This diary is the second part of a little series of diaries that will try to find the path for a Democratic majority in the US Senate after the elections of 2018 thanks to some polls included in the diaries.
The series is trying to look at overall picture of at the following cycles. Since the current cycle until 2018. Three cycles where all the seats will have at least one ordinary election. If you prefer to be more focused in the short term, you can check my diary with the rating chart updated to April 1. But I think never is bad to look at the overall picture sometime.
Returning to the purpose of this diary, like the readers of the first diary of this little series know, we begin with a little analisys of the likely environment of the following elections, and from an easy but not too precise organization of the senate seats in two halfs, one including the most favourable territory and the other the less favourable.
As result of this analisys, we would have 38 senate seats in an area of relative confort for the Democratic Party, we would have 29 seats (including ME-Sen 2014) in the area of low hope for the Democratic Party and we would have 33 seats that we can rank with some polls. This is what you will see in the following rank.
The poll of the last diary was oriented to find the potential options with worse prospect for the readers. Some races get without votes (MT-Sen 2014, AR-Sen 2016, AK-Sen 2016 and TN-Sen 2018). There is not a chance for a worse result for the options that remain unpolled, then we can fix the position of these races in the rank.
In todays poll we will continue checking from worse to better prospect. For it we will take the options in the middle of the previous poll and some new options that we must also check in order to define the rank.
The races of the previous poll with better result skip today's poll (KY-Sen 2014, MT-Sen 2018, FL-Sen 2016 and AZ-Sen 2016).
RANK OF RACES IN THE PATH TO A DEMOCRATIC MAJORITY AFTER THE 2018 ELECTIONS
38.- seats in the area of relative confort
39.-
40.-
41.-
42.-
43.-
44.-
45.-
46.-
47.-
48.-
49.-
50.-
51.-
52.-
53.-
54.-
55.-
56.-
57.-
58.-
59.-
60.-
61.-
62.-
63.-
64.-
65.-
66.-
67.-
68.- MT-Sen 2014: The last Democratic incumbent, and surely the most endangered, J Walsh, has a serious challenger this year, and until now he seems not favored in the race. Again this race is rated as Lean R in my rating chart but with worse numbers than GA-Sen 2014 and KY-Sen 2014. J Walsh is also the alone Democratic incumbent that is not leading the fundraising side of the race.
69.- AR-Sen 2016: At this point surely only M Beebe can endanger the re-election of the Republican senator J Boozman. We know not exactly if M Beebe is popular enough to defeat him, but I would not rule out it. Also H Clinton running for President can help to the Democratic prospect in this race.
70.- AK-Sen 2016: The last election for this seat makes see all the weakness of L Murkowski in a Republican primary in her home state. It is possible to see another similar situation in 2016. The race at this point is so unpredictable and L Murkowski can even switch party. In the last years, M Begich proved that a success of the Democratic party is possible. After him, Clark Gruening is the former candidate to high level elections with better performance in his last race.
71.- TN-Sen 2018: The weakness of B Corker and the strength of the Democratic former governor P Bredesen can give to the Democratic Party some chance for this seat in 2018. The environment will be worse than in 2012, but still maybe possible to bid. If P Bredesen rule out a bid, the chance of the Democratic party decreases strongly.
72.- 29 seats in the area of very low hope (including ME-Sen 2014).
From the initial analysis we keep the structure and the short reference to the races without rank still.
DEFINING THE PATH TO A DEMOCRATIC MAJORITY AFTER THE 2018 ELECTIONS
Like it was explained, the most likely scenario in these years would be:
-2014: Neutral year with a number of difficult seats to defend.
-2016: Good year with a number of favourable seats to pursue.
-2018: Bad year with a number of difficult seats to defend.
To win the presidential election also helps to keep the majority in the senate because the Vice President and President of the US Senate is also the tiebreaker in case of tie. It means that the winner party needs only 50 senate seats for a majority.
Roughly, for the Democratic party of today, the easier path to keep the majority after 2018 would be:
To have 50 seats + Democratic Vice President as tiebreaker:
-46 senators from the 23 D+ states.
