Skip to main content

David Brooks reminds me of one of those film aliens who disguise themselves in human skin.   For half the movie, they're just friendly people.  Then, when things get serious, they peel off the skin, reveal their reptilian, disgusting alien form, and go about their real business of destroying the world.

Brooks has made an excellent living as the "reasonable conservative."  Why he's even won awards for "civility."  He engages in oh so decorous banter with Mark Shields on the News Hour. He writes a lot of columns about noble sounding philosophical issues.  He even sometimes dares to criticize some of the loons in the Republican party (when it's relatively safe, like in the case of Sarah Palin).

But he also can't help sometimes peeling off his human, civilized skin to reveal the alien right wing zealot that he certainly was outwardly in the '90s and Bush II years, but has done his best to conceal so he can continue his Times and $50,000 speaking gigs.

Yesterday, for example, on Meet the Press, Brooks weighed in on the President's foreign policy:

   “Basically since Yalta we’ve had an assumption that borders are basically going to be borders and once that comes into question if in Ukraine or in Crimea or anywhere else, then all over the world all bets are off.

    “And let’s face it, Obama, whether deservedly or not, does have a – I’ll say it crudely – but a manhood problem in the Middle East. Is he tough enough to stand up to somebody like Assad or somebody like Putin? I think a lot of the rap is unfair but certainly in the Middle East there is an assumption that he’s not tough enough.”*

No, David, saying your own statement is "crude," doesn't excuse its crudeness and insult. Especially when it's simply and utterly wrong. For example, Steve  Benen reminds us that as for "standing up to Assad," that already happened last year, "when Obama threatened military force and Assad agreed to give up his chemical-weapons stockpiles".  As for other examples of toughness, Benen cites:  
It was this president who escalated the use of force against al Qaeda; it was this president that launched the mission that killed bin Laden; it was this president who increased the use of predator drones to strike at terrorist suspects (including killing Americans affiliated with al Qaeda living abroad); it was this president who helped assemble an international coalition to strike at the Gadhafi regime in Libya; and on and on.
Brooks' phony tough guy pose was echoed by the reliably hackish Chuck Todd, who sagely opined, "You know, it’s not just Bob Corker saying it, okay, questioning whether the president is being alpha male. That’s essentially what he’s saying: He’s not alpha dog enough. His rhetoric isn’t tough enough.”

Yes -- it's not just Corker -- it's you and Brooks!

I don't think you have to be a shrink to conclude that these tough guy, armchair "alpha dogs" just may be compensating for some inadequacy of their own anatomy or consciousness.

I just hope that when Stephen Colbert moves to CBS he will find a way to take with him The Alpha Dog of the Week.  Lord knows there will continue to be many deserving candidates, including resident alien David Brooks.

*Updated (based on comments) to provide full Brooks quote.  Some comments argued that lack of context mitigated Brooks' comments somewhat.  I don't agree.  In fact, I commented that the context actually makes it worse:

First, what evidence does he have that any Middle Easterner perceives Obama as having a "manhood" problem.  Second, it's disingenuous to attribute your own likely feelings to others when you don't have any support from the others.  Third, it doesn't help to say "lot of the rap is unfair" when you've just made a very insulting, unsupported criticism -- it's a weak attempt to run away from the slander you just committed.

In fact, it's classic Brooks passive aggression -- just like the Fox News "some say" technique.  Brooks' attempt to impute to unidentified "Middle Easterners" what are clearly his own (or the "CW") sentiments makes it actually worse.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Meteor Blades, fcvaguy, hannah, Timaeus, Subterranean, karlpk, Shockwave, Wintermute, norabb, Troutfishing, dsb, Heart of the Rockies, 714day, TracieLynn, ask, shanikka, otto, dksbook, revsue, psnyder, Nag, defluxion10, zerelda, Sembtex, randallt, tomjones, rmx2630, sawgrass727, Gowrie Gal, dewtx, stagemom, eru, bleeding blue, Little Lulu, markdd, Tunk, FindingMyVoice, laurel g 15942, peacestpete, begone, tarheelblue, cybersaur, edwardssl, dharmafarmer, mr crabby, cookseytalbott, Lefty Coaster, blueoasis, global citizen, NCJan, JVolvo, CA Nana, blueoregon, Ian Reifowitz, NancyWH, Bernie68, anna shane, Cronesense, merrylib, Mary Mike, wildweasels, Dave in Northridge, mbh1023, jayden, Timmethy, TDDVandy, TomP, cville townie, Sixty Something, Aureas2, Involuntary Exile, rssrai, royce, petulans, TexanJane, dmhlt 66, Diogenes2008, Bule Betawi, bobatkinson, mkor7, TheOpinionGuy, Denise Oliver Velez, jfromga, LookingUp, Lefty Ladig, ruscle, FogCityJohn, serendipityisabitch, catwho, piers, BenderRodriguez, JoanMar, batchick, Texnance, DrTerwilliker, BlueFranco, kenwards, ericlewis0, science nerd, nosleep4u, verdeo, Bluefin, I love OCD, slowbutsure, implicate order, poorbuster, OhioNatureMom, trumpeter, Haf2Read, tardis10, voicemail, Liberal Mole, Joe Jackson, ratcityreprobate, SteelerGrrl, stlsophos, leftykook, jham710, Auriandra, AnnetteK, livingthedream, anodnhajo, TheLizardKing, Chrislove, IndieGuy, ahumbleopinion, The Lone Apple, a2nite, peachcreek, jan4insight, belinda ridgewood, closerange, doroma, OllieGarkey, etherealfire, Portlaw, tn mountain girl, Abelia, Lily O Lady, Blue Bell Bookworm, Dancun74, Thornrose, aresea, Aunt Pat, bob152, ET3117, Jim Domenico, OregonWetDog, palmer18, kkkkate, thanatokephaloides, Shawn87, BMScott

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site