Skip to main content

In the last couple of weeks, we received more information on Wisconsin's electoral geography, and I think it gives a good idea of the state of play for the State Legislature in the 2014 elections. I'll first direct you to the  Daily Kos breakdown of Wisconsin's legislative districts. If you look at that post, you'll see dark blue districts that both voted for Obama and have Dem legislators, while the dark red voted for Romney and have Republican legislators. The light pink voted for Obama and have Republican legislators, and the light blue voted for Romney and have Democratic legislators. If you want to do your own analysis, here is the poster's Senate information, and the Assembly breakdown.  

I did a similar analysis back in July, using Kos's 2012 votes by legislative district, then combining the Obama vs. Romney votes with the Baldwin vs. Thompson race to break down the individual districts by "dissimilarity to Wisconsin." Basically what I was trying to figure is if Wisconsin's overall numbers were a 50-50 tossup between Dems and Republicans, which party would win in each district? In both examples, the GOP's gerrymandering strategy becomes apparent- packing Dems into heavily pro-Dem seats while stretching as many GOPs as possible into seats that are approximately 55-45 to 60-40 GOP.  

Now with this in mind, last week's Public Policy Polling survey of Wisconsin showed a generic legislative ballot with Dems up by 4 points among Wisconsin voters (Dem 45, GOP 41).  What would that mean if Dems had a uniform 4-point advantage in all legislative elections in November 2014, at 52-48? A quick check shows the following:

Dems pick up 5 seats currently held by GOP
GOP picks up 2 seats currently held by Dems
1 Dem seat is 50-50 toss-up (Doyle)
FINAL RESULT: GOP 57, Dems 41, 1 toss-up

Dems pick up 1 seat (Schultz -open)
GOP picks up 1 seat (Lehman- open)

Seems like GOP gerrymandering will carry the day again at first glance. But look at what happens if there's even a tiny shift further toward the Dems.

5 closest GOP wins in 52-48 Dem year, 2014
Ripp (R-inc.) (50.6%-49.4%)
Bies (R-open) (50.9%-49.1%)
Krug (R-inc.) (51.0%-49.0%)
Klenke (R-open) (51.7%-48.3%)
Vruwink (D-inc.) (52.0%-48.0%)

Ellis (R-open) (52.1%-47.9%)
Moulton (R-inc.) (52.5%-47.5%)
Petrowski (R-inc.) (53.3%-46.7%)
Lassee (R-inc.) (53.5%-46.5%)
Leibham (R-open) (54.2%-45.8%)    

So if Dems added another 2% statewide in this scenario, there's another 5 seats that fall their way in the Assembly along with the 1 toss-up, making it 52-47 GOP in that chamber. Maybe that would inspire some GOP Assembly members to grow a backbone and stand up to Robbin' Vos (something they didn't do in this last session), since only 3 of them defecting could kill legislation, and many more would be endangered in what could be a big Dem year in 2016 (PPP has Hillary Clinton with a commanding lead over all Dems for 2016, including home-staters Scott Walker and Paul Ryan).

In the Senate, it's even closer. A 2% shift to the Dems turn the open Ellis and Moulton seats into toss-ups, and Dems would control the Senate if they won both of those. Add in the fact that the Leibham seat is now open and Lassee is a lunkhead who wanted teachers to have guns in school, and once adorned his website with a quote from Adolph Hitler, and the path to a Dem majority isn't as far off as you'd think.

What's also interesting is the geographic mix of these vulnerable GOP seats. Many are in and around the Appleton/Green Bay area or in western Wisconsin- two swingy areas that Dems need to do well in if they want to win in statewide elections this November.  

Hmm, seems like the electoral map has stated where the prime pick-up territories are for the Dems this November. Imagine how well they could do if the Burke campaign and the WisDems were actually running hard against Scott Walker's and WisGOP's record of corruption and failed economic policies? So GET TO WORK, instead of wasting time talking to us in Madison, where we don't need any convincing to turn out and take out Scott Walker and the rest of this GOP wrecking crew.      

Originally posted to Jake formerly of the LP on Sun Apr 27, 2014 at 01:25 PM PDT.

Also republished by Badger State Progressive.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Click here for the mobile view of the site