-2 senators from VA (EVEN)
-1 senator from OH (R+1): S Brown
-1 senator from FL (R+2): W Nelson
Minus the seats that the Democratic Party can lose between these 50 options in 2014, 2016 and 2018:
-WI-Sen 2018 : T Baldwin
-FL-Sen 2018: W Nelson
-VA-Sen 2018: T Kaine
-OH-Sen 2018: S Brown
-WI-Sen 2016: R Feingold? (R Johnson)
-IL-Sen 2016: M Obama? (M Kirk)
-PA-Sen 2016: E Rendell? (P Toomey)
-NV-Sen 2018: B Miller? (D Heller)
-NH-Sen 2016: M Hassan? (K Ayotte)
-NV-Sen 2016: H Reid
-IA-Sen 2016: T Vilsack? (C Grassley or Open by R)
-ME-Sen 2014: S Bellows (S Collins)
Plus other seats that the Democratic Party can win in less favourable states in 2014, 2016 and 2018:
-WV-Sen 2018: J Manchin
-AK-Sen 2014: M Begich
-NC-Sen 2014: K Hagan
-LA-Sen 2014: M Landrieu
-AR-Sen 2014: M Pryor
-MO-Sen 2018: C McCaskill
-ND-Sen 2018: H Heitkamp
-IN-Sen 2018: J Donnelly
-MT-Sen 2018: J Tester
-GA-Sen 2014: M Nunn (Open by R)
-KY-Sen 2014: A L Grimes (M McConnell)
-IN-Sen 2016: E Bayh? (D Coats)
-FL-Sen 2016: Open D (M Rubio)
-AZ-Sen 2016: G Giffords? (J McCain or Open by R)
-KY-Sen 2016: S Beshear? (R Paul)
-NC-Sen 2016: Open D (R Burr)
-MO-Sen 2016: J Nixon? (R Blunt)
-OH-Sen 2016: Open D (R Portman)
Note: The 23 D+ states (PVI) are HI, VT, NY, RI, MD, MA, CA, DE, NJ, CT, IL, ME, WA, OR, MI, NM, WI, MN, NV, IA, NH, PA and CO.
POTENTIALLY COMPETITIVE OR UNFAVOURABLE RACES IN THE 50 MOST FAVOURABLE SEATS (Minus)
WI-Sen 2018: T Baldwin is not specially weak, but her home state was the alone D+ state where a Democratic incumbent (R Feingold) has been deafeated in the last years (in a Republican wave). If the environment of 2018 becomes as hard as in 2010 this race can become a Toss-Up if the strongest Republicans run. At this point her strongest potential challenger can be the current governor S Walker.
FL-Sen 2018: W Nelson proved to be strong in Florida in 2012. The last year only J Bush polled enough well vs W Nelson to make the race a Toss-Up. If the Democratic senator retires not it seems difficult to see him endangered, even in a political environment worse than in 2012. The Republican bench in Florida is long but not too strong, because only a few of them have a statewide profile.
VA-Sen 2018: The Republican bench in Virginia is getting smashed in the last years, and in part thanks to T Kaine. Someone like J Kilgore can make the race competitive, but I'm not sure that he can make the race a Toss-Up.
OH-Sen 2018: S Brown can be challenged again. The Republican bench is stronger in Ohio than in Virginia, but maybe only the term limited governor J Kasich or a recovered M DeWine can make the race a Toss-Up.
WI-Sen 2016: R Johnson is also very endangered. In the last days we even read about him involved in some scandal. Between the potential challengers R Feingold is polling the strongest, and the race can become easily a rematch. Again, in this race the Democratic Party would be favored (a Lean D situation) but if weaker candidates run in the Democratic side the race can also enter in a Toss-Up situation.
IL-Sen 2016: M Kirk seems one of the most endangered Republican incumbents and will need to run in a unfavourable state in a likely unfavourable environment. Between the potential Democratic challengers according to some polls M Obama would have the best results. More likely candidates like L Madigan are also polling well. Still the race can down to a Toss-Up situation with lower level Democratic challengers.
