Skip to main content

Republicans claim they're not worried about voting against the Paycheck Fairness Act, because voters are totally going to see through the Democrats being all transparent and stuff, putting forward a bill that's good politics as well as good policy in a shameless attempt to pander for votes. But for not being worried, they sure are pushing back aggressively; you can't swing a dead cybercat over at Politico and similar Beltway media sites without coming across a quote from a Republican explaining just how worried they aren't, and how they totally support equal pay of course but just don't want to do anything about it.

If all those elected Republicans rushing to tell you how little it all matters didn't convince you, the site of Fox News spinning frantically on equal pay might do the trick. Here, two of its hosts couldn't talk fast enough as they threw a series of possible "innocent" explanations for the wage gap against the wall to see what would stick. Melissa Francis may have found the winner:

I would also point out that men lost jobs at two and a half times the rate as women in this last recession. I know plenty of families where the man is now out of work and the woman is the one who's working full time. Probably because she makes a little less, so she was able to keep her job.
Gosh, that's real comforting. It's not accurate, as Media Matters points out—actually, men are more likely than women to be in occupations that are sensitive to shifts in the economy—but imagine if it was true. Women across the country would be sitting there, unable to afford enough food, but feeding their very souls with this thought. In case that one didn't persuade you, though, here are a few other Fox-approved explanations for unequal pay:
  • "No two people are the same, no job is the same ... different people make different decisions and look for different things in a workplace." Different people, different decisions, but funny how consistently it shakes out according to gender, eh?
  • "It is a fact that there are more men who are engineers, more men who are in these higher-paying jobs typically, and that's just a statistically true fact." A Statistically True Fact, mind you. And there's absolutely nothing to be said about the fact that male-dominated occupations just happen to pay more than female-dominated occupations. Let's move right along!
  • "Is this being used as a political ploy by Democrats, because it worked for them last time around?" How dare Democrats use reality as a political tool!

Way to convince us this issue doesn't worry you, guys.

Originally posted to Daily Kos Labor on Wed Apr 09, 2014 at 12:32 PM PDT.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Echos of former Harvard president Larry Summers: (5+ / 0-)
    "It is a fact that there are more men who are engineers, more men who are in these higher-paying jobs typically, and that's just a statistically true fact."

    Pope Francis: the Thumb of Christ in the eyes of the Pharisees.

    by commonmass on Wed Apr 09, 2014 at 12:40:49 PM PDT

    •  It's Bullshit... (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      Because the unequal pay stats are for a women and a man DOING THE SAME JOB with the same experience.  Also - Engineering is the one area where income disparity is not as high.

      “Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires.” - John Steinbeck (Disputed)

      by RichM on Wed Apr 09, 2014 at 02:36:34 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Well (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:

        There is an interesting chart on p.17 of the AAUW report, Graduating to a Pay Gap.  It shows that for STEM-related occupations--math, computer, physical and life sciences, and engineering--there is no gender pay gap one year after graduation.  There is also no gender pay gap in nursing and other health care occupations, which are historically female-dominated  Also interesting is that the average salary for nurses (93% of whom are women) was almost identical to the average salary of math, computer, and physical science occupations (76% of whom are men), which dispels the myth that historically female dominated occupations are low-paying.

        The biggest gender pay gaps are in sales, business, and other white collar occupations.  In my experience, these are precisely the fields where one is likely to run into the most bigoted, backwards thinking men in management positions--for example, I have rarely met a sales manager who wasn't kind of a dick.

        Overall--keeping in mind that the study was looking at earnings one year after graduation with a bachelor's degree--the pay gap between men and women that could not be explained by relevant factors including "occupation, economic sector, hours worked per week, multiple jobs,
        months unemployed since graduation, undergraduate GPA, undergraduate major, undergraduate institution sector, institution selectivity, age, region of residence, and marital status" was 7%.

        "Well, I'm sure I'd feel much worse if I weren't under such heavy sedation..."--David St. Hubbins

        by Old Left Good Left on Wed Apr 09, 2014 at 04:41:43 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  Desperation is when you start making up shit? (8+ / 0-)
  •  I think it's the word "equal" that baffles them. (9+ / 0-)

    Wingnut World: where "Noah" is treated as fact and "NOAA" makes stuff up.

    by here4tehbeer on Wed Apr 09, 2014 at 12:59:46 PM PDT

  •  Interesting how that works... (22+ / 0-)

    If a man is the only worker in a household, he deserves to be paid more because he must support a family.  Yet if a woman is the only worker, she's lucky she's paid less, because she still has a job!

