other than what's on the ballot.

One of the cases where this would probably be more important is for primaries, where there are multiple Democratic candidates, and there may be confusion over which Democrat offers the best Progressive option.

It could also be useful in elections like Alabama's Senate election, where Democrats failed to get a candidate to challenge Jeff Sessions. We could come up with a write-in option for Alabama Dems who will be going to the polls anyways. It may not mean much in that election, but it could also be useful for building name recognition going forward.

Another example would be in states with unusual primary systems, like California. Having a clear candidate for the Left would help build consensus.

The other part of the equation is how, in elections such as these, do we decide who the Progressive choice should be? Here is where the crowdsourcing comes in.

Dailykos Elections is an invaluable resource when it comes to covering elections, and a lot of the function this project covers may seem redundant. But often times, their reporting is impartial more than endorsing any particular candidates (other than just Democrat over Republican), perhaps for good reason. And even though the Dailykos official leadership often endorses candidates, they tend to focus on only a few special cases. Also, perhaps for good reason.

Regardless, I think a major factor that gets left out of this process, that I think is actually worth including, is the wider Dailykos community of volunteer activists, grassroots organizers, bloggers, commenters, and even well-meaning lurkers. And if that is going to happen, we have to be the ones to take the initiative.

In effect, as a community, those of us here at Dailykos will put it to a vote. But there should also be substance behind the vote.

The plan I have in my mind goes something like this (though obviously there will likely be modifications before and well into the process). For a disputed election, a new diary is put up giving a general overview of the election and the Democratic candidates. In the comments, kossacks discuss the merits of each candidate, personal interactions with that candidate, etc. The next day, a second diary is written, including constructive excerpts from the previous diary's comments. A poll is also included on the second diary, and based on the poll's results after 24 hours, and if necessary, taking the commentary into account, a candidate is chosen. Results from these diaries are then collected in a central location, with links back to the relevant diaries.

For 2014, I think we could do something like this at least for the federal level (US Reps and Senators), and statewide offices, for all 50 states, in time for the General Election.

In the end, I envision a site along the lines of brainwrap's ACAsignups, as a clearinghouse for the Progressive Ticket. All you have to do is look up your district, and there will be a list of all the candidates, plus links to the diaries/polls used to come up with the pick. Perhaps if someone with a good bit of coding experience in this area gets involved, a printable ticket you can take with you to the polls on Election Day is possible. Of course, this idea is still in its infancy, and such grand designs are still a long ways off. Still, this is where I'd like to see this head.

In regards to the overall purpose alone, the usefulness of this project may seem very narrow. In a majority of the elections, the Progressive option is very clear.

However, I also see this project serving more larger goals as well.

Building a deeper Progressive Bench

One of the problems Progressives have is finding candidates who truly represent our values. For every Elizabeth Warren, there's ten other Progressive candidates out there, struggling just to make it onto the ballot in some backwoods somewhere. This is an opportunity to build their exposure and name recognition, align them with other Progressives, and perhaps even discover the next Warren. And overall, identify and enumerate the Progressive candidates that are out there.

Unifying the base of the Democratic Party

The more Progressive options we identify, the more options we have to support, to campaign for and phone bank for and donate to, or even if it's just supporting them at the polls.

One of the greatest problems Democrats face, especially in midterms such as 2014, is getting our base to turn out. First and foremost, if we want them to turn out, they need strong candidates that they will be energized to turn out for. And better yet, having more than one to vote for.

Taking the power back from the oligarchs and returning it to the masses

Let's face it, most of us feel left behind by the Democratic Party's leadership, who kowtow to their corporate masters about as much as one would expect from the GOP.

This would be one way to take some of that power back. If we do not like the candidate that the Party is putting forth, now we can identify and rally around one we do.

For these reasons, I think all the work that would go into a Progressive Ticket is well worth the effort.

So now, I am looking for feedback from the rest of you.

First of all, I'm looking for feedback on the idea in general. Good idea? Horrible idea? Waste of time? What aspects have I left out? What areas could use more work?

I would also like to know if anyone is interested in helping. It could simply be hosting the diaries specific to candidates in your district. Or maybe you want to lead for your whole state. Either way, I do think crowd sourcing is an asset in a project like this.

I would also like to hear suggestions for Progressives/Elections to feature as some of these races. PA-Gov is a start, but I'm sure there's plenty to highlight.

Towards these ends, I have started a new Dailykos Group: Electing Better Democrats: The Progressive Ticket. If you think you'd be interested in helping, go ahead and message me.

I'm excited about the prospects for Democrats in 2014. I'm excited about the prospects for Democrats in my state. and I'm excited about the prospects for Democrats across the country.

For these reasons, I want to make a difference, if even on a small scale.

Even if you don't agree on how we get there, let's at least agree on this: more and better Democrats.

Poll

This

71%5 votes
28%2 votes
0%0 votes
0%0 votes

| 7 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (5+ / 0-)

    "In a country well governed, poverty is something to be ashamed of. In a country badly governed, wealth is something to be ashamed of.” -Confucius

    by pierre9045 on Fri Apr 04, 2014 at 04:50:09 AM PDT

  •  I love this idea (4+ / 0-)

    DKos is really a proactive place and I think this kind of effort is perfectly in tune with what we all hope to do here.

    In Oregon, the Family Working Party and Pacific Green Party endorsements are often a good indication of progressive values.

    We have it within our power to make the world over again ~ Thomas Paine

    by occupystephanie on Fri Apr 04, 2014 at 05:18:18 AM PDT

  •  Fine idea (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    BMScott

    However it must be used in moderation. As long it is only applied in states like Massachusetts and not Louisiana. Progressives are great. However, the job of an elected official is to represent their constituents. That is why I like Mark Begich, Mark Warner, and Mary Landrieu. It's also why I like Elizabeth Warren. Moderates must be nominated if necessary. Progressives if possible. I worry some users of DK will not see that. I wish you luck, but be careful.

    •  I think Kossacks are a pragmatic bunch (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      unfangus

      IIRC a recent dKos poll favored Nunn over more progressive candidates in GA senate race.

    •  The larger point of this idea (0+ / 0-)

      is that unlike conventional political tickets, where you are just told who to vote for, the progressive ticket would collect commentary and information about candidates along the way. Therefore, it becomes easier for voter to come to their own conclusions on who they would rather vote for. I think it's alright to take the factors you say into consideration.

      "In a country well governed, poverty is something to be ashamed of. In a country badly governed, wealth is something to be ashamed of.” -Confucius

      by pierre9045 on Fri Apr 04, 2014 at 10:41:36 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site