PA-Sen 2016: The bench of potential challengers for the Republican incumbent P Toomey is very strong, including E Rendell, J Sestak and K Kane, and the Republican incumbent is polling weak. The race is a Toss-Up and it is a serious chance for another gain in 2016 for the Democratic Party.
NV-Sen 2018: D Heller won in 2012 underperforming M Romney in a state that M Romney lost. He is fairly weak. The strongest potential challenger for him would be the former governor R (Bob) Miller. Running with the best the race would not be worse than a Toss-Up, and even more potential challengers can make it a Toss-Up.
NH-Sen 2016: The prospect of a gain for the Democratic Party is serious here. M Hassan and J Lynch can make this race a Toss-Up. K Ayotte is seriously endangered.
IA-Sen 2016: The race for this seat can be competitive for the first time in decades. T Vilsack, the former governor and current Secretary of Agriculture in Obama's cabinet and H Clinton are putting enough pressure over C Grassley to retire. But even if C Grassley retires not the race can be competitive with T Vilsack.
NV-Sen 2016: This seat can be a lose if H Reid retires. At this point only three politicians can keep B Sandoval out of the senate seat. H Reid, Robert (Bob) Miller, the former Democratic governor, and B Sandoval himself, running for President or for Vice-President in 2016.
ME-Sen 2014: Unfortunately is not being strongly challenged, and I think the Democratic Party can regret it. At this point the race seems a sure lose. My best wishes to S Bellows.
POTENTIALLY COMPETITIVE OR FAVOURABLE RACES IN THE 50 LESS FAVOURABLE SEATS (Plus)
WV-Sen 2018: Despite WV is becoming a difficult state, the Republican bench is so short. WV-Sen 2014 (Open by D) and WV-Gov 2016 (Open by D) are making this bench shorter. Still some serious candidate can be ready for this race. I think the Republicans will fight the race like they are fighting every race in R+ territory. But it seems the easier option of the group at this point.
AK-Sen 2014: M Begich, the young Democratic senator from AK, is becoming surprisingly resistant to the Republican challenge. At this point my rating gives Lean D to this race. But still there he will need to fight very much until november.
NC-Sen 2014: There is a tough outside campaign since the begin of the cycle against K Hagan. Until now this campaign of outside money has not been enough contested. I hope it changes, and with a more balanced spending this race can be a pure Toss-Up until the end, just like NC was in the lasts presidential campaigns.
LA-Sen 2014: M Landrieu also is being strong enough to keep the race very competitive. She is also in Toss-Up in my numerical rating. The electoral system of LA with the run-offs and the need to come very close to a 50% in order to win the seat, makes she needs an aditional effort, but at this point it seems that she can do it.
AR-Sen 2014: The race is a Toss-Up at this point in my rating chart. M Pryor is in a difficult situation, but some people is assuming that the race is lost and this is not rigth. It will be necessary to fight very hard to keep the seat, but also it will be necessary to fight very hard to to defeat the incumbent.
MO-Sen 2018: In 2012 C McCaskill proved to be a smart woman and it is not easy to defeat her despite to be not the most popular politician. Her chance for the re-election will depend of how bad can be the environment in 2018. The bench of potential candidates that have the Republicans is enough to make the race competitive.
ND-Sen 2018: H Heitkamp is the firts of the group of Democratic senators that win in 2012 in R+ states by narrow margin. No doubt. This will be a difficult race. The environment in 2018 can be worse than in 2012 but the they will be incumbents. Surely the best case that we can expect is a AK-Sen 2014 situation with M Begich stronger than expected. The bench of Republicans in ND is so big and strong thanks to a good number of statewide elected offices in Republican hands. E Schafer can be the strongest of them.
IN-Sen 2018: Again the same history for J Donnelly but in a little more favourable state. Indiana is the kind of state where an incumbent not unpopular cand defend himself. The most likely situation would be a Toss-Up race. Also the Republican bench is so strong in Indiana with M Daniels as the most difficult potential challenger for J Donnelly.