    Next up in Magical Thinking 101:  how tainted meat builds character.

    "When I was an alien, cultures weren't opinions" ~ Kurt Cobain, Territorial Pissings

    by Subterranean on Wed Apr 09, 2014 at 02:04:31 PM PDT

    •  Totally agree. The next step is to convince enough (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      that just having any job is a blessing, no matter how poor the pay and how lousy the hours and (if any) benefits.

      On another note, how many f^@|in years has it been since salary studies found that women were earning getting paid 75% relative to men doing the same job?

      And why hasn't any real progress been made?

      The answer to the second question is easy, just like 'Old Left Good Left' said above,

      The biggest gender pay gaps are in sales, business, and other white collar occupations.  In my experience, these are precisely the fields where one is likely to run into the most bigoted, backwards thinking men in management positions--for example, I have rarely met a sales manager who wasn't kind of a dick.
      IMHO, I have seen Union membership curtail these types of abuses.

      Prediction: When Unions start to regain power, we will know we are on the right path. But beware. The 1% will fight us with everything they think they need to defeat us.

      That is all.

      •  Unions (0+ / 0-)

        I'm watching for signs of unions' resurgence daily.  Dare I hope?  Anti-union hogwash is just as illogical as the above GOP BS.  
        Just found out the other day that a friend intentionally sent an anti-union idiot over to talk to me.  Then he stood back and enjoyed the show as I verbally cleaned her clock.  He says he hasn't seen her at that park since.  I have to admit it did me more good than a year's worth of therapy could.  She didn't know it, but she was the stand-in for all the Gopers I'd love to tear into.  I'm a 5ft tall woman----just so you know it was a fair fight.  

    •  YES! (0+ / 0-)

      Well said! You summed their thinking up very succinctly.  THEY'D never put it that way because it exposes their insane thought processes.

  •  Rethugs Invented Unpaid Internships (6+ / 0-)

    Slavery, at least, paid room and board and clothing.

    •  Unpaid Interships are used across the spectrum (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      Democracy Now had them for many years. It now pays its interns $15 a day.

      "let's talk about that"

      by VClib on Wed Apr 09, 2014 at 11:43:12 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Democracy Now does not support a $10.10/hr min (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:


        Supporters don't pay sub minimum wages, they believe in exploitation when it benefits themselves.

        If you can't afford to pay min wage, you don't hire.

        The most important way to protect the environment is not to have more than one child.

        by nextstep on Thu Apr 10, 2014 at 12:44:52 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  Where have I heard this argument before? (5+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    fenway49, hbk, The Old Grouch, BusyinCA, asm121

    Aren't these the same people who argue that black unemployment would go down if we did away with the minimum wage?

    Yeah, I see their point.  More shitty, low-paying jobs is what working people need.

    29, white male, TX-07 (current), TN-09 (born), TN-08 (where parents live now)

    by TDDVandy on Wed Apr 09, 2014 at 02:07:04 PM PDT

  •  I know it's not acceptable to refer to (4+ / 0-)

    things as "retarded."

    So I won't.

    This is the stupidest fucking thing I've ever heard.  And I've been around a long time.

    What part of math don't these nimrods understand?

    My personal pet peeve is being told that I won't "compromise" with the other side.

    When these people are this fucking off the chart I can't even consider it.

    Compromising with a lunatic is lunacy.

    I am Joe's Steven......

    by Joes Steven on Wed Apr 09, 2014 at 02:10:18 PM PDT

  •  Given the Republican penchant for (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    statistically untrue facts I'm happy when they stumble upon something true even when it doesn't mean what they think it means.

  •  For a network that hawks so much gold... (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Fox News really digs deep to find the silver lining, doesn't it?

    You know you're winning a fight against a Republican when they stop mocking your position and start whining about your tone.

    by slappymagoo on Wed Apr 09, 2014 at 02:10:49 PM PDT

  •  Using this "logic" (11+ / 0-)

    It would be even better for women not to be paid anything at all.  That way, if they should lose their job for some reason, their income won't decline.  

