Skip to main content

Crossposted at Of Means and Ends.

1) Stop publishing articles about feminism.

2) Stop talking to women, just to be safe.

Guardian writer David Foster has faced a fierce and well-deserved backlash to an inane article blaming feminists for stifling sexual liberation by calling out sexism. 

The campaign against everyday sexism has shown that a deeply unpleasant vein of misogyny still runs through our society. But in highlighting the antisocial, misguided behaviour of some unreconstructed individuals, it is important to be aware that such behaviour is not representative of most men's attitudes. More worryingly, from the perspective of a progressive sexual politics there is a danger that the campaign is promulgating a view that any direct sexual advance is tantamount to harassment. If directly propositioning somebody for sex is automatically condemned as misogynist, as the campaign appears to assert, then the movement risks being highly counterproductive to the feminist cause and playing into the hands of the sexually repressive, patriarchal ideology that feminism strives to counter.
Foster is taking a tired argument about uptight feminist killjoys who don't "let men be men" and giving it a faux-feminist anti-capitalist sheen.
Sexual pleasure pursued purely for its own sake runs counter to what Freud called the "reality principle" and social philosopher Herbert Marcuse later adapted as the "performance principle" – ie the restraints placed on us by the demands of civilised society, whereby sexual gratification has to be earned through social "performance". Such performance is manifested through some or all those things – money, social status, property, marriage, procreation – that underpin capitalism and ultimately civilisation. In short, such a principle seeks to ensure that the pursuit of sexual pleasure occurs initially within a framework of spending and consumption, being ultimately directed towards a monogamous, patriarchal, potentially procreative relationship.
Apparently if you don't want to bow down to our capitalist overlords and sign up for a house with a picket fence and 2.5 kids, your only alternative is to randomly proposition people on the street.

Foster tries to align himself with a sex-positive feminism that he clearly doesn't understand. There's a middle ground between traditional dating and creeping on random women. Ideally, even in a no strings attached sexual encounter, there is some personal rapport that is being built, and at least common human decency if not emphasizing the friends in friends with benefits. Most importantly, there is consent. And to get to that consent requires conversation and reading what a person is or is not interested in.

There are ample ways someone can pursue that liberation without making women feel intimidated, frightened or objectified. I've known plenty of women who've pursued such arrangements, in a way that was comfortable and respectful. I know plenty of men who've participated in them without saying or doing things that would land them on the everyday sexism website.

Aside from setting up a bizarre all-or-nothing dichotomy, Foster is ignoring the power dynamics at play that make random, unsolicited sexual advances creepy and frightening to women:

Feminists quite rightly espouse that both women and men should have the right to pursue sexual pleasure purely for its own sake, outside of a monogamous relationship, and independent of the patriarchal strictures of consumer capitalism. As such, there is nothing inherently sexist, or threatening or harassing, about making a direct, unambiguous sexual advance to another person. We are conditioned to find such propositions taboo because an expression of straightforward, unencumbered desire transgresses prevailing ideology.
It might not feel inherently threatening to a man, but to be stuck on a bus or a train with a stranger who made an "unambiguous sexual advance," to be propositioned by someone twice your size, to have no way to predict how a man will respond to rejection can make women feel unsafe.

A woman (or man) does not consent to being sexualized by going out in public. People can arrange the kind of sexual adventures Foster talks about outside of monogamous relationships by engaging with people as human beings first, developing mutual respect, and obtaining mutual consent. Rather than blaming feminists' assertion of rights for sexual repression, Foster needs to learn to recognize what the sexual liberation he claims to want actually looks like.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  We Interrupt This Century for a Word From 1963. (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Cadillac64, fToRrEeEsSt, HedwigKos

    As a Summer of Love and Kent State boomer I've been hounded by these Pat Buchanan Korea War era pre-boomers for half a century, with their Ozzie & Harriet ethnic insularity, sexual hangups and morbid fear of the Rooskies.

    I'd rather be marooned for life with a hundred of today's high school kids who could never know any of my generation's history than even one Generation Tea who's barely 4 years older than me.

    Because they the elders of American society, know less of the world I've lived my entire life in, than any school kid.

    30 years ago we used to say if these goons could all just get laid once they'd loosen up and learn how to let everybody live. Today I think they're old enough that it would give most of them a heart attack.

    Either way.

    Jesus Lord please let me the FUCK out of Sunday School.

    We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for victims of our nation and for those it calls enemy.... --ML King "Beyond Vietnam"

    by Gooserock on Thu Apr 10, 2014 at 09:14:48 AM PDT

  •  Join the republican party? Do i win? :p nt (0+ / 0-)

    When the Republicans are in power they get what they want and when the Democrats are in power they still get what they want. At what point do people finally see it is just theater? ~ Me

    by fToRrEeEsSt on Thu Apr 10, 2014 at 09:31:47 AM PDT

  •  only women needed to be liberated (0+ / 0-)

    Conservatives should take their own advice: "It's liberation when a woman (or a gay man) does it.  It's harassment when a straight man does it."

    Domestic politics is the continuation of civil war by other means.

    by Visceral on Thu Apr 10, 2014 at 11:15:59 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site