MT-Sen 2018: J Tester is not in his firts term but after two narrow dictories, this race can go by the same way also in 2018. The situation can be very close to the previous cases (MO, ND or IN). It would be a Toss-Up if the Republicans have a decent candidate. The Republican bench in Montana is the shortest of the states in this situation, but they also have the strongest potential challenger in all these states with M Racicot, who can be favored over J Tester.
GA-Sen 2014: The race for the Open by R seat is becoming competitive thanks to the efforts of M Nunn. I would not tell that she is favored. The race is rated as Lean R in my rating chart, but the Republicans have a so unpredictable situation here. Still GA is a state where they win habitually in the statewide elections of the last years.
KY-Sen 2014: The Republican leader in the Senate, M McConnell is showing weakness to win in his home state. He has a serious primary challenge (in 2010 the Republican stablishment lost the primary vs the Tea Party style candidate) and also has a serious challenger from the Democratic side. Again I would not tell A L Grimes is favored, the race is rated as LeR in my rating chart, but this race can be a big headache for the Republican stablishment all the year.
IN-Sen 2016: This is another seat that can be endangered for the Republicans if a strong Democratic challenger emerges. D Coats seems not too strong, but habitually a Republican is favored in Indiana. Until now, the strongest Democratic challenger in Indiana seems the former senator E Bayh, despite to be unpopular in other places.
FL-Sen 2016: M Rubio is flirting (too much) with a bid for president in the year when he should run for reelection. At this point the chance of an open seat seem low, but M Rubio is weak enough to be considered a good goal for 2016. The Democratic bench in Florida is not too strong. In the last years the strongest Democrat (after W Nelson and C Christ) running for high level office was B Castor. A Sink, considered one of the strongest potential challenger lost recently a race of a lot lower level.
AZ-Sen 2016: The first polling numbers are showing J McCain very weak. G Giffords is performing the best between the potential Democratic candidates, leading over him, in a situation that can be a Toss-Up. In states like Arizona it is not easy ton know if is better to have a dammaged incumbent or to have an open seat.
KY-Sen 2016: Again a popular Democratic politician can create some trouble to a Republican senator, in this case R Paul. As in the case of M Rubio, I think not that this seat will be open. And in the case of being open it would be difficult to win the seat in Kentucky with R Paul in the top of the ticket, even with H Clinton in the Democratic Party. Not an easy prospect but maybe some chance, and surely a competitive race.
NC-Sen 2016: R Burr is not a specially weak incumbent but NC is not as hostile state. Taking into account the prospect of a favourable year in 2016 with H Clinton as candidate, we can not forget this seat. The Democratic bench is good. There is a decent number of Democratic statewide eleccted officers, but in NC there is not a local strong star like in other states (Beebe, Bayh, Bredesen, Beshear,...).
MO-Sen 2016: The Democratic Party would have a strong challenger also for R Blunt. There is not reason to think that R Blunt is weak, but J Nixon is fairly popular and can make the race competitive. The current governor of MO is term limited in 2014 and to challenge R Blunt can be a natural step in his political career, taking into account that C McCaskill holds the other seat in MO.
OH-Sen 2016: The last case of this list of potential options for the Democratic Party in R+ states (PVI), would be the seat that today hold R Portman. Some of his recent positions can make him vulnerable in the Republican primary, but still, with T Strickland ruling out the race, the Democratic bench can be a little weaker than in other commented states. In the other side the nature of the state is more favourable.
For today's poll we take the seven options in the middle of yesterday's poll plus the 8 new options with less clear favourable or clear prospect. I encourage to all the readers to take part and to vote. High number of votes improve the results.
In about three days we will have the results of this poll traslated to the rank and a new edition of this diary to advance in the way to find the path for a Democratic majority after the elections of 2018. If you get interested you will find the new diary easily in the frontpage of DailyKos Elections (in the right side).