The president emeritus publicly said that a vote for the union could mean the end of Division I sports at Northwestern. A former quarterback visited the team to encourage players to vote no. Coach Pat Fitzgerald, a former football star who is revered on campus, has framed a vote for the union as a personal betrayal. [...]All this pressure adds another piece of uncertainty to the mix: If the players' right to unionize is upheld but they vote no, would that result stand in an NLRB appeal?
Players have heard warnings that the formation of a union would make it harder for them to land jobs after graduation; that Fitzgerald might leave; that alumni donations would dry up; that Northwestern’s planned $225 million athletic center could be scrapped.
While U.S. labor law grants companies broad discretion to campaign against unionization, compel employees to attend anti-union meetings, and make dire predictions, ex-NLRB chair Liebman told Salon the published reports suggested “there would be probably adequate grounds” for the union to file charges against Northwestern, in the event of a defeat, arguing the university had violated the bans on making threats against voting “yes,” or promising benefits for voting “no.” Northwestern’s Cubbage told Salon the university had “followed [NLRB] procedures and all of the rules.”Not only that, but, as part of the NLRB's review of whether the football players are employees who can join unions, the College Athletes Players Association is asking the board to reconsider the Bush-era decision that prevents graduate student teaching assistants at private universities from unionizing.
And amidst all this uncertainty, 76 football players who've faced intimidation and cajoling from their coach and their university are voting.