  •  All the female member of congress who voted (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    against the bill could set a fine example for their female constituents by volunteering to cut their congressional pay by 23% or there about.  

  •  Welcome to the "New New Economy" (8+ / 0-)

    Shut up and work for as little as possible so the "job creators" won't be tempted to snatch your job away.

    It's fully consistent with their repeated advocacy of whatever policies will lead to lower wages, and less bargaining power, for workers.

    “Republicans...think American standard of living is a fine thing--so long as it doesn't spread to all the people... And they admire of Government of the United States so much that they would like to buy it.” Harry S. Truman

    by fenway49 on Wed Apr 09, 2014 at 02:13:37 PM PDT

  •  I am just dumbfounded (2+ / 0-)

    that these people think that women don't see their shit for what it is - lame ass justifications for blatant discrimination.

    Paying us less isn't doing us a favor.   And we know that.

    My dogs think I'm smart and pretty.

    by martydd on Wed Apr 09, 2014 at 02:16:15 PM PDT

  •  When you factor in that... (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    tb mare, Old Man from Scene 24, RichM

    attractive women usually don't have to pay for their drinks, it all evens out.

  •  I thought that you couldn't make this shit up! (0+ / 0-)

    How do I walk about without punching half of the populace, I don't know.

    "There's been a little complication with my complication"

    by dash888 on Wed Apr 09, 2014 at 02:17:38 PM PDT

  •  How could FOX know a "statiscally true fact?" (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    They don't know fact from fiction....wait, they must because statistics show that their information is about 78% Counter-Factual, so they must have salted in just enough true fact to pierce through their audiences tinfoil hats.

    I think that Republicanism is revealing itself as a personality disorder, not so much an ideology." -- Naomi Klein

    by AllanTBG on Wed Apr 09, 2014 at 02:18:15 PM PDT

  •  Forget it, Jake. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    It's a Fox host.

    And as the song and dance begins, the children play at home with needles, needles and pins.

    by The Lone Apple on Wed Apr 09, 2014 at 02:26:43 PM PDT

  •  What part of (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    The Old Grouch, allie4fairness

    and "equal pay for equal work," don't these imbeciles understand?  Going on and on about nothing is absolutely unnecessary.

    We are progressively fighting for the fairness and equality in that if you have the same job description as your male counterpart you must receive the same pay.

    What is the norm for too many companies is when hiring for the same job the male has a starting salary higher than his female counterpart.  

    As time goes by,  no matter how much more capable she may become, or even that she may surpass her male counterpart in productivity, her paycheck is never made comensurate with her contribution to the company as compared to her male colleagues.

    That is not fair, nor should it be "monologued" away with utter nonsense.

  •  Bullet 2... (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Red Herring...

    All statistics are given FOR THE SAME POSITION.  Women are earning 77% of a man's salary for the same position.  In Engineering, the disparity is actually less.  So - another lie.

    “Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires.” - John Steinbeck (Disputed)

    by RichM on Wed Apr 09, 2014 at 02:31:29 PM PDT

    •  Well, we could take the government (6+ / 0-)

      out of the equation and simply unionize everyone. The union local would then negotiate wages so that two employees with the same seniority receive the same salary, regardless of gender.

      Somehow I don't think FOX would like that idea though...

      There's only one rule that I know of, babies -- goddammit, you've got to be kind. -- Kurt Vonnegut

      by Cali Scribe on Wed Apr 09, 2014 at 02:54:39 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  That is not correct (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      The oft-quoted "women earn $0.77 for each dollar a man earns" is not a comparison of the same positions.  It is an overall comparison, and does not take into account differences in experience, education, occupation, position, or even hours worked per pay period.

      "Well, I'm sure I'd feel much worse if I weren't under such heavy sedation..."--David St. Hubbins

      by Old Left Good Left on Wed Apr 09, 2014 at 04:31:16 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Translation... (0+ / 0-)

    Let's translate pretty much every "innocent" explanation.

    The people who study this sort of thing for a living, for years and years with advanced degrees are actually low grade morons and didn't think to correct for these easy explanations in the weeks and months they spent analyzing the data they collected.  Clearly, the jobs these people have are make work welfare for the stupid and should be eliminated because Murica and Freedom.
  •  Same people who said "slavery was good for blacks" (4+ / 0-)

    …because it provided a roof and food, PLUS it got them out of Africa and got them to America, land of opportunities.

    Heck, conservatives can spin and find the good side our of ANYTHING!!!

    The fact is not lost on me that the end results somehow ALWAYS favor the bosses...

    •  So let me guess the sub-text there. (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      Conservatives want to help more people by letting the 1% and above, to be having, making, getting, creating, more slaves. OK, I got it now. That totally works for the 1% and above. For everyone else, not so much.

      Plus, it would create more incentives for the lazy underclass to take that fourth and fifth minimum wage, no benefit, part-time, shit  job. The real achievers will take on six or more jobs, or even work for free, just for the enrichment of the experience, and they will eventually become billionaires, and they lived happily ever after.

      •  Remember the story of Tom Sawyer... (0+ / 0-)

        ...who was stuck with painting the fence, until he somehow convinced his friends that it was fun, to a point where he made them pay to allow them the "privilege" to paint it themselves!

        People paying to work: the ultimate wealthy man's wet dream!!!

    •  by Fox logic, working for nothing is best (0+ / 0-)

      If a lower salary means you are less likely to be laid off, no salary should help you keep your job even longer.

      There is nothing quite like trying to support yourself and your family by working for people who think they are doing you a favor by making sure you are underpaid. I agree the parallels on this issue with those who defended slavery as being good for slaves are overwhelming.

      For some reason, this thread brings to mind Barbara Bush talking about how those caught in the nightmare of the Superdome in New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina aftermath were better off than they usually were at home.

      •  Yep, GOP defending the indefensible! (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:

        As long as it benefits the wealthy!

        Years ago, a friend went to work in Qatar. He said the wealthy was using religion (Islam) to tell the poor working class (immigrants mostly working as servants)  that it was "God's will for them to be and remain poor".

        The wealthy class will do everything to encourage low wages, as it impacts them, and the GOP is more than happy to be the messenger (the henchman in reality).

  •  That's it, in the proverbial nutshell: (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Way to convince us this issue doesn't worry you, guys.
    The panicked "memes du jour" flailing is pretty good evidence this issue is one that scares 'em to death.

    What scares me is the track record of [a certain unnamed party] for squandering advantages such as this one.

  •  Has anyone told Megyn Kelly? (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    waterstreet2013, BusyinCA

    If the pilot's good, see, I mean if he's reeeally sharp, he can barrel that baby in so low... oh you oughta see it sometime. It's a sight. A big plane like a '52... varrrooom! Its jet exhaust... frying chickens in the barnyard!

    by Major Kong on Wed Apr 09, 2014 at 02:56:29 PM PDT

  •  Another Republican "The Scream" line: (0+ / 0-)
    "We don't want to live in a world where women get equal pay for equal work !"
    The list is growing. Yet they are still alive.

    "Stealing kids' lunch money makes them strong and independent." -- Rand Ryan-Paul von Koch

    by waterstreet2013 on Wed Apr 09, 2014 at 03:02:34 PM PDT

  •  It's Like Saying, Skin Cancer Is Actually Good (3+ / 0-)

    for you because it will kill you before your money runs out.  Or...
    A congenital heart defect is wonderful because you won't have to look at yourself when you are old & your skin
    starts to sag.

    Only in FOX Land is lower pay for women a good thing.  Go figure!

  •  Republicans keep lowering the bar for themselves. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
  •  Um, so, doesn't this mean that lower pay is BAD (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    for men?  Also, am I the only one who thinks that it's just bad for men all around.  If you had two candidates for a job...everything else being equal...and one was a woman, one a man, and you could get away with paying the woman 30% less, well, what would any businessperson with half a brain do?  Duh.  Come on guys, equal pay is good for you too!

  •  Mr TRs Cosin & I started working for the same (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Carojay, allie4fairness

    company at the same time with the same qualifications in the early 1970s. (We weren't married until several years later.)
    I found out a few years ago that he started at $10K while I started at $8K.
    A couple of years later my boss gave me a smaller raise because "men have to pay for dates and single gals like you don't." He wasn't swayed by my telling him that I always paid my share on dates (a feminist point of honor at the time) and had to pay rent and support myself just like a man.
    He gave much the same story a while later to another single female colleague when he gave a bigger raise to male administrative assistant without a college degree; the admin had a family to support but she didn't. In fact she was supporting her mother as well herself, but that didn't matter to him.
    It's beyond frustrating that this sort of inequality still exists, and that people are still clueless enough to use virtually the same arguments in its favor.

    •  Same thing happened to me circa 1970. (0+ / 0-)

      My future husband and I were working the same job, living together and had no kids.  Even though I had seniority, my future husband got a higher raise.  Our boss, the most liberal of liberals, said it was because future hubby had a family to support, even though we pooled our money.  When I called him on that argument as being totally bogus, my boss apologized.  But he didn't even out the raises.

      Freedom of speech, in my view, does not mean the freedom to buy the United States government -- Bernie Sanders

      by OnePingOnly on Wed Apr 09, 2014 at 06:58:53 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Now dear (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    don't you worry your pretty little head about that...

    Being attentive to the needs of others might not be the point of life, but it is the work of life. It can be ... almost impossibly difficult. But it is not something we give. It is what we get in exchange for having to die. - Jonathan Safran Foer

    by ramara on Wed Apr 09, 2014 at 04:10:52 PM PDT

  •  I herebye recommend (0+ / 0-)

    something called the CEO opportunity act. Let's slash the pay of CEOs so to keep them from being laid off. Whuddayall think? The CEOs are out there selflessly creating jobs for us all, so it's about time we come to their rescue. Let's all stand with our CEO's to protect their jobs!!!! From here forth, CEOs can not be paid any more than 40 times what the lowest paid employees of the corporations earn.

    Just another underemployed IT professional computer geek.

    by RhodeIslandAspie on Wed Apr 09, 2014 at 07:21:56 PM PDT

    •  RIAspie - Fortune 500 CEOs last on average (0+ / 0-)

      about five years before they are replaced (laid off).

      "let's talk about that"

      by VClib on Wed Apr 09, 2014 at 11:49:26 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  And in five years make far more than most of us (0+ / 0-)

        will ever make in our lives, and on top of that, get an incredible severance package.

        What other job is there where you can be compensated very well, even as you are fired for messing up your job.

        Just another underemployed IT professional computer geek.

        by RhodeIslandAspie on Thu Apr 10, 2014 at 07:41:41 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  Most senior executive jobs have pre-determined (0+ / 0-)

          severance that is negotiated as part of the initial hiring or promotion package. Typically the severance is payable unless the executive is fired for "cause", which depending on the location of the company can vary widely.

          Compensation, including severance, is all about leverage. If someone really wants you to work for them they will agree to high levels of compensation and generous severance, if things don't work out.

          "let's talk about that"

          by VClib on Thu Apr 10, 2014 at 09:07:05 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  What's our parallel? (0+ / 0-)

            We mechanics, techs, cooks, clerks, and other common peons can get laid off with no notice, and we get no golden parachute.  The same corporistas, who give themselves these gifts, never met a minimum wage hike that they failed to oppose.

            Just another underemployed IT professional computer geek.

            by RhodeIslandAspie on Thu Apr 10, 2014 at 09:38:07 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

            •  RI Aspie - it's all about leverage (1+ / 0-)
              Recommended by:

              Unfortunately most employees are viewed as replaceable and the senior management isn't overly concerned if they leave or stay because new employees with similar skills are readily available.

              Mechanics, techs, cooks and clerks need to be part of unions so they have fair work rules, seniority, and due process.

              "let's talk about that"

              by VClib on Thu Apr 10, 2014 at 10:05:38 PM PDT

              [ Parent ]

  •  It Builds Character Don't You Know. (0+ / 0-)

    Low wages, harsh conditions build character and moral fiber, whatever that is, don't you know?  

    A bad idea isn't responsible for those who believe it. ---Stephen Cannell

    by YellerDog on Wed Apr 09, 2014 at 10:29:14 PM PDT

  •  So let's see... (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    So according to conservative logic:

    Millionaires won't want to work or create jobs anymore if we tax them a couple of percent more.

    But women should be happy to earn less because it means that they are less likely to lose their jobs.

    Pardon my language, but there is no gentle way to say this: these people need to go fuck themselves.

  •  Equal Pay for Women (0+ / 0-)

    The Republicans must be running scared since they are denying with bated breath that there is nothing to worry about. To my way of thinking, they look more and more foolish with each passing